The Legitimacy Of European Networks: Perspectives From Belgian Civil Society Organisations

This article identifies how Belgian civil society organisations (CSOs) legitimise their European networks (ENs). European networks are understood as European umbrella associations gathering together national CSOs and representing them at the EU level. This article unpacks the concept of organisatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Samuel Defacqz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UACES 2018-06-01
Series:Journal of Contemporary European Research
Subjects:
CSO
Online Access:http://www.jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/874
id doaj-9a5d3e18919246e7b66f3b32e0c029f4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9a5d3e18919246e7b66f3b32e0c029f42020-11-25T04:07:37ZengUACESJournal of Contemporary European Research1815-347X2018-06-0114210.30950/jcer.v14i2.874874The Legitimacy Of European Networks: Perspectives From Belgian Civil Society OrganisationsSamuel Defacqz0F.R.S.–FNRS, Université catholique de Louvain (UCL) This article identifies how Belgian civil society organisations (CSOs) legitimise their European networks (ENs). European networks are understood as European umbrella associations gathering together national CSOs and representing them at the EU level. This article unpacks the concept of organisational legitimacy by empirically analysing Belgian CSOs’ discourse about their ENs. EU institutions consider ENs as appropriate organisations to link the European policymaking process to the requests and opinions expressed by national CSOs and their constituents. Existing studies draw negative conclusions about the transmitter role of ENs and highlight the malfunction of the accountability channel and an unfair representative balance among members. This empirical analysis qualifies these two arguments. The results show that Belgian CSOs legitimise their ENs in two ways: the function they hold in Brussels and their efficiency. ENs are thus not legitimised as accurate transmitters between national CSOs and European officials but as efficient champions of general political objectives, to which Belgian CSOs broadly adhere. These results are based on an inductive qualitative analysis of interviews with staff from five Belgian environmental CSOs. http://www.jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/874LegitimacyEuropean NetworksEuropean networksCSOEnvironmental CSOCivil Society
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Samuel Defacqz
spellingShingle Samuel Defacqz
The Legitimacy Of European Networks: Perspectives From Belgian Civil Society Organisations
Journal of Contemporary European Research
Legitimacy
European Networks
European networks
CSO
Environmental CSO
Civil Society
author_facet Samuel Defacqz
author_sort Samuel Defacqz
title The Legitimacy Of European Networks: Perspectives From Belgian Civil Society Organisations
title_short The Legitimacy Of European Networks: Perspectives From Belgian Civil Society Organisations
title_full The Legitimacy Of European Networks: Perspectives From Belgian Civil Society Organisations
title_fullStr The Legitimacy Of European Networks: Perspectives From Belgian Civil Society Organisations
title_full_unstemmed The Legitimacy Of European Networks: Perspectives From Belgian Civil Society Organisations
title_sort legitimacy of european networks: perspectives from belgian civil society organisations
publisher UACES
series Journal of Contemporary European Research
issn 1815-347X
publishDate 2018-06-01
description This article identifies how Belgian civil society organisations (CSOs) legitimise their European networks (ENs). European networks are understood as European umbrella associations gathering together national CSOs and representing them at the EU level. This article unpacks the concept of organisational legitimacy by empirically analysing Belgian CSOs’ discourse about their ENs. EU institutions consider ENs as appropriate organisations to link the European policymaking process to the requests and opinions expressed by national CSOs and their constituents. Existing studies draw negative conclusions about the transmitter role of ENs and highlight the malfunction of the accountability channel and an unfair representative balance among members. This empirical analysis qualifies these two arguments. The results show that Belgian CSOs legitimise their ENs in two ways: the function they hold in Brussels and their efficiency. ENs are thus not legitimised as accurate transmitters between national CSOs and European officials but as efficient champions of general political objectives, to which Belgian CSOs broadly adhere. These results are based on an inductive qualitative analysis of interviews with staff from five Belgian environmental CSOs.
topic Legitimacy
European Networks
European networks
CSO
Environmental CSO
Civil Society
url http://www.jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/874
work_keys_str_mv AT samueldefacqz thelegitimacyofeuropeannetworksperspectivesfrombelgiancivilsocietyorganisations
AT samueldefacqz legitimacyofeuropeannetworksperspectivesfrombelgiancivilsocietyorganisations
_version_ 1724428118996811776