Authentic Religious Education: A Question of Language?

There is much emphasis today on inclusion and diversity in educational systems. As the place of religious belief remains a significant factor in such debates, there is a need for shared understanding of the language and purpose of Religious Education in schools. Given the substantial international f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Leonardo Franchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-12-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/9/12/403
id doaj-9a86d472c35b4a0389c8d6b6576feceb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9a86d472c35b4a0389c8d6b6576feceb2020-11-24T23:31:41ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442018-12-0191240310.3390/rel9120403rel9120403Authentic Religious Education: A Question of Language?Leonardo Franchi0School of Education, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G83 0AT, UKThere is much emphasis today on inclusion and diversity in educational systems. As the place of religious belief remains a significant factor in such debates, there is a need for shared understanding of the language and purpose of Religious Education in schools. Given the substantial international footprint of Catholic schools, the conceptual framework of Religious Education in Catholic schools merits serious scrutiny. The Catholic Church’s written teaching on education has a strong focus on the contemporary school as a site of intercultural dialogue. The related teaching on Religious Education in schools, however, remains underdeveloped, with strong voices debating the desirability, or otherwise, of a strong focus on ‘faith formation and practice’ as an outcome of Religious Education. Problematically, terms like ‘Religious Education’ have inconsistent translations in the official documents of the Catholic Church, leading to a plurality of understandings internationally of the ultimate aim of the subject. A presentation of the linguistic inconsistency between English and Italian translations of documents of the Holy See reveals the scale of the challenge. This unsatisfactory arrangement needs reform. Rooted in a close critical study of Catholic teaching on education, the article presents two arguments designed to initiate the reform process: (a) the Catholic Church’s settled teaching on Religious Education must develop greater internal cohesion before it can make a meaningful contribution to intercultural dialogue, and (b) an International Directory of Religious Education, written collegially by qualified lay people and clergy, will build stronger foundations for shared understanding of the aims and scope of Religious Education among key stakeholders in Catholic schools. This shift in direction will harmonise Religious Education expectations in Catholic schools, and offer firmer ground for dialogue with those who manage and teach Religious Education in so-called ‘non-denominational’ schools.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/9/12/403religious educationintercultural dialoguecatechesisinclusion
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leonardo Franchi
spellingShingle Leonardo Franchi
Authentic Religious Education: A Question of Language?
Religions
religious education
intercultural dialogue
catechesis
inclusion
author_facet Leonardo Franchi
author_sort Leonardo Franchi
title Authentic Religious Education: A Question of Language?
title_short Authentic Religious Education: A Question of Language?
title_full Authentic Religious Education: A Question of Language?
title_fullStr Authentic Religious Education: A Question of Language?
title_full_unstemmed Authentic Religious Education: A Question of Language?
title_sort authentic religious education: a question of language?
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2018-12-01
description There is much emphasis today on inclusion and diversity in educational systems. As the place of religious belief remains a significant factor in such debates, there is a need for shared understanding of the language and purpose of Religious Education in schools. Given the substantial international footprint of Catholic schools, the conceptual framework of Religious Education in Catholic schools merits serious scrutiny. The Catholic Church’s written teaching on education has a strong focus on the contemporary school as a site of intercultural dialogue. The related teaching on Religious Education in schools, however, remains underdeveloped, with strong voices debating the desirability, or otherwise, of a strong focus on ‘faith formation and practice’ as an outcome of Religious Education. Problematically, terms like ‘Religious Education’ have inconsistent translations in the official documents of the Catholic Church, leading to a plurality of understandings internationally of the ultimate aim of the subject. A presentation of the linguistic inconsistency between English and Italian translations of documents of the Holy See reveals the scale of the challenge. This unsatisfactory arrangement needs reform. Rooted in a close critical study of Catholic teaching on education, the article presents two arguments designed to initiate the reform process: (a) the Catholic Church’s settled teaching on Religious Education must develop greater internal cohesion before it can make a meaningful contribution to intercultural dialogue, and (b) an International Directory of Religious Education, written collegially by qualified lay people and clergy, will build stronger foundations for shared understanding of the aims and scope of Religious Education among key stakeholders in Catholic schools. This shift in direction will harmonise Religious Education expectations in Catholic schools, and offer firmer ground for dialogue with those who manage and teach Religious Education in so-called ‘non-denominational’ schools.
topic religious education
intercultural dialogue
catechesis
inclusion
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/9/12/403
work_keys_str_mv AT leonardofranchi authenticreligiouseducationaquestionoflanguage
_version_ 1725536523812601856