Measurement of Harm Outcomes in Older Adults after Hospital Discharge: Reliability and Validity

Objectives. Defining and validating a measure of safety contributes to further validation of clinical measures. The objective was to define and examine the psychometric properties of the outcome “incidents of harm.” Methods. The Incident of Harm Caregiver Questionnaire was administered to caregivers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alison Douglas, Lori Letts, Kevin Eva, Julie Richardson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:Journal of Aging Research
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/150473
id doaj-9a91bf76e5d943bd958d8f2077aae570
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9a91bf76e5d943bd958d8f2077aae5702020-11-24T22:58:55ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Aging Research2090-22042090-22122012-01-01201210.1155/2012/150473150473Measurement of Harm Outcomes in Older Adults after Hospital Discharge: Reliability and ValidityAlison Douglas0Lori Letts1Kevin Eva2Julie Richardson3School of Rehabilitation Science, IAHS Building, Rm 402, McMaster University, 1400 Main St. W. Hamilton, ON, L8S 1C7, CanadaDepartment of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, CanadaCentre for Health Education Scholarship, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, CanadaDepartment of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, CanadaObjectives. Defining and validating a measure of safety contributes to further validation of clinical measures. The objective was to define and examine the psychometric properties of the outcome “incidents of harm.” Methods. The Incident of Harm Caregiver Questionnaire was administered to caregivers of older adults discharged from hospital by telephone. Caregivers completed daily logs for one month and medical charts were examined. Results. Test-retest reliability (n=38) was high for the occurrence of an incident of harm (yes/no; kappa = 1.0) and the type of incident (agreement = 100%). Validation against daily logs found no disagreement regarding occurrence or types of incidents. Validation with medical charts found no disagreement regarding incident occurrence and disagreement in half regarding incident type. Discussion. The data support the Incident of Harm Caregiver Questionnaire as a reliable and valid estimation of incidents for this sample and are important to researchers as a method to measure safety when validating clinical measures.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/150473
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alison Douglas
Lori Letts
Kevin Eva
Julie Richardson
spellingShingle Alison Douglas
Lori Letts
Kevin Eva
Julie Richardson
Measurement of Harm Outcomes in Older Adults after Hospital Discharge: Reliability and Validity
Journal of Aging Research
author_facet Alison Douglas
Lori Letts
Kevin Eva
Julie Richardson
author_sort Alison Douglas
title Measurement of Harm Outcomes in Older Adults after Hospital Discharge: Reliability and Validity
title_short Measurement of Harm Outcomes in Older Adults after Hospital Discharge: Reliability and Validity
title_full Measurement of Harm Outcomes in Older Adults after Hospital Discharge: Reliability and Validity
title_fullStr Measurement of Harm Outcomes in Older Adults after Hospital Discharge: Reliability and Validity
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of Harm Outcomes in Older Adults after Hospital Discharge: Reliability and Validity
title_sort measurement of harm outcomes in older adults after hospital discharge: reliability and validity
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Aging Research
issn 2090-2204
2090-2212
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Objectives. Defining and validating a measure of safety contributes to further validation of clinical measures. The objective was to define and examine the psychometric properties of the outcome “incidents of harm.” Methods. The Incident of Harm Caregiver Questionnaire was administered to caregivers of older adults discharged from hospital by telephone. Caregivers completed daily logs for one month and medical charts were examined. Results. Test-retest reliability (n=38) was high for the occurrence of an incident of harm (yes/no; kappa = 1.0) and the type of incident (agreement = 100%). Validation against daily logs found no disagreement regarding occurrence or types of incidents. Validation with medical charts found no disagreement regarding incident occurrence and disagreement in half regarding incident type. Discussion. The data support the Incident of Harm Caregiver Questionnaire as a reliable and valid estimation of incidents for this sample and are important to researchers as a method to measure safety when validating clinical measures.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/150473
work_keys_str_mv AT alisondouglas measurementofharmoutcomesinolderadultsafterhospitaldischargereliabilityandvalidity
AT loriletts measurementofharmoutcomesinolderadultsafterhospitaldischargereliabilityandvalidity
AT kevineva measurementofharmoutcomesinolderadultsafterhospitaldischargereliabilityandvalidity
AT julierichardson measurementofharmoutcomesinolderadultsafterhospitaldischargereliabilityandvalidity
_version_ 1725646163755925504