Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are still Weak: A Reply to Seidel

Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are still Weak: A Reply to Seidel

Show other versions (1)

In this paper, I reply to Seidel’s (2014) objections against my argument from expert performance to the effect that arguments from expert opinion are weak arguments. I clarify what Seidel takes to be unclear points in my argument and show that it withstands Seidel’s objections.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Moti Mizrahi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2016-07-01
Series:Informal Logic
Online Access:https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4670
id doaj-9b39744214d14fa69ab1b5f21c71b2a6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9b39744214d14fa69ab1b5f21c71b2a62021-06-14T17:00:23ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25772293-734X2016-07-01362Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are still Weak: A Reply to SeidelMoti Mizrahi0School of Arts and Communication Frederick C. Crawford Bldg Room 303 Florida Institute of TechnologyIn this paper, I reply to Seidel’s (2014) objections against my argument from expert performance to the effect that arguments from expert opinion are weak arguments. I clarify what Seidel takes to be unclear points in my argument and show that it withstands Seidel’s objections.https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4670
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Moti Mizrahi
spellingShingle Moti Mizrahi
Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are still Weak: A Reply to Seidel
Informal Logic
author_facet Moti Mizrahi
author_sort Moti Mizrahi
title Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are still Weak: A Reply to Seidel
title_short Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are still Weak: A Reply to Seidel
title_full Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are still Weak: A Reply to Seidel
title_fullStr Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are still Weak: A Reply to Seidel
title_full_unstemmed Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are still Weak: A Reply to Seidel
title_sort why arguments from expert opinion are still weak: a reply to seidel
publisher University of Windsor
series Informal Logic
issn 0824-2577
2293-734X
publishDate 2016-07-01
description In this paper, I reply to Seidel’s (2014) objections against my argument from expert performance to the effect that arguments from expert opinion are weak arguments. I clarify what Seidel takes to be unclear points in my argument and show that it withstands Seidel’s objections.
url https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4670
work_keys_str_mv AT motimizrahi whyargumentsfromexpertopinionarestillweakareplytoseidel
_version_ 1721378154795237376

Similar Items