Quelle implication des destinataires de la norme ? La voie de la corégulation

Coregulation is hardly promoted by the European Community as a “good governance” tool. This analysis highlights how far the reality suits the discourse when coregulation is at stake.When coregulation is used as a substitute to classical regulation that the public authority does not want or can not a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Apolline Roger
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Éditions en environnement VertigO 2009-11-01
Series:VertigO
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/8956
id doaj-9aa3c23da91742639ddaeb5031aad2c4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9aa3c23da91742639ddaeb5031aad2c42021-09-02T15:27:40ZfraÉditions en environnement VertigOVertigO1492-84422009-11-01610.4000/vertigo.8956Quelle implication des destinataires de la norme ? La voie de la corégulationApolline RogerCoregulation is hardly promoted by the European Community as a “good governance” tool. This analysis highlights how far the reality suits the discourse when coregulation is at stake.When coregulation is used as a substitute to classical regulation that the public authority does not want or can not adopt, it is likely that reality will be far from the theory. This coregulation raises legitimacy issues, and its environmental efficiency is doubtful. On the other hand, when used as a part of a policy mix including classical regulation, coregulation appears as an interesting method to increase participation and flexibility.http://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/8956coregulationenvironmental agreementsEuropean Communitygovernance hybrid.self-regulationvoluntary agreements
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Apolline Roger
spellingShingle Apolline Roger
Quelle implication des destinataires de la norme ? La voie de la corégulation
VertigO
coregulation
environmental agreements
European Community
governance hybrid.
self-regulation
voluntary agreements
author_facet Apolline Roger
author_sort Apolline Roger
title Quelle implication des destinataires de la norme ? La voie de la corégulation
title_short Quelle implication des destinataires de la norme ? La voie de la corégulation
title_full Quelle implication des destinataires de la norme ? La voie de la corégulation
title_fullStr Quelle implication des destinataires de la norme ? La voie de la corégulation
title_full_unstemmed Quelle implication des destinataires de la norme ? La voie de la corégulation
title_sort quelle implication des destinataires de la norme ? la voie de la corégulation
publisher Éditions en environnement VertigO
series VertigO
issn 1492-8442
publishDate 2009-11-01
description Coregulation is hardly promoted by the European Community as a “good governance” tool. This analysis highlights how far the reality suits the discourse when coregulation is at stake.When coregulation is used as a substitute to classical regulation that the public authority does not want or can not adopt, it is likely that reality will be far from the theory. This coregulation raises legitimacy issues, and its environmental efficiency is doubtful. On the other hand, when used as a part of a policy mix including classical regulation, coregulation appears as an interesting method to increase participation and flexibility.
topic coregulation
environmental agreements
European Community
governance hybrid.
self-regulation
voluntary agreements
url http://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/8956
work_keys_str_mv AT apollineroger quelleimplicationdesdestinatairesdelanormelavoiedelacoregulation
_version_ 1721173621970305024