Treatment of advanced gallbladder cancer: A SEER‐based study

Abstract Purpose The treatment of advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC) remains controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore treatment choices for advanced GBC. Methods We identified four different treatments from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database: sur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weipu Mao, Fang Deng, Dongyan Wang, Li Gao, Xiuquan Shi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2679
id doaj-9b30108d70134f4c98b5a0dce7e29cec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9b30108d70134f4c98b5a0dce7e29cec2020-11-25T00:14:08ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342020-01-019114115010.1002/cam4.2679Treatment of advanced gallbladder cancer: A SEER‐based studyWeipu Mao0Fang Deng1Dongyan Wang2Li Gao3Xiuquan Shi4Department of General Surgery The People's Hospital of Yingshang Fuyang ChinaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory The People's Hospital of Yingshang Fuyang ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology Pudong New Area Gongli Hospital Affiliated to Naval Military Medical University Shanghai ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology The People's Hospital of Yingshang Fuyang ChinaDepartment of General Surgery The People's Hospital of Yingshang Fuyang ChinaAbstract Purpose The treatment of advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC) remains controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore treatment choices for advanced GBC. Methods We identified four different treatments from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database: surgery, chemotherapy (CT), surgery and chemotherapy (Surgery + CT), and no surgery/no chemotherapy (No surgery/No CT). Kaplan‐Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression method were used to determine the risk factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer‐specific survival (CSS). In addition, patients in AJCC stages III and IV stage were matched with 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) for diagnosis age, race, marital status, histological type, tumor grade, and treatment pattern to decrease the possibility of selection bias. Results A total of 288 AJCC stage III patients and 4239 AJCC stage IV patients with advanced GBC were identified from the SEER database between 2004 and 2015. Treatment pattern was an independent risk factor for patients with advanced GBC. For all patient, AJCC stage III patients and AJCC stage IV patients, “Surgery + CT” treatment minimized the OS and CSS in advanced GBC patients. In addition, after the PSM analysis, the “Surgery + CT” treatment still significantly decreased patient OS and CSS. Conclusions “Surgery + CT” treatment can provide survival benefits for patients with advanced GBC. In addition, “Surgery + CT” treatment was not fully utilized and may further improve the survival rate of GBC patients.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2679advanced gallbladder cancerchemotherapySEERsurgerysurvival
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Weipu Mao
Fang Deng
Dongyan Wang
Li Gao
Xiuquan Shi
spellingShingle Weipu Mao
Fang Deng
Dongyan Wang
Li Gao
Xiuquan Shi
Treatment of advanced gallbladder cancer: A SEER‐based study
Cancer Medicine
advanced gallbladder cancer
chemotherapy
SEER
surgery
survival
author_facet Weipu Mao
Fang Deng
Dongyan Wang
Li Gao
Xiuquan Shi
author_sort Weipu Mao
title Treatment of advanced gallbladder cancer: A SEER‐based study
title_short Treatment of advanced gallbladder cancer: A SEER‐based study
title_full Treatment of advanced gallbladder cancer: A SEER‐based study
title_fullStr Treatment of advanced gallbladder cancer: A SEER‐based study
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of advanced gallbladder cancer: A SEER‐based study
title_sort treatment of advanced gallbladder cancer: a seer‐based study
publisher Wiley
series Cancer Medicine
issn 2045-7634
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Abstract Purpose The treatment of advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC) remains controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore treatment choices for advanced GBC. Methods We identified four different treatments from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database: surgery, chemotherapy (CT), surgery and chemotherapy (Surgery + CT), and no surgery/no chemotherapy (No surgery/No CT). Kaplan‐Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression method were used to determine the risk factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer‐specific survival (CSS). In addition, patients in AJCC stages III and IV stage were matched with 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) for diagnosis age, race, marital status, histological type, tumor grade, and treatment pattern to decrease the possibility of selection bias. Results A total of 288 AJCC stage III patients and 4239 AJCC stage IV patients with advanced GBC were identified from the SEER database between 2004 and 2015. Treatment pattern was an independent risk factor for patients with advanced GBC. For all patient, AJCC stage III patients and AJCC stage IV patients, “Surgery + CT” treatment minimized the OS and CSS in advanced GBC patients. In addition, after the PSM analysis, the “Surgery + CT” treatment still significantly decreased patient OS and CSS. Conclusions “Surgery + CT” treatment can provide survival benefits for patients with advanced GBC. In addition, “Surgery + CT” treatment was not fully utilized and may further improve the survival rate of GBC patients.
topic advanced gallbladder cancer
chemotherapy
SEER
surgery
survival
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2679
work_keys_str_mv AT weipumao treatmentofadvancedgallbladdercanceraseerbasedstudy
AT fangdeng treatmentofadvancedgallbladdercanceraseerbasedstudy
AT dongyanwang treatmentofadvancedgallbladdercanceraseerbasedstudy
AT ligao treatmentofadvancedgallbladdercanceraseerbasedstudy
AT xiuquanshi treatmentofadvancedgallbladdercanceraseerbasedstudy
_version_ 1725391443979141120