Cooptation or resistance? Problematizing the legal strategies and rights of social movements in the socio-economic domain

This paper elaborates an analytical template to problematize the politics of legal strategies and rights. In the literature, scholars have been arguing that courts have an individualizing effect on collective struggles, or that (human) rights constitute neoliberal subjects. Yet, it is possible to op...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alberto FIERRO
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid 2018-08-01
Series:Relaciones Internacionales
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.uam.es/relacionesinternacionales/article/view/9412
id doaj-9abf28819c2047439cb59a218f624265
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9abf28819c2047439cb59a218f6242652020-11-25T02:44:05ZspaUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid Relaciones Internacionales1699-39502018-08-01398110110.15366/relacionesinternacionales2018.39.0058675Cooptation or resistance? Problematizing the legal strategies and rights of social movements in the socio-economic domainAlberto FIERRO0Escuela Doctoral de Ciencia Política, Políticas Públicas y Relaciones Internacionales, Central European UniversityThis paper elaborates an analytical template to problematize the politics of legal strategies and rights. In the literature, scholars have been arguing that courts have an individualizing effect on collective struggles, or that (human) rights constitute neoliberal subjects. Yet, it is possible to open this theoretical understanding to further complexities: the inclusion of movements into certain governmentalities may have positive effects for their struggle. The discussion follows two main argumentative axes: first, social movements using legal tools and rights language are possibly deploying strategies of ‘counter-conducts’: exactly because the law is part and parcel of neoliberal governmentalities, it can constitute a strategic element to redirect and subvert established power relationships. Second, rights in the socio-economic domain (e.g. labor, housing and land) have specific properties which work against economic neoliberalism. Following a classic Polanyian argument, the idea of socio-economic rights pulls away these goods from the market domain. This creates difficulties to the capitalist economic system, which is based on a rather strict conception of land and housing as commodities.https://revistas.uam.es/relacionesinternacionales/article/view/9412rightssocial movementscounterconductslegal strategiesgovernmentality
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alberto FIERRO
spellingShingle Alberto FIERRO
Cooptation or resistance? Problematizing the legal strategies and rights of social movements in the socio-economic domain
Relaciones Internacionales
rights
social movements
counterconducts
legal strategies
governmentality
author_facet Alberto FIERRO
author_sort Alberto FIERRO
title Cooptation or resistance? Problematizing the legal strategies and rights of social movements in the socio-economic domain
title_short Cooptation or resistance? Problematizing the legal strategies and rights of social movements in the socio-economic domain
title_full Cooptation or resistance? Problematizing the legal strategies and rights of social movements in the socio-economic domain
title_fullStr Cooptation or resistance? Problematizing the legal strategies and rights of social movements in the socio-economic domain
title_full_unstemmed Cooptation or resistance? Problematizing the legal strategies and rights of social movements in the socio-economic domain
title_sort cooptation or resistance? problematizing the legal strategies and rights of social movements in the socio-economic domain
publisher Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
series Relaciones Internacionales
issn 1699-3950
publishDate 2018-08-01
description This paper elaborates an analytical template to problematize the politics of legal strategies and rights. In the literature, scholars have been arguing that courts have an individualizing effect on collective struggles, or that (human) rights constitute neoliberal subjects. Yet, it is possible to open this theoretical understanding to further complexities: the inclusion of movements into certain governmentalities may have positive effects for their struggle. The discussion follows two main argumentative axes: first, social movements using legal tools and rights language are possibly deploying strategies of ‘counter-conducts’: exactly because the law is part and parcel of neoliberal governmentalities, it can constitute a strategic element to redirect and subvert established power relationships. Second, rights in the socio-economic domain (e.g. labor, housing and land) have specific properties which work against economic neoliberalism. Following a classic Polanyian argument, the idea of socio-economic rights pulls away these goods from the market domain. This creates difficulties to the capitalist economic system, which is based on a rather strict conception of land and housing as commodities.
topic rights
social movements
counterconducts
legal strategies
governmentality
url https://revistas.uam.es/relacionesinternacionales/article/view/9412
work_keys_str_mv AT albertofierro cooptationorresistanceproblematizingthelegalstrategiesandrightsofsocialmovementsinthesocioeconomicdomain
_version_ 1724767559681572864