Characterizing the limits of human stability during motion: perturbative experiment validates a model-based approach for the Sit-to-Stand task

Falls affect a growing number of the population each year. Clinical methods to assess fall risk usually evaluate the performance of specific motions such as balancing or Sit-to-Stand. Unfortunately, these techniques have been shown to have poor predictive power, and are unable to identify the portio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patrick D. Holmes, Shannon M. Danforth, Xiao-Yu Fu, Talia Y. Moore, Ram Vasudevan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2020-01-01
Series:Royal Society Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.191410
id doaj-9b314c9d947d4db8874325ea79fd4726
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9b314c9d947d4db8874325ea79fd47262020-11-25T03:56:47ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032020-01-017110.1098/rsos.191410191410Characterizing the limits of human stability during motion: perturbative experiment validates a model-based approach for the Sit-to-Stand taskPatrick D. HolmesShannon M. DanforthXiao-Yu FuTalia Y. MooreRam VasudevanFalls affect a growing number of the population each year. Clinical methods to assess fall risk usually evaluate the performance of specific motions such as balancing or Sit-to-Stand. Unfortunately, these techniques have been shown to have poor predictive power, and are unable to identify the portions of motion that are most unstable. To this end, it may be useful to identify the set of body configurations that can accomplish a task under a specified control strategy. The resulting strategy-specific boundary between stable and unstable motion could be used to identify individuals at risk of falling. The recently proposed Stability Basin is defined as the set of configurations through time that do not lead to failure for an individual under their chosen control strategy. This paper presents a novel method to compute the Stability Basin and the first experimental validation of the Stability Basin with a perturbative Sit-to-Stand experiment involving forwards or backwards pulls from a motor-driven cable with 11 subjects. The individually-constructed Stability Basins are used to identify when a trial fails, i.e. when an individual must switch from their chosen control strategy (indicated by a step or sit) to recover from a perturbation. The constructed Stability Basins correctly predict the outcome of trials where failure was observed with over 90% accuracy, and correctly predict the outcome of successful trials with over 95% accuracy. The Stability Basin was compared to three other methods and was found to estimate the stable region with over 45% more accuracy in all cases. This study demonstrates that Stability Basins offer a novel model-based approach for quantifying stability during motion, which could be used in physical therapy for individuals at risk of falling.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.191410biomechanicsmathematical modellocomotionfall riskreachabilityfeedback control
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Patrick D. Holmes
Shannon M. Danforth
Xiao-Yu Fu
Talia Y. Moore
Ram Vasudevan
spellingShingle Patrick D. Holmes
Shannon M. Danforth
Xiao-Yu Fu
Talia Y. Moore
Ram Vasudevan
Characterizing the limits of human stability during motion: perturbative experiment validates a model-based approach for the Sit-to-Stand task
Royal Society Open Science
biomechanics
mathematical model
locomotion
fall risk
reachability
feedback control
author_facet Patrick D. Holmes
Shannon M. Danforth
Xiao-Yu Fu
Talia Y. Moore
Ram Vasudevan
author_sort Patrick D. Holmes
title Characterizing the limits of human stability during motion: perturbative experiment validates a model-based approach for the Sit-to-Stand task
title_short Characterizing the limits of human stability during motion: perturbative experiment validates a model-based approach for the Sit-to-Stand task
title_full Characterizing the limits of human stability during motion: perturbative experiment validates a model-based approach for the Sit-to-Stand task
title_fullStr Characterizing the limits of human stability during motion: perturbative experiment validates a model-based approach for the Sit-to-Stand task
title_full_unstemmed Characterizing the limits of human stability during motion: perturbative experiment validates a model-based approach for the Sit-to-Stand task
title_sort characterizing the limits of human stability during motion: perturbative experiment validates a model-based approach for the sit-to-stand task
publisher The Royal Society
series Royal Society Open Science
issn 2054-5703
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Falls affect a growing number of the population each year. Clinical methods to assess fall risk usually evaluate the performance of specific motions such as balancing or Sit-to-Stand. Unfortunately, these techniques have been shown to have poor predictive power, and are unable to identify the portions of motion that are most unstable. To this end, it may be useful to identify the set of body configurations that can accomplish a task under a specified control strategy. The resulting strategy-specific boundary between stable and unstable motion could be used to identify individuals at risk of falling. The recently proposed Stability Basin is defined as the set of configurations through time that do not lead to failure for an individual under their chosen control strategy. This paper presents a novel method to compute the Stability Basin and the first experimental validation of the Stability Basin with a perturbative Sit-to-Stand experiment involving forwards or backwards pulls from a motor-driven cable with 11 subjects. The individually-constructed Stability Basins are used to identify when a trial fails, i.e. when an individual must switch from their chosen control strategy (indicated by a step or sit) to recover from a perturbation. The constructed Stability Basins correctly predict the outcome of trials where failure was observed with over 90% accuracy, and correctly predict the outcome of successful trials with over 95% accuracy. The Stability Basin was compared to three other methods and was found to estimate the stable region with over 45% more accuracy in all cases. This study demonstrates that Stability Basins offer a novel model-based approach for quantifying stability during motion, which could be used in physical therapy for individuals at risk of falling.
topic biomechanics
mathematical model
locomotion
fall risk
reachability
feedback control
url https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.191410
work_keys_str_mv AT patrickdholmes characterizingthelimitsofhumanstabilityduringmotionperturbativeexperimentvalidatesamodelbasedapproachforthesittostandtask
AT shannonmdanforth characterizingthelimitsofhumanstabilityduringmotionperturbativeexperimentvalidatesamodelbasedapproachforthesittostandtask
AT xiaoyufu characterizingthelimitsofhumanstabilityduringmotionperturbativeexperimentvalidatesamodelbasedapproachforthesittostandtask
AT taliaymoore characterizingthelimitsofhumanstabilityduringmotionperturbativeexperimentvalidatesamodelbasedapproachforthesittostandtask
AT ramvasudevan characterizingthelimitsofhumanstabilityduringmotionperturbativeexperimentvalidatesamodelbasedapproachforthesittostandtask
_version_ 1724463788568084480