Risk Evaluation of Sewage Treatment PPPABS Projects Using Combination Weight Method and D-S Evidence Theory

In order to make up for the shortage of public-private partnership (PPP) model, more and more sewage treatment PPP projects have adopted the asset-backed securitization (ABS) model. To ensure success of sewage treatment PPPABS projects, risk evaluation, which has remained scarcity and unscientific,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hui Zhao, Zehui Bu, Shengbin Ma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi-Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Complexity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4167130
id doaj-9b00ed6319c84a3898d3bc0576191e9a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9b00ed6319c84a3898d3bc0576191e9a2020-11-25T03:16:24ZengHindawi-WileyComplexity1076-27871099-05262020-01-01202010.1155/2020/41671304167130Risk Evaluation of Sewage Treatment PPPABS Projects Using Combination Weight Method and D-S Evidence TheoryHui Zhao0Zehui Bu1Shengbin Ma2School of Management Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, ChinaSchool of Management Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, ChinaSchool of Management Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, ChinaIn order to make up for the shortage of public-private partnership (PPP) model, more and more sewage treatment PPP projects have adopted the asset-backed securitization (ABS) model. To ensure success of sewage treatment PPPABS projects, risk evaluation, which has remained scarcity and unscientific, is becoming an urgent problem to be solved. Firstly, this paper identifies critical risk factors by literature analysis and expert interview. The final risk system is established from the perspectives of macrorisks, basic asset risks, transaction structure risks, operational risks, and other risks, which include 17 second risk factors. Then, the overall risk evaluation method is proposed based on combination weight method and Dempster–Shafer (D-S) evidence theory. Next, Beijing capital Co. Ltd. sewage treatment PPPABS project as a case is employed to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. Finally, awareness of existing risks, suggestions from law risk, quality risk, underwriting and issue risk, and credit enhancement are provided for sewage treatment PPPABS projects. All above studies are expected to provide helpful references for evaluating overall risk of sewage treatment PPPABS projects.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4167130
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hui Zhao
Zehui Bu
Shengbin Ma
spellingShingle Hui Zhao
Zehui Bu
Shengbin Ma
Risk Evaluation of Sewage Treatment PPPABS Projects Using Combination Weight Method and D-S Evidence Theory
Complexity
author_facet Hui Zhao
Zehui Bu
Shengbin Ma
author_sort Hui Zhao
title Risk Evaluation of Sewage Treatment PPPABS Projects Using Combination Weight Method and D-S Evidence Theory
title_short Risk Evaluation of Sewage Treatment PPPABS Projects Using Combination Weight Method and D-S Evidence Theory
title_full Risk Evaluation of Sewage Treatment PPPABS Projects Using Combination Weight Method and D-S Evidence Theory
title_fullStr Risk Evaluation of Sewage Treatment PPPABS Projects Using Combination Weight Method and D-S Evidence Theory
title_full_unstemmed Risk Evaluation of Sewage Treatment PPPABS Projects Using Combination Weight Method and D-S Evidence Theory
title_sort risk evaluation of sewage treatment pppabs projects using combination weight method and d-s evidence theory
publisher Hindawi-Wiley
series Complexity
issn 1076-2787
1099-0526
publishDate 2020-01-01
description In order to make up for the shortage of public-private partnership (PPP) model, more and more sewage treatment PPP projects have adopted the asset-backed securitization (ABS) model. To ensure success of sewage treatment PPPABS projects, risk evaluation, which has remained scarcity and unscientific, is becoming an urgent problem to be solved. Firstly, this paper identifies critical risk factors by literature analysis and expert interview. The final risk system is established from the perspectives of macrorisks, basic asset risks, transaction structure risks, operational risks, and other risks, which include 17 second risk factors. Then, the overall risk evaluation method is proposed based on combination weight method and Dempster–Shafer (D-S) evidence theory. Next, Beijing capital Co. Ltd. sewage treatment PPPABS project as a case is employed to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. Finally, awareness of existing risks, suggestions from law risk, quality risk, underwriting and issue risk, and credit enhancement are provided for sewage treatment PPPABS projects. All above studies are expected to provide helpful references for evaluating overall risk of sewage treatment PPPABS projects.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4167130
work_keys_str_mv AT huizhao riskevaluationofsewagetreatmentpppabsprojectsusingcombinationweightmethodanddsevidencetheory
AT zehuibu riskevaluationofsewagetreatmentpppabsprojectsusingcombinationweightmethodanddsevidencetheory
AT shengbinma riskevaluationofsewagetreatmentpppabsprojectsusingcombinationweightmethodanddsevidencetheory
_version_ 1715262848049872896