Uterine Carcinosarcoma in a Patient with Didelphys Uterus

Background. Didelphys uterus is a noncommon finding in women. Till now, few cases with benign mesenchymal tumors in patients with didelphys uterus are described. We present a case of a patient with carcinosarcoma arising in a didelphys uterus. Case. A 73-year-old patient presented with profuse water...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Iavazzo, F. Kokka, A. Sahdev, N. Singh, K. Reynolds
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/401962
id doaj-9aab30b318a04ff0b2c65c632ff337ec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9aab30b318a04ff0b2c65c632ff337ec2020-11-24T23:49:35ZengHindawi LimitedCase Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology2090-66842090-66922013-01-01201310.1155/2013/401962401962Uterine Carcinosarcoma in a Patient with Didelphys UterusC. Iavazzo0F. Kokka1A. Sahdev2N. Singh3K. Reynolds4Gynaecological Department, St Bartholomews Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UKGynaecological Department, St Bartholomews Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UKGynaecological Department, St Bartholomews Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UKGynaecological Department, St Bartholomews Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UKGynaecological Department, St Bartholomews Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UKBackground. Didelphys uterus is a noncommon finding in women. Till now, few cases with benign mesenchymal tumors in patients with didelphys uterus are described. We present a case of a patient with carcinosarcoma arising in a didelphys uterus. Case. A 73-year-old patient presented with profuse watery postmenopausal bleeding. On examination under anesthesia, left and right cervixes were identified. Tumor extended from the left cervix into the lower third of the vagina and was adherent to the right vaginal sidewall. There was no evidence of parametrial extension. Tissue was sent for biopsy which revealed high-grade uterine carcinosarcoma. Two uterine fundi and two vaginas in keeping with uterine didelphys were identified on imaging. The patient underwent vaginal excision of the protruding tumor measuring  cm with harmonic scalpel followed by total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingooophorectomy. Although a number of pelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes were also identified on imaging, she was not planned for lymphadenectomy after MDT (multidisciplinary team) discussion because of her comorbidities. The final histology confirmed the diagnosis. Conclusion. According to our knowledge, this is the second case of carcinosarcoma arising in didelphys uterus in the world literature.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/401962
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author C. Iavazzo
F. Kokka
A. Sahdev
N. Singh
K. Reynolds
spellingShingle C. Iavazzo
F. Kokka
A. Sahdev
N. Singh
K. Reynolds
Uterine Carcinosarcoma in a Patient with Didelphys Uterus
Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology
author_facet C. Iavazzo
F. Kokka
A. Sahdev
N. Singh
K. Reynolds
author_sort C. Iavazzo
title Uterine Carcinosarcoma in a Patient with Didelphys Uterus
title_short Uterine Carcinosarcoma in a Patient with Didelphys Uterus
title_full Uterine Carcinosarcoma in a Patient with Didelphys Uterus
title_fullStr Uterine Carcinosarcoma in a Patient with Didelphys Uterus
title_full_unstemmed Uterine Carcinosarcoma in a Patient with Didelphys Uterus
title_sort uterine carcinosarcoma in a patient with didelphys uterus
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology
issn 2090-6684
2090-6692
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Background. Didelphys uterus is a noncommon finding in women. Till now, few cases with benign mesenchymal tumors in patients with didelphys uterus are described. We present a case of a patient with carcinosarcoma arising in a didelphys uterus. Case. A 73-year-old patient presented with profuse watery postmenopausal bleeding. On examination under anesthesia, left and right cervixes were identified. Tumor extended from the left cervix into the lower third of the vagina and was adherent to the right vaginal sidewall. There was no evidence of parametrial extension. Tissue was sent for biopsy which revealed high-grade uterine carcinosarcoma. Two uterine fundi and two vaginas in keeping with uterine didelphys were identified on imaging. The patient underwent vaginal excision of the protruding tumor measuring  cm with harmonic scalpel followed by total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingooophorectomy. Although a number of pelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes were also identified on imaging, she was not planned for lymphadenectomy after MDT (multidisciplinary team) discussion because of her comorbidities. The final histology confirmed the diagnosis. Conclusion. According to our knowledge, this is the second case of carcinosarcoma arising in didelphys uterus in the world literature.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/401962
work_keys_str_mv AT ciavazzo uterinecarcinosarcomainapatientwithdidelphysuterus
AT fkokka uterinecarcinosarcomainapatientwithdidelphysuterus
AT asahdev uterinecarcinosarcomainapatientwithdidelphysuterus
AT nsingh uterinecarcinosarcomainapatientwithdidelphysuterus
AT kreynolds uterinecarcinosarcomainapatientwithdidelphysuterus
_version_ 1725481733174853632