Quality of Blood Pressure Tracking Apps for the iPhone: Content Analysis and Evaluation of Adherence With Home Blood Pressure Measurement Best Practices

BackgroundBlood pressure (BP) tracking apps may aid in hypertension (HTN) self-management, but app quality may be problematic. ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop a content-dependent rating system for BP tracking apps and systematically evaluate BP tracking featu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leong, Amanda Y, Makowsky, Mark J
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2019-04-01
Series:JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Online Access:https://mhealth.jmir.org/2019/4/e10809/
id doaj-9a8b8d7521a9434c892b90c63833d163
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9a8b8d7521a9434c892b90c63833d1632021-05-02T19:28:30ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR mHealth and uHealth2291-52222019-04-0174e1080910.2196/10809Quality of Blood Pressure Tracking Apps for the iPhone: Content Analysis and Evaluation of Adherence With Home Blood Pressure Measurement Best PracticesLeong, Amanda YMakowsky, Mark J BackgroundBlood pressure (BP) tracking apps may aid in hypertension (HTN) self-management, but app quality may be problematic. ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop a content-dependent rating system for BP tracking apps and systematically evaluate BP tracking features, content-independent quality, functional characteristics, and educational comprehensiveness of English language iPhone apps developed with the primary purpose of tracking a consumer’s BP measurements. MethodsWe created a 28-item checklist reflecting overall app quality and a simplified 2-item checklist to assess adherence with home BP monitoring best practices. Apps with educational information were evaluated for comprehensiveness on a 7-point scale and for consistency with evidence-based guidelines. Higher scores represent better quality and comprehensiveness. We searched the Canadian App Store on June 28, 2016, using the keywords hypertension and blood pressure. A total of 2 reviewers independently assessed apps according to the standardized template. We determined if paid apps, educational apps, or those rated ≥4 stars were of higher quality. ResultsOf the 948 apps screened, 62 met the inclusion criteria. The mean overall quality score was 12.2 (SD 4.6, out of 28) and 6 apps (10%, 6/62) met the home BP monitoring best practice criteria. In all, 12 apps contained educational content (mean comprehensiveness 2.4, SD 1.6 out of 14), most commonly, background information on HTN. Apps with educational content (mean 15.1, SD 3.8 vs 11.8, SD 4.8; P=.03) or a ≥4 star rating (median 19, interquartile range [IQR] 15-20, vs 12, IQR 9-15; P=.02) had higher overall quality. ConclusionsThe BP tracking apps reviewed had variable quality and few met the home BP monitoring best practice criteria. When deciding to recommend a specific BP tracking app, we suggest clinicians should evaluate whether the app allows input of duplicate BP readings in the morning and evening for at least seven days and presents the mean BP value for user-specified dates. Greater attention to home BP measurement best practices is required during app development.https://mhealth.jmir.org/2019/4/e10809/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leong, Amanda Y
Makowsky, Mark J
spellingShingle Leong, Amanda Y
Makowsky, Mark J
Quality of Blood Pressure Tracking Apps for the iPhone: Content Analysis and Evaluation of Adherence With Home Blood Pressure Measurement Best Practices
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
author_facet Leong, Amanda Y
Makowsky, Mark J
author_sort Leong, Amanda Y
title Quality of Blood Pressure Tracking Apps for the iPhone: Content Analysis and Evaluation of Adherence With Home Blood Pressure Measurement Best Practices
title_short Quality of Blood Pressure Tracking Apps for the iPhone: Content Analysis and Evaluation of Adherence With Home Blood Pressure Measurement Best Practices
title_full Quality of Blood Pressure Tracking Apps for the iPhone: Content Analysis and Evaluation of Adherence With Home Blood Pressure Measurement Best Practices
title_fullStr Quality of Blood Pressure Tracking Apps for the iPhone: Content Analysis and Evaluation of Adherence With Home Blood Pressure Measurement Best Practices
title_full_unstemmed Quality of Blood Pressure Tracking Apps for the iPhone: Content Analysis and Evaluation of Adherence With Home Blood Pressure Measurement Best Practices
title_sort quality of blood pressure tracking apps for the iphone: content analysis and evaluation of adherence with home blood pressure measurement best practices
publisher JMIR Publications
series JMIR mHealth and uHealth
issn 2291-5222
publishDate 2019-04-01
description BackgroundBlood pressure (BP) tracking apps may aid in hypertension (HTN) self-management, but app quality may be problematic. ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop a content-dependent rating system for BP tracking apps and systematically evaluate BP tracking features, content-independent quality, functional characteristics, and educational comprehensiveness of English language iPhone apps developed with the primary purpose of tracking a consumer’s BP measurements. MethodsWe created a 28-item checklist reflecting overall app quality and a simplified 2-item checklist to assess adherence with home BP monitoring best practices. Apps with educational information were evaluated for comprehensiveness on a 7-point scale and for consistency with evidence-based guidelines. Higher scores represent better quality and comprehensiveness. We searched the Canadian App Store on June 28, 2016, using the keywords hypertension and blood pressure. A total of 2 reviewers independently assessed apps according to the standardized template. We determined if paid apps, educational apps, or those rated ≥4 stars were of higher quality. ResultsOf the 948 apps screened, 62 met the inclusion criteria. The mean overall quality score was 12.2 (SD 4.6, out of 28) and 6 apps (10%, 6/62) met the home BP monitoring best practice criteria. In all, 12 apps contained educational content (mean comprehensiveness 2.4, SD 1.6 out of 14), most commonly, background information on HTN. Apps with educational content (mean 15.1, SD 3.8 vs 11.8, SD 4.8; P=.03) or a ≥4 star rating (median 19, interquartile range [IQR] 15-20, vs 12, IQR 9-15; P=.02) had higher overall quality. ConclusionsThe BP tracking apps reviewed had variable quality and few met the home BP monitoring best practice criteria. When deciding to recommend a specific BP tracking app, we suggest clinicians should evaluate whether the app allows input of duplicate BP readings in the morning and evening for at least seven days and presents the mean BP value for user-specified dates. Greater attention to home BP measurement best practices is required during app development.
url https://mhealth.jmir.org/2019/4/e10809/
work_keys_str_mv AT leongamanday qualityofbloodpressuretrackingappsfortheiphonecontentanalysisandevaluationofadherencewithhomebloodpressuremeasurementbestpractices
AT makowskymarkj qualityofbloodpressuretrackingappsfortheiphonecontentanalysisandevaluationofadherencewithhomebloodpressuremeasurementbestpractices
_version_ 1721488223670108160