Estimating the Period Prevalence of Mothers Who Have Abortions: A Population Based Study of Inclusive Pregnancy Outcomes
Introduction: The prevalence of induced abortion among women with children has been estimated indirectly by projections derived from survey research. However, an empirically derived, population-based conclusion on this question is absent from the published literature. Objective: The objective of thi...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Health Services Research & Managerial Epidemiology |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/23333928211034993 |
id |
doaj-9ad831a16f924ffeb6501134d8dfa414 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9ad831a16f924ffeb6501134d8dfa4142021-07-23T21:33:28ZengSAGE PublishingHealth Services Research & Managerial Epidemiology2333-39282021-07-01810.1177/23333928211034993Estimating the Period Prevalence of Mothers Who Have Abortions: A Population Based Study of Inclusive Pregnancy OutcomesJames Studnicki0John W. Fisher1Tessa Longbons2David C. Reardon3Donna J. Harrison4Christopher Craver5Maka Tsulukidze6Ingrid Skop7 Charlotte Lozier Institute, Arlington, VA, USA Charlotte Lozier Institute, Arlington, VA, USA Charlotte Lozier Institute, Arlington, VA, USA Elliot Institute, Springfield, IL, USA American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Eau Claire, MI, USA Charlotte Lozier Institute, Arlington, VA, USA Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL, USA Charlotte Lozier Institute, Arlington, VA, USAIntroduction: The prevalence of induced abortion among women with children has been estimated indirectly by projections derived from survey research. However, an empirically derived, population-based conclusion on this question is absent from the published literature. Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the period prevalence of abortion among all other possible pregnancy outcomes within the reproductive histories of Medicaid-eligible women in the U.S. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional, longitudinal analysis of the pregnancy outcome sequences of eligible women over age 13 from the 17 states where Medicaid included coverage of most abortions, with at least one identifiable pregnancy between 1999 and 2014. A total of 1360 pregnancy outcome sequences were grouped into 8 categories which characterize various combinations of the 4 possible pregnancy outcomes: birth, abortion, natural loss, and undetermined loss. The reproductive histories of 4,884,101 women representing 7,799,784 pregnancy outcomes were distributed into these categories. Results: Women who had live births but no abortions or undetermined pregnancy losses represented 74.2% of the study population and accounted for 87.6% of total births. Women who have only abortions but no births constitute 6.6% of the study population, but they are 53.5% of women with abortions and have 51.5% of all abortions. Women with both births and abortions represent 5.7% of the study population and have 7.2% of total births. Conclusion: Abortion among low-income women with children is exceedingly uncommon, if not rare. The period prevalence of mothers without abortion is 13 times that of mothers with abortion.https://doi.org/10.1177/23333928211034993 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
James Studnicki John W. Fisher Tessa Longbons David C. Reardon Donna J. Harrison Christopher Craver Maka Tsulukidze Ingrid Skop |
spellingShingle |
James Studnicki John W. Fisher Tessa Longbons David C. Reardon Donna J. Harrison Christopher Craver Maka Tsulukidze Ingrid Skop Estimating the Period Prevalence of Mothers Who Have Abortions: A Population Based Study of Inclusive Pregnancy Outcomes Health Services Research & Managerial Epidemiology |
author_facet |
James Studnicki John W. Fisher Tessa Longbons David C. Reardon Donna J. Harrison Christopher Craver Maka Tsulukidze Ingrid Skop |
author_sort |
James Studnicki |
title |
Estimating the Period Prevalence of Mothers Who Have Abortions: A Population Based Study of Inclusive Pregnancy Outcomes |
title_short |
Estimating the Period Prevalence of Mothers Who Have Abortions: A Population Based Study of Inclusive Pregnancy Outcomes |
title_full |
Estimating the Period Prevalence of Mothers Who Have Abortions: A Population Based Study of Inclusive Pregnancy Outcomes |
title_fullStr |
Estimating the Period Prevalence of Mothers Who Have Abortions: A Population Based Study of Inclusive Pregnancy Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Estimating the Period Prevalence of Mothers Who Have Abortions: A Population Based Study of Inclusive Pregnancy Outcomes |
title_sort |
estimating the period prevalence of mothers who have abortions: a population based study of inclusive pregnancy outcomes |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Health Services Research & Managerial Epidemiology |
issn |
2333-3928 |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
Introduction: The prevalence of induced abortion among women with children has been estimated indirectly by projections derived from survey research. However, an empirically derived, population-based conclusion on this question is absent from the published literature. Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the period prevalence of abortion among all other possible pregnancy outcomes within the reproductive histories of Medicaid-eligible women in the U.S. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional, longitudinal analysis of the pregnancy outcome sequences of eligible women over age 13 from the 17 states where Medicaid included coverage of most abortions, with at least one identifiable pregnancy between 1999 and 2014. A total of 1360 pregnancy outcome sequences were grouped into 8 categories which characterize various combinations of the 4 possible pregnancy outcomes: birth, abortion, natural loss, and undetermined loss. The reproductive histories of 4,884,101 women representing 7,799,784 pregnancy outcomes were distributed into these categories. Results: Women who had live births but no abortions or undetermined pregnancy losses represented 74.2% of the study population and accounted for 87.6% of total births. Women who have only abortions but no births constitute 6.6% of the study population, but they are 53.5% of women with abortions and have 51.5% of all abortions. Women with both births and abortions represent 5.7% of the study population and have 7.2% of total births. Conclusion: Abortion among low-income women with children is exceedingly uncommon, if not rare. The period prevalence of mothers without abortion is 13 times that of mothers with abortion. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/23333928211034993 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jamesstudnicki estimatingtheperiodprevalenceofmotherswhohaveabortionsapopulationbasedstudyofinclusivepregnancyoutcomes AT johnwfisher estimatingtheperiodprevalenceofmotherswhohaveabortionsapopulationbasedstudyofinclusivepregnancyoutcomes AT tessalongbons estimatingtheperiodprevalenceofmotherswhohaveabortionsapopulationbasedstudyofinclusivepregnancyoutcomes AT davidcreardon estimatingtheperiodprevalenceofmotherswhohaveabortionsapopulationbasedstudyofinclusivepregnancyoutcomes AT donnajharrison estimatingtheperiodprevalenceofmotherswhohaveabortionsapopulationbasedstudyofinclusivepregnancyoutcomes AT christophercraver estimatingtheperiodprevalenceofmotherswhohaveabortionsapopulationbasedstudyofinclusivepregnancyoutcomes AT makatsulukidze estimatingtheperiodprevalenceofmotherswhohaveabortionsapopulationbasedstudyofinclusivepregnancyoutcomes AT ingridskop estimatingtheperiodprevalenceofmotherswhohaveabortionsapopulationbasedstudyofinclusivepregnancyoutcomes |
_version_ |
1721284489749987328 |