Uterine Carcinosarcoma in a Patient with Didelphys Uterus
Background. Didelphys uterus is a noncommon finding in women. Till now, few cases with benign mesenchymal tumors in patients with didelphys uterus are described. We present a case of a patient with carcinosarcoma arising in a didelphys uterus. Case. A 73-year-old patient presented with profuse water...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2013-01-01
|
Series: | Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/401962 |
id |
doaj-9aab30b318a04ff0b2c65c632ff337ec |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9aab30b318a04ff0b2c65c632ff337ec2020-11-24T23:49:35ZengHindawi LimitedCase Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology2090-66842090-66922013-01-01201310.1155/2013/401962401962Uterine Carcinosarcoma in a Patient with Didelphys UterusC. Iavazzo0F. Kokka1A. Sahdev2N. Singh3K. Reynolds4Gynaecological Department, St Bartholomews Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UKGynaecological Department, St Bartholomews Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UKGynaecological Department, St Bartholomews Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UKGynaecological Department, St Bartholomews Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UKGynaecological Department, St Bartholomews Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UKBackground. Didelphys uterus is a noncommon finding in women. Till now, few cases with benign mesenchymal tumors in patients with didelphys uterus are described. We present a case of a patient with carcinosarcoma arising in a didelphys uterus. Case. A 73-year-old patient presented with profuse watery postmenopausal bleeding. On examination under anesthesia, left and right cervixes were identified. Tumor extended from the left cervix into the lower third of the vagina and was adherent to the right vaginal sidewall. There was no evidence of parametrial extension. Tissue was sent for biopsy which revealed high-grade uterine carcinosarcoma. Two uterine fundi and two vaginas in keeping with uterine didelphys were identified on imaging. The patient underwent vaginal excision of the protruding tumor measuring cm with harmonic scalpel followed by total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingooophorectomy. Although a number of pelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes were also identified on imaging, she was not planned for lymphadenectomy after MDT (multidisciplinary team) discussion because of her comorbidities. The final histology confirmed the diagnosis. Conclusion. According to our knowledge, this is the second case of carcinosarcoma arising in didelphys uterus in the world literature.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/401962 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
C. Iavazzo F. Kokka A. Sahdev N. Singh K. Reynolds |
spellingShingle |
C. Iavazzo F. Kokka A. Sahdev N. Singh K. Reynolds Uterine Carcinosarcoma in a Patient with Didelphys Uterus Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology |
author_facet |
C. Iavazzo F. Kokka A. Sahdev N. Singh K. Reynolds |
author_sort |
C. Iavazzo |
title |
Uterine Carcinosarcoma in a Patient with Didelphys Uterus |
title_short |
Uterine Carcinosarcoma in a Patient with Didelphys Uterus |
title_full |
Uterine Carcinosarcoma in a Patient with Didelphys Uterus |
title_fullStr |
Uterine Carcinosarcoma in a Patient with Didelphys Uterus |
title_full_unstemmed |
Uterine Carcinosarcoma in a Patient with Didelphys Uterus |
title_sort |
uterine carcinosarcoma in a patient with didelphys uterus |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology |
issn |
2090-6684 2090-6692 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
Background. Didelphys uterus is a noncommon finding in women. Till now, few cases with benign mesenchymal tumors in patients with didelphys uterus are described. We present a case of a patient with carcinosarcoma arising in a didelphys uterus. Case. A 73-year-old patient presented with profuse watery postmenopausal bleeding. On examination under anesthesia, left and right cervixes were identified. Tumor extended from the left cervix into the lower third of the vagina and was adherent to the right vaginal sidewall. There was no evidence of parametrial extension. Tissue was sent for biopsy which revealed high-grade uterine carcinosarcoma. Two uterine fundi and two vaginas in keeping with uterine didelphys were identified on imaging. The patient underwent vaginal excision of the protruding tumor measuring cm with harmonic scalpel followed by total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingooophorectomy. Although a number of pelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes were also identified on imaging, she was not planned for lymphadenectomy after MDT (multidisciplinary team) discussion because of her comorbidities. The final histology confirmed the diagnosis. Conclusion. According to our knowledge, this is the second case of carcinosarcoma arising in didelphys uterus in the world literature. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/401962 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ciavazzo uterinecarcinosarcomainapatientwithdidelphysuterus AT fkokka uterinecarcinosarcomainapatientwithdidelphysuterus AT asahdev uterinecarcinosarcomainapatientwithdidelphysuterus AT nsingh uterinecarcinosarcomainapatientwithdidelphysuterus AT kreynolds uterinecarcinosarcomainapatientwithdidelphysuterus |
_version_ |
1725481733174853632 |