CAN ATYPYCAL EXECUTIVE MEASURES FIT THE SPECIAL COURTS?
From a decision that denied the use of the coercive measures in small claim courts based on celerity and informality, this article aims to analyze if the usage of atypical executive measures violates the fundamental regimental norms of state and district’ small plea courts. The research was made thr...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
2021-09-01
|
| Series: | Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/59111/39109 |
| Summary: | From a decision that denied the use of the coercive measures in small claim courts based on celerity and informality, this article aims to analyze if the usage of atypical executive measures violates the fundamental regimental norms of state and district’ small plea courts. The research was made through the analyses of doctrine and decisions about the theme debated, direct or indirectly. The conclusion was that the small claim courts are not only celerity or simplicity. And, furthermore, the application of atypical measures into these structures does not violate its core rules and it is not incongruous with Law 9.099/95. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1982-7636 |