Estimating the Period Prevalence of Mothers Who Have Abortions: A Population Based Study of Inclusive Pregnancy Outcomes

Introduction: The prevalence of induced abortion among women with children has been estimated indirectly by projections derived from survey research. However, an empirically derived, population-based conclusion on this question is absent from the published literature. Objective: The objective of thi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James Studnicki, John W. Fisher, Tessa Longbons, David C. Reardon, Donna J. Harrison, Christopher Craver, Maka Tsulukidze, Ingrid Skop
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-07-01
Series:Health Services Research & Managerial Epidemiology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/23333928211034993
id doaj-9ad831a16f924ffeb6501134d8dfa414
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9ad831a16f924ffeb6501134d8dfa4142021-07-23T21:33:28ZengSAGE PublishingHealth Services Research & Managerial Epidemiology2333-39282021-07-01810.1177/23333928211034993Estimating the Period Prevalence of Mothers Who Have Abortions: A Population Based Study of Inclusive Pregnancy OutcomesJames Studnicki0John W. Fisher1Tessa Longbons2David C. Reardon3Donna J. Harrison4Christopher Craver5Maka Tsulukidze6Ingrid Skop7 Charlotte Lozier Institute, Arlington, VA, USA Charlotte Lozier Institute, Arlington, VA, USA Charlotte Lozier Institute, Arlington, VA, USA Elliot Institute, Springfield, IL, USA American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Eau Claire, MI, USA Charlotte Lozier Institute, Arlington, VA, USA Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL, USA Charlotte Lozier Institute, Arlington, VA, USAIntroduction: The prevalence of induced abortion among women with children has been estimated indirectly by projections derived from survey research. However, an empirically derived, population-based conclusion on this question is absent from the published literature. Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the period prevalence of abortion among all other possible pregnancy outcomes within the reproductive histories of Medicaid-eligible women in the U.S. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional, longitudinal analysis of the pregnancy outcome sequences of eligible women over age 13 from the 17 states where Medicaid included coverage of most abortions, with at least one identifiable pregnancy between 1999 and 2014. A total of 1360 pregnancy outcome sequences were grouped into 8 categories which characterize various combinations of the 4 possible pregnancy outcomes: birth, abortion, natural loss, and undetermined loss. The reproductive histories of 4,884,101 women representing 7,799,784 pregnancy outcomes were distributed into these categories. Results: Women who had live births but no abortions or undetermined pregnancy losses represented 74.2% of the study population and accounted for 87.6% of total births. Women who have only abortions but no births constitute 6.6% of the study population, but they are 53.5% of women with abortions and have 51.5% of all abortions. Women with both births and abortions represent 5.7% of the study population and have 7.2% of total births. Conclusion: Abortion among low-income women with children is exceedingly uncommon, if not rare. The period prevalence of mothers without abortion is 13 times that of mothers with abortion.https://doi.org/10.1177/23333928211034993
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James Studnicki
John W. Fisher
Tessa Longbons
David C. Reardon
Donna J. Harrison
Christopher Craver
Maka Tsulukidze
Ingrid Skop
spellingShingle James Studnicki
John W. Fisher
Tessa Longbons
David C. Reardon
Donna J. Harrison
Christopher Craver
Maka Tsulukidze
Ingrid Skop
Estimating the Period Prevalence of Mothers Who Have Abortions: A Population Based Study of Inclusive Pregnancy Outcomes
Health Services Research & Managerial Epidemiology
author_facet James Studnicki
John W. Fisher
Tessa Longbons
David C. Reardon
Donna J. Harrison
Christopher Craver
Maka Tsulukidze
Ingrid Skop
author_sort James Studnicki
title Estimating the Period Prevalence of Mothers Who Have Abortions: A Population Based Study of Inclusive Pregnancy Outcomes
title_short Estimating the Period Prevalence of Mothers Who Have Abortions: A Population Based Study of Inclusive Pregnancy Outcomes
title_full Estimating the Period Prevalence of Mothers Who Have Abortions: A Population Based Study of Inclusive Pregnancy Outcomes
title_fullStr Estimating the Period Prevalence of Mothers Who Have Abortions: A Population Based Study of Inclusive Pregnancy Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the Period Prevalence of Mothers Who Have Abortions: A Population Based Study of Inclusive Pregnancy Outcomes
title_sort estimating the period prevalence of mothers who have abortions: a population based study of inclusive pregnancy outcomes
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Health Services Research & Managerial Epidemiology
issn 2333-3928
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Introduction: The prevalence of induced abortion among women with children has been estimated indirectly by projections derived from survey research. However, an empirically derived, population-based conclusion on this question is absent from the published literature. Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the period prevalence of abortion among all other possible pregnancy outcomes within the reproductive histories of Medicaid-eligible women in the U.S. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional, longitudinal analysis of the pregnancy outcome sequences of eligible women over age 13 from the 17 states where Medicaid included coverage of most abortions, with at least one identifiable pregnancy between 1999 and 2014. A total of 1360 pregnancy outcome sequences were grouped into 8 categories which characterize various combinations of the 4 possible pregnancy outcomes: birth, abortion, natural loss, and undetermined loss. The reproductive histories of 4,884,101 women representing 7,799,784 pregnancy outcomes were distributed into these categories. Results: Women who had live births but no abortions or undetermined pregnancy losses represented 74.2% of the study population and accounted for 87.6% of total births. Women who have only abortions but no births constitute 6.6% of the study population, but they are 53.5% of women with abortions and have 51.5% of all abortions. Women with both births and abortions represent 5.7% of the study population and have 7.2% of total births. Conclusion: Abortion among low-income women with children is exceedingly uncommon, if not rare. The period prevalence of mothers without abortion is 13 times that of mothers with abortion.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/23333928211034993
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesstudnicki estimatingtheperiodprevalenceofmotherswhohaveabortionsapopulationbasedstudyofinclusivepregnancyoutcomes
AT johnwfisher estimatingtheperiodprevalenceofmotherswhohaveabortionsapopulationbasedstudyofinclusivepregnancyoutcomes
AT tessalongbons estimatingtheperiodprevalenceofmotherswhohaveabortionsapopulationbasedstudyofinclusivepregnancyoutcomes
AT davidcreardon estimatingtheperiodprevalenceofmotherswhohaveabortionsapopulationbasedstudyofinclusivepregnancyoutcomes
AT donnajharrison estimatingtheperiodprevalenceofmotherswhohaveabortionsapopulationbasedstudyofinclusivepregnancyoutcomes
AT christophercraver estimatingtheperiodprevalenceofmotherswhohaveabortionsapopulationbasedstudyofinclusivepregnancyoutcomes
AT makatsulukidze estimatingtheperiodprevalenceofmotherswhohaveabortionsapopulationbasedstudyofinclusivepregnancyoutcomes
AT ingridskop estimatingtheperiodprevalenceofmotherswhohaveabortionsapopulationbasedstudyofinclusivepregnancyoutcomes
_version_ 1721284489749987328