The Slovene neo-circumflex revisited

Keith Langston disagrees with my account of the Slovene neo-circumflex. He rejects compensatory lengthening as an explanation of the neo-circumflex, primarily on theoretical grounds. His "moraic analysis" is quite unacceptable to me because it starts from an a priori segmentation of the sp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Frederik Kortlandt
Format: Article
Language:Croatian
Published: Institut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje 2012-01-01
Series:Rasprave: Časopis Instituta za Hrvatski Jezik i Jezikoslovlje
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/142485
id doaj-9aa4194b5aa44c7bae1f39882dcf567c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9aa4194b5aa44c7bae1f39882dcf567c2020-11-25T00:52:59ZhrvInstitut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovljeRasprave: Časopis Instituta za Hrvatski Jezik i Jezikoslovlje1331-67451849-03792012-01-01381117122The Slovene neo-circumflex revisitedFrederik Kortlandt0Department of comparative linguistics Leiden UniversityKeith Langston disagrees with my account of the Slovene neo-circumflex. He rejects compensatory lengthening as an explanation of the neo-circumflex, primarily on theoretical grounds. His "moraic analysis" is quite unacceptable to me because it starts from an a priori segmentation of the speech flow. In a strict autosegmental approach, the segmentation of the speech flow should be part of the analysis and not be given a priori. Langston's rejection of van Wijk's law, according to which the simplification of certain consonant clusters yielded lengthening of the following vowel, is based on a misguided theoretical interpretation which led him astray.http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/142485accentuationSlovene neo-cirkumflexacutecompensatory lengtheningvan Wijk's lawDybo's law
collection DOAJ
language Croatian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Frederik Kortlandt
spellingShingle Frederik Kortlandt
The Slovene neo-circumflex revisited
Rasprave: Časopis Instituta za Hrvatski Jezik i Jezikoslovlje
accentuation
Slovene neo-cirkumflex
acute
compensatory lengthening
van Wijk's law
Dybo's law
author_facet Frederik Kortlandt
author_sort Frederik Kortlandt
title The Slovene neo-circumflex revisited
title_short The Slovene neo-circumflex revisited
title_full The Slovene neo-circumflex revisited
title_fullStr The Slovene neo-circumflex revisited
title_full_unstemmed The Slovene neo-circumflex revisited
title_sort slovene neo-circumflex revisited
publisher Institut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje
series Rasprave: Časopis Instituta za Hrvatski Jezik i Jezikoslovlje
issn 1331-6745
1849-0379
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Keith Langston disagrees with my account of the Slovene neo-circumflex. He rejects compensatory lengthening as an explanation of the neo-circumflex, primarily on theoretical grounds. His "moraic analysis" is quite unacceptable to me because it starts from an a priori segmentation of the speech flow. In a strict autosegmental approach, the segmentation of the speech flow should be part of the analysis and not be given a priori. Langston's rejection of van Wijk's law, according to which the simplification of certain consonant clusters yielded lengthening of the following vowel, is based on a misguided theoretical interpretation which led him astray.
topic accentuation
Slovene neo-cirkumflex
acute
compensatory lengthening
van Wijk's law
Dybo's law
url http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/142485
work_keys_str_mv AT frederikkortlandt thesloveneneocircumflexrevisited
AT frederikkortlandt sloveneneocircumflexrevisited
_version_ 1725239815427850240