The Slovene neo-circumflex revisited
Keith Langston disagrees with my account of the Slovene neo-circumflex. He rejects compensatory lengthening as an explanation of the neo-circumflex, primarily on theoretical grounds. His "moraic analysis" is quite unacceptable to me because it starts from an a priori segmentation of the sp...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Croatian |
Published: |
Institut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje
2012-01-01
|
Series: | Rasprave: Časopis Instituta za Hrvatski Jezik i Jezikoslovlje |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/142485 |
id |
doaj-9aa4194b5aa44c7bae1f39882dcf567c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9aa4194b5aa44c7bae1f39882dcf567c2020-11-25T00:52:59ZhrvInstitut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovljeRasprave: Časopis Instituta za Hrvatski Jezik i Jezikoslovlje1331-67451849-03792012-01-01381117122The Slovene neo-circumflex revisitedFrederik Kortlandt0Department of comparative linguistics Leiden UniversityKeith Langston disagrees with my account of the Slovene neo-circumflex. He rejects compensatory lengthening as an explanation of the neo-circumflex, primarily on theoretical grounds. His "moraic analysis" is quite unacceptable to me because it starts from an a priori segmentation of the speech flow. In a strict autosegmental approach, the segmentation of the speech flow should be part of the analysis and not be given a priori. Langston's rejection of van Wijk's law, according to which the simplification of certain consonant clusters yielded lengthening of the following vowel, is based on a misguided theoretical interpretation which led him astray.http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/142485accentuationSlovene neo-cirkumflexacutecompensatory lengtheningvan Wijk's lawDybo's law |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Croatian |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Frederik Kortlandt |
spellingShingle |
Frederik Kortlandt The Slovene neo-circumflex revisited Rasprave: Časopis Instituta za Hrvatski Jezik i Jezikoslovlje accentuation Slovene neo-cirkumflex acute compensatory lengthening van Wijk's law Dybo's law |
author_facet |
Frederik Kortlandt |
author_sort |
Frederik Kortlandt |
title |
The Slovene neo-circumflex revisited |
title_short |
The Slovene neo-circumflex revisited |
title_full |
The Slovene neo-circumflex revisited |
title_fullStr |
The Slovene neo-circumflex revisited |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Slovene neo-circumflex revisited |
title_sort |
slovene neo-circumflex revisited |
publisher |
Institut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje |
series |
Rasprave: Časopis Instituta za Hrvatski Jezik i Jezikoslovlje |
issn |
1331-6745 1849-0379 |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
Keith Langston disagrees with my account of the Slovene neo-circumflex. He rejects compensatory lengthening as an explanation of the neo-circumflex, primarily on theoretical grounds. His "moraic analysis" is quite unacceptable to me because it starts from an a priori segmentation of the speech flow. In a strict autosegmental approach, the segmentation of the speech flow should be part of the analysis and not be given a priori. Langston's rejection of van Wijk's law, according to which the simplification of certain consonant clusters yielded lengthening of the following vowel, is based on a misguided theoretical interpretation which led him astray. |
topic |
accentuation Slovene neo-cirkumflex acute compensatory lengthening van Wijk's law Dybo's law |
url |
http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/142485 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT frederikkortlandt thesloveneneocircumflexrevisited AT frederikkortlandt sloveneneocircumflexrevisited |
_version_ |
1725239815427850240 |