The Slovene neo-circumflex revisited
Keith Langston disagrees with my account of the Slovene neo-circumflex. He rejects compensatory lengthening as an explanation of the neo-circumflex, primarily on theoretical grounds. His "moraic analysis" is quite unacceptable to me because it starts from an a priori segmentation of the sp...
Main Author: | Frederik Kortlandt |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Croatian |
Published: |
Institut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje
2012-01-01
|
Series: | Rasprave: Časopis Instituta za Hrvatski Jezik i Jezikoslovlje |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/142485 |
Similar Items
-
Proto-Slavic *j, Van Wijk’s Law, and ē-Stems
by: Frederik Kortlandt
Published: (2015-01-01) -
On the Accentuation of neslъ and Related Issues
by: Frederik Kortlandt
Published: (2014-01-01) -
On the rise of neo-acute *e and *o
by: Frederik Kortlandt
Published: (2016-01-01) -
On shortening, lengthening, and accent shifts in Slavic
by: Mate Kapović
Published: (2017-01-01) -
The hypothesis of a postpositional compensatory lengthening (so-called van Wijk’s law) vs. the relative chronology of Common Slavic phonological developments – in search of inconsistencies
by: Zbigniew Babik
Published: (2018-02-01)