Risk Evaluation of Sewage Treatment PPPABS Projects Using Combination Weight Method and D-S Evidence Theory
In order to make up for the shortage of public-private partnership (PPP) model, more and more sewage treatment PPP projects have adopted the asset-backed securitization (ABS) model. To ensure success of sewage treatment PPPABS projects, risk evaluation, which has remained scarcity and unscientific,...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi-Wiley
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Complexity |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4167130 |
id |
doaj-9b00ed6319c84a3898d3bc0576191e9a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9b00ed6319c84a3898d3bc0576191e9a2020-11-25T03:16:24ZengHindawi-WileyComplexity1076-27871099-05262020-01-01202010.1155/2020/41671304167130Risk Evaluation of Sewage Treatment PPPABS Projects Using Combination Weight Method and D-S Evidence TheoryHui Zhao0Zehui Bu1Shengbin Ma2School of Management Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, ChinaSchool of Management Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, ChinaSchool of Management Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, ChinaIn order to make up for the shortage of public-private partnership (PPP) model, more and more sewage treatment PPP projects have adopted the asset-backed securitization (ABS) model. To ensure success of sewage treatment PPPABS projects, risk evaluation, which has remained scarcity and unscientific, is becoming an urgent problem to be solved. Firstly, this paper identifies critical risk factors by literature analysis and expert interview. The final risk system is established from the perspectives of macrorisks, basic asset risks, transaction structure risks, operational risks, and other risks, which include 17 second risk factors. Then, the overall risk evaluation method is proposed based on combination weight method and Dempster–Shafer (D-S) evidence theory. Next, Beijing capital Co. Ltd. sewage treatment PPPABS project as a case is employed to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. Finally, awareness of existing risks, suggestions from law risk, quality risk, underwriting and issue risk, and credit enhancement are provided for sewage treatment PPPABS projects. All above studies are expected to provide helpful references for evaluating overall risk of sewage treatment PPPABS projects.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4167130 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hui Zhao Zehui Bu Shengbin Ma |
spellingShingle |
Hui Zhao Zehui Bu Shengbin Ma Risk Evaluation of Sewage Treatment PPPABS Projects Using Combination Weight Method and D-S Evidence Theory Complexity |
author_facet |
Hui Zhao Zehui Bu Shengbin Ma |
author_sort |
Hui Zhao |
title |
Risk Evaluation of Sewage Treatment PPPABS Projects Using Combination Weight Method and D-S Evidence Theory |
title_short |
Risk Evaluation of Sewage Treatment PPPABS Projects Using Combination Weight Method and D-S Evidence Theory |
title_full |
Risk Evaluation of Sewage Treatment PPPABS Projects Using Combination Weight Method and D-S Evidence Theory |
title_fullStr |
Risk Evaluation of Sewage Treatment PPPABS Projects Using Combination Weight Method and D-S Evidence Theory |
title_full_unstemmed |
Risk Evaluation of Sewage Treatment PPPABS Projects Using Combination Weight Method and D-S Evidence Theory |
title_sort |
risk evaluation of sewage treatment pppabs projects using combination weight method and d-s evidence theory |
publisher |
Hindawi-Wiley |
series |
Complexity |
issn |
1076-2787 1099-0526 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
In order to make up for the shortage of public-private partnership (PPP) model, more and more sewage treatment PPP projects have adopted the asset-backed securitization (ABS) model. To ensure success of sewage treatment PPPABS projects, risk evaluation, which has remained scarcity and unscientific, is becoming an urgent problem to be solved. Firstly, this paper identifies critical risk factors by literature analysis and expert interview. The final risk system is established from the perspectives of macrorisks, basic asset risks, transaction structure risks, operational risks, and other risks, which include 17 second risk factors. Then, the overall risk evaluation method is proposed based on combination weight method and Dempster–Shafer (D-S) evidence theory. Next, Beijing capital Co. Ltd. sewage treatment PPPABS project as a case is employed to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. Finally, awareness of existing risks, suggestions from law risk, quality risk, underwriting and issue risk, and credit enhancement are provided for sewage treatment PPPABS projects. All above studies are expected to provide helpful references for evaluating overall risk of sewage treatment PPPABS projects. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4167130 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT huizhao riskevaluationofsewagetreatmentpppabsprojectsusingcombinationweightmethodanddsevidencetheory AT zehuibu riskevaluationofsewagetreatmentpppabsprojectsusingcombinationweightmethodanddsevidencetheory AT shengbinma riskevaluationofsewagetreatmentpppabsprojectsusingcombinationweightmethodanddsevidencetheory |
_version_ |
1715262848049872896 |