The effect on turnout of campaign mobilization messages addressing ballot secrecy concerns: A replication experiment.

Given the persistence of public doubts about the integrity of ballot secrecy, which depress turnout, two prior experiments have shown precise evidence that both official governmental and unofficial mobilization campaigns providing assurances about ballot secrecy increase turnout among recently regis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alan S Gerber, Gregory A Huber, Albert H Fang, Catlan E Reardon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5549925?pdf=render
id doaj-9a996272c0974fcb93f53e808d49fdba
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9a996272c0974fcb93f53e808d49fdba2020-11-24T20:41:27ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01128e018219910.1371/journal.pone.0182199The effect on turnout of campaign mobilization messages addressing ballot secrecy concerns: A replication experiment.Alan S GerberGregory A HuberAlbert H FangCatlan E ReardonGiven the persistence of public doubts about the integrity of ballot secrecy, which depress turnout, two prior experiments have shown precise evidence that both official governmental and unofficial mobilization campaigns providing assurances about ballot secrecy increase turnout among recently registered nonvoters. To assess whether these findings replicate in other political settings, we describe a replication experiment where a non-governmental, non-partisan mobilization campaign sent similar treatment mailings containing assurances about ballot secrecy protections to recently registered nonvoters during the 2014 general election in Mississippi. We find that sending this mailer has no effect on turnout rates in this setting, which is characterized by an unusually low baseline turnout rate. These results are consistent with past research concluding that nonpartisan Get Out The Vote (GOTV) mail has very weak effects among very low turnout propensity registrants, and suggest that there are heterogeneous effects of ballot secrecy treatments associated with subjects' characteristics and the electoral context.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5549925?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alan S Gerber
Gregory A Huber
Albert H Fang
Catlan E Reardon
spellingShingle Alan S Gerber
Gregory A Huber
Albert H Fang
Catlan E Reardon
The effect on turnout of campaign mobilization messages addressing ballot secrecy concerns: A replication experiment.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Alan S Gerber
Gregory A Huber
Albert H Fang
Catlan E Reardon
author_sort Alan S Gerber
title The effect on turnout of campaign mobilization messages addressing ballot secrecy concerns: A replication experiment.
title_short The effect on turnout of campaign mobilization messages addressing ballot secrecy concerns: A replication experiment.
title_full The effect on turnout of campaign mobilization messages addressing ballot secrecy concerns: A replication experiment.
title_fullStr The effect on turnout of campaign mobilization messages addressing ballot secrecy concerns: A replication experiment.
title_full_unstemmed The effect on turnout of campaign mobilization messages addressing ballot secrecy concerns: A replication experiment.
title_sort effect on turnout of campaign mobilization messages addressing ballot secrecy concerns: a replication experiment.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Given the persistence of public doubts about the integrity of ballot secrecy, which depress turnout, two prior experiments have shown precise evidence that both official governmental and unofficial mobilization campaigns providing assurances about ballot secrecy increase turnout among recently registered nonvoters. To assess whether these findings replicate in other political settings, we describe a replication experiment where a non-governmental, non-partisan mobilization campaign sent similar treatment mailings containing assurances about ballot secrecy protections to recently registered nonvoters during the 2014 general election in Mississippi. We find that sending this mailer has no effect on turnout rates in this setting, which is characterized by an unusually low baseline turnout rate. These results are consistent with past research concluding that nonpartisan Get Out The Vote (GOTV) mail has very weak effects among very low turnout propensity registrants, and suggest that there are heterogeneous effects of ballot secrecy treatments associated with subjects' characteristics and the electoral context.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5549925?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT alansgerber theeffectonturnoutofcampaignmobilizationmessagesaddressingballotsecrecyconcernsareplicationexperiment
AT gregoryahuber theeffectonturnoutofcampaignmobilizationmessagesaddressingballotsecrecyconcernsareplicationexperiment
AT alberthfang theeffectonturnoutofcampaignmobilizationmessagesaddressingballotsecrecyconcernsareplicationexperiment
AT catlanereardon theeffectonturnoutofcampaignmobilizationmessagesaddressingballotsecrecyconcernsareplicationexperiment
AT alansgerber effectonturnoutofcampaignmobilizationmessagesaddressingballotsecrecyconcernsareplicationexperiment
AT gregoryahuber effectonturnoutofcampaignmobilizationmessagesaddressingballotsecrecyconcernsareplicationexperiment
AT alberthfang effectonturnoutofcampaignmobilizationmessagesaddressingballotsecrecyconcernsareplicationexperiment
AT catlanereardon effectonturnoutofcampaignmobilizationmessagesaddressingballotsecrecyconcernsareplicationexperiment
_version_ 1716825001565356032