Spatial extent of neighboring plants influences the strength of associational effects on mammal herbivory

Abstract There is high variability in the level of herbivory between individual plants from the same species with potential effects on population dynamics, community composition, and ecosystem structure and function. This variability can be partly explained by associational effects (i.e., the impact...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emilie Champagne, Jean‐Pierre Tremblay, Steeve D. Côté
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-06-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1371
id doaj-9b168c9c41114d7b9b69a6ee4226e808
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9b168c9c41114d7b9b69a6ee4226e8082020-11-24T21:51:02ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252016-06-0176n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.1371Spatial extent of neighboring plants influences the strength of associational effects on mammal herbivoryEmilie Champagne0Jean‐Pierre Tremblay1Steeve D. Côté2Département de Biologie & Centre d’études Nordiques Université Laval Québec Québec G1V 0A6 CanadaDépartement de Biologie & Centre d’études Nordiques Université Laval Québec Québec G1V 0A6 CanadaDépartement de Biologie & Centre d’études Nordiques Université Laval Québec Québec G1V 0A6 CanadaAbstract There is high variability in the level of herbivory between individual plants from the same species with potential effects on population dynamics, community composition, and ecosystem structure and function. This variability can be partly explained by associational effects (i.e., the impact of the presence of neighboring plants on the level of herbivory experienced by a focal plant) but it is still unclear how the spatial scale of plant neighborhood modulates foraging choice of herbivores, an inherently spatial process in itself. Using a meta‐analysis, we investigated how spatial scale modifies associational effects on the susceptibility to browsing by herbivores with movement capacities similar to deer. From 2496 articles found in literature databases, we selected 46 studies providing a total of 168 differences of means in damage by herbivores or survival to woody plants (mostly) with and without neighboring plants. Spatial scales were reported as distance between plants or as plot size. We estimated the relationships between the effect sizes and spatial scale, type of associational effects, and nature of the experiment using meta‐analysis mixed models. The strength of associational effects declined with increasing plot size, regardless of the type of associational effects. Associational defenses (i.e., decrease in herbivory for focal plants associated with unpalatable neighbors) had stronger magnitude than associational susceptibilities. The high remaining heterogeneity among studies suggests that untested factors modulate associational effects, such as nutritional quality of focal and neighboring plants, density of herbivores, timing of browsing, etc. Associational effects are already considered in multiple restoration contexts worldwide, but a better understanding of these relationships could improve their use in conservation, restoration, and forest exploitation when browsing is a concern. This study is the first to investigate spatial patterns of associational effects across species and ecosystems, an issue that is essential to determine differential herbivory damages among plants.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1371associational resistanceattractant–decoy hypothesismeta‐analysisneighboring effectsplant–herbivore relationships; spatial scale
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emilie Champagne
Jean‐Pierre Tremblay
Steeve D. Côté
spellingShingle Emilie Champagne
Jean‐Pierre Tremblay
Steeve D. Côté
Spatial extent of neighboring plants influences the strength of associational effects on mammal herbivory
Ecosphere
associational resistance
attractant–decoy hypothesis
meta‐analysis
neighboring effects
plant–herbivore relationships; spatial scale
author_facet Emilie Champagne
Jean‐Pierre Tremblay
Steeve D. Côté
author_sort Emilie Champagne
title Spatial extent of neighboring plants influences the strength of associational effects on mammal herbivory
title_short Spatial extent of neighboring plants influences the strength of associational effects on mammal herbivory
title_full Spatial extent of neighboring plants influences the strength of associational effects on mammal herbivory
title_fullStr Spatial extent of neighboring plants influences the strength of associational effects on mammal herbivory
title_full_unstemmed Spatial extent of neighboring plants influences the strength of associational effects on mammal herbivory
title_sort spatial extent of neighboring plants influences the strength of associational effects on mammal herbivory
publisher Wiley
series Ecosphere
issn 2150-8925
publishDate 2016-06-01
description Abstract There is high variability in the level of herbivory between individual plants from the same species with potential effects on population dynamics, community composition, and ecosystem structure and function. This variability can be partly explained by associational effects (i.e., the impact of the presence of neighboring plants on the level of herbivory experienced by a focal plant) but it is still unclear how the spatial scale of plant neighborhood modulates foraging choice of herbivores, an inherently spatial process in itself. Using a meta‐analysis, we investigated how spatial scale modifies associational effects on the susceptibility to browsing by herbivores with movement capacities similar to deer. From 2496 articles found in literature databases, we selected 46 studies providing a total of 168 differences of means in damage by herbivores or survival to woody plants (mostly) with and without neighboring plants. Spatial scales were reported as distance between plants or as plot size. We estimated the relationships between the effect sizes and spatial scale, type of associational effects, and nature of the experiment using meta‐analysis mixed models. The strength of associational effects declined with increasing plot size, regardless of the type of associational effects. Associational defenses (i.e., decrease in herbivory for focal plants associated with unpalatable neighbors) had stronger magnitude than associational susceptibilities. The high remaining heterogeneity among studies suggests that untested factors modulate associational effects, such as nutritional quality of focal and neighboring plants, density of herbivores, timing of browsing, etc. Associational effects are already considered in multiple restoration contexts worldwide, but a better understanding of these relationships could improve their use in conservation, restoration, and forest exploitation when browsing is a concern. This study is the first to investigate spatial patterns of associational effects across species and ecosystems, an issue that is essential to determine differential herbivory damages among plants.
topic associational resistance
attractant–decoy hypothesis
meta‐analysis
neighboring effects
plant–herbivore relationships; spatial scale
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1371
work_keys_str_mv AT emiliechampagne spatialextentofneighboringplantsinfluencesthestrengthofassociationaleffectsonmammalherbivory
AT jeanpierretremblay spatialextentofneighboringplantsinfluencesthestrengthofassociationaleffectsonmammalherbivory
AT steevedcote spatialextentofneighboringplantsinfluencesthestrengthofassociationaleffectsonmammalherbivory
_version_ 1725880949166571520