Chemometrics of Wheat Composites with Hemp, Teff, and Chia Flour: Comparison of Rheological Features

The mixolab, a rheological device developed recently, combines approved farinograph and amylograph test procedures. Analysing wheat flour composites with hemp, teff, or chia in terms of all three mentioned rheological methods, correspondence of farinograph, and amylograph versus mixolab features was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marie Hrušková, Ivan Švec, Ivana Jurinová
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:International Journal of Food Science
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/968020
id doaj-9b38c9652cab4e828b5d5bd516764857
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9b38c9652cab4e828b5d5bd5167648572020-11-24T23:04:32ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Food Science2314-57652013-01-01201310.1155/2013/968020968020Chemometrics of Wheat Composites with Hemp, Teff, and Chia Flour: Comparison of Rheological FeaturesMarie Hrušková0Ivan Švec1Ivana Jurinová2Department of Carbohydrates and Cereals, Institute of Chemical Technology in Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech RepublicDepartment of Carbohydrates and Cereals, Institute of Chemical Technology in Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech RepublicDepartment of Carbohydrates and Cereals, Institute of Chemical Technology in Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech RepublicThe mixolab, a rheological device developed recently, combines approved farinograph and amylograph test procedures. Analysing wheat flour composites with hemp, teff, or chia in terms of all three mentioned rheological methods, correspondence of farinograph, and amylograph versus mixolab features was examined by principal component analysis. The first two principal components, PC1 and PC2, explained 75% of data scatter and allowed a satisfying confirmation of presumed relationships between farinograph or amylograph and mixolab parameters. Dough development time and stability were associated with gluten strength (C1 torque point) and also dough softening (mixing tolerance index) had a link to protein weakening (C1-C2 difference). In the second mentioned case, amylograph viscosity maximum and amylase activity (C3-C4) closeness was verified. Starch and starch gel properties during mixing (C3, C3-C2, and C4) affect dough viscosity (C1) and rheological behaviour (dough development time and stability). Another important finding is unequivocal distinguishing of the composite subsets (of hemp, teff, and chia ones) by the used rheological methods and statistical treatment of multivariable data.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/968020
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marie Hrušková
Ivan Švec
Ivana Jurinová
spellingShingle Marie Hrušková
Ivan Švec
Ivana Jurinová
Chemometrics of Wheat Composites with Hemp, Teff, and Chia Flour: Comparison of Rheological Features
International Journal of Food Science
author_facet Marie Hrušková
Ivan Švec
Ivana Jurinová
author_sort Marie Hrušková
title Chemometrics of Wheat Composites with Hemp, Teff, and Chia Flour: Comparison of Rheological Features
title_short Chemometrics of Wheat Composites with Hemp, Teff, and Chia Flour: Comparison of Rheological Features
title_full Chemometrics of Wheat Composites with Hemp, Teff, and Chia Flour: Comparison of Rheological Features
title_fullStr Chemometrics of Wheat Composites with Hemp, Teff, and Chia Flour: Comparison of Rheological Features
title_full_unstemmed Chemometrics of Wheat Composites with Hemp, Teff, and Chia Flour: Comparison of Rheological Features
title_sort chemometrics of wheat composites with hemp, teff, and chia flour: comparison of rheological features
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Food Science
issn 2314-5765
publishDate 2013-01-01
description The mixolab, a rheological device developed recently, combines approved farinograph and amylograph test procedures. Analysing wheat flour composites with hemp, teff, or chia in terms of all three mentioned rheological methods, correspondence of farinograph, and amylograph versus mixolab features was examined by principal component analysis. The first two principal components, PC1 and PC2, explained 75% of data scatter and allowed a satisfying confirmation of presumed relationships between farinograph or amylograph and mixolab parameters. Dough development time and stability were associated with gluten strength (C1 torque point) and also dough softening (mixing tolerance index) had a link to protein weakening (C1-C2 difference). In the second mentioned case, amylograph viscosity maximum and amylase activity (C3-C4) closeness was verified. Starch and starch gel properties during mixing (C3, C3-C2, and C4) affect dough viscosity (C1) and rheological behaviour (dough development time and stability). Another important finding is unequivocal distinguishing of the composite subsets (of hemp, teff, and chia ones) by the used rheological methods and statistical treatment of multivariable data.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/968020
work_keys_str_mv AT mariehruskova chemometricsofwheatcompositeswithhempteffandchiaflourcomparisonofrheologicalfeatures
AT ivansvec chemometricsofwheatcompositeswithhempteffandchiaflourcomparisonofrheologicalfeatures
AT ivanajurinova chemometricsofwheatcompositeswithhempteffandchiaflourcomparisonofrheologicalfeatures
_version_ 1725629788026044416