What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA?
Geographic Education in the United States generally receives less attention than many other subjects, and surveys have found that most students lack proficiency. The resulting level of geographic literacy in the general population carries significant implications for national and international compe...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri
2017-06-01
|
Series: | Revista Espinhaço |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.revistaespinhaco.com/index.php/journal/article/view/152/120 |
id |
doaj-9ac16a4390874768ac2a8daadd3db8f2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9ac16a4390874768ac2a8daadd3db8f22020-11-25T00:10:16ZengUniversidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e MucuriRevista Espinhaço2317-06112017-06-01614149What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA?Michael J. Passow0Columbia UniversityGeographic Education in the United States generally receives less attention than many other subjects, and surveys have found that most students lack proficiency. The resulting level of geographic literacy in the general population carries significant implications for national and international competitiveness and decision-making. This paper reviews factors leading to deficiencies in US Geography Education, including lack of emphasis compared with subjects more prominently tested, teacher preparation and in-service training, curricula design, and high student mobility rates. We also review positive trends, including developing more rigorous sets of learning standards and geographic skills, and support from interested organizations and State educational agencies for encouraging student interest and participation in assessments and contests. We examine selective resources for teaching and learning geographic concepts and skills, many available online from federal and nongovernmental agencies. Finally, we consider the potential for learning geography through such informal science education venues as museums and mass media.http://www.revistaespinhaco.com/index.php/journal/article/view/152/120geography educationUnited Statesgeographic literacydeficienciespositive trends |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Michael J. Passow |
spellingShingle |
Michael J. Passow What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA? Revista Espinhaço geography education United States geographic literacy deficiencies positive trends |
author_facet |
Michael J. Passow |
author_sort |
Michael J. Passow |
title |
What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA? |
title_short |
What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA? |
title_full |
What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA? |
title_fullStr |
What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA? |
title_full_unstemmed |
What’s Wrong and What’s Right with Geography Education in the USA? |
title_sort |
what’s wrong and what’s right with geography education in the usa? |
publisher |
Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri |
series |
Revista Espinhaço |
issn |
2317-0611 |
publishDate |
2017-06-01 |
description |
Geographic Education in the United States generally receives less attention than many other subjects, and surveys have found that most students lack proficiency. The resulting level of geographic literacy in the general population carries significant implications for national and international competitiveness and decision-making. This paper reviews factors leading to deficiencies in US Geography Education, including lack of emphasis compared with subjects more prominently tested, teacher preparation and in-service training, curricula design, and high student mobility rates. We also review positive trends, including developing more rigorous sets of learning standards and geographic skills, and support from interested organizations and State educational agencies for encouraging student interest and participation in assessments and contests. We examine selective resources for teaching and learning geographic concepts and skills, many available online from federal and nongovernmental agencies. Finally, we consider the potential for learning geography through such informal science education venues as museums and mass media. |
topic |
geography education United States geographic literacy deficiencies positive trends |
url |
http://www.revistaespinhaco.com/index.php/journal/article/view/152/120 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michaeljpassow whatswrongandwhatsrightwithgeographyeducationintheusa |
_version_ |
1716214793401008128 |