Bicykl Jejího Veličenstva: O národním habitu a sociologické komparaci

Why are things different on the other side of national borders; and how can this be explained sociologically? This inaugural lecture tries to answer these questions, starting from the example of the bicycle in the Netherlands. It distinguishes four processes that have contributed to increasing simil...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Giselinde Kuipers
Format: Article
Language:ces
Published: Karolinum Press 2014-06-01
Series:Historicka Sociologie
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/23363525.2014.11
id doaj-9a5c526cacf742b8aaabcebf81c37938
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9a5c526cacf742b8aaabcebf81c379382020-11-25T02:48:51ZcesKarolinum PressHistoricka Sociologie1804-06162336-35252014-06-0120141254510.14712/23363525.2014.111063Bicykl Jejího Veličenstva: O národním habitu a sociologické komparaciGiselinde KuipersWhy are things different on the other side of national borders; and how can this be explained sociologically? This inaugural lecture tries to answer these questions, starting from the example of the bicycle in the Netherlands. It distinguishes four processes that have contributed to increasing similarity within nations: growing interdependence within nations; increasing density of networks and institutions; vertical diffusion of styles and standards; and the development of national we-feelings. Together, these processes have contributed to the development of national habitus: increasing similarities within nations, and increasing differences between people living in different countries. These processes have reached their apex in the second half of the twentieth century. Since then, they have diminished, leading to increasing variations within countries, and growing similarities between comparable groups in different countries. This analysis poses new questions and challenges for sociologists. First, it leads us to rethink comparative research: what are we comparing when we compare nations, and is this still a viable unit of analysis? Second, it leads us to consider how the transfer of styles and standards occurs in our informalized, globalized, and mediatized age. Third, sociologists should analyse the new forms of inequality resulting from these processes, such as the growing rift between ‘ locals ’ and (bike-loving) cosmopolitans.http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/23363525.2014.11bicyclenational habitusthe Netherlandsnew forms of inequalitycomparative researchprocess sociology
collection DOAJ
language ces
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Giselinde Kuipers
spellingShingle Giselinde Kuipers
Bicykl Jejího Veličenstva: O národním habitu a sociologické komparaci
Historicka Sociologie
bicycle
national habitus
the Netherlands
new forms of inequality
comparative research
process sociology
author_facet Giselinde Kuipers
author_sort Giselinde Kuipers
title Bicykl Jejího Veličenstva: O národním habitu a sociologické komparaci
title_short Bicykl Jejího Veličenstva: O národním habitu a sociologické komparaci
title_full Bicykl Jejího Veličenstva: O národním habitu a sociologické komparaci
title_fullStr Bicykl Jejího Veličenstva: O národním habitu a sociologické komparaci
title_full_unstemmed Bicykl Jejího Veličenstva: O národním habitu a sociologické komparaci
title_sort bicykl jejího veličenstva: o národním habitu a sociologické komparaci
publisher Karolinum Press
series Historicka Sociologie
issn 1804-0616
2336-3525
publishDate 2014-06-01
description Why are things different on the other side of national borders; and how can this be explained sociologically? This inaugural lecture tries to answer these questions, starting from the example of the bicycle in the Netherlands. It distinguishes four processes that have contributed to increasing similarity within nations: growing interdependence within nations; increasing density of networks and institutions; vertical diffusion of styles and standards; and the development of national we-feelings. Together, these processes have contributed to the development of national habitus: increasing similarities within nations, and increasing differences between people living in different countries. These processes have reached their apex in the second half of the twentieth century. Since then, they have diminished, leading to increasing variations within countries, and growing similarities between comparable groups in different countries. This analysis poses new questions and challenges for sociologists. First, it leads us to rethink comparative research: what are we comparing when we compare nations, and is this still a viable unit of analysis? Second, it leads us to consider how the transfer of styles and standards occurs in our informalized, globalized, and mediatized age. Third, sociologists should analyse the new forms of inequality resulting from these processes, such as the growing rift between ‘ locals ’ and (bike-loving) cosmopolitans.
topic bicycle
national habitus
the Netherlands
new forms of inequality
comparative research
process sociology
url http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/23363525.2014.11
work_keys_str_mv AT giselindekuipers bicykljejihovelicenstvaonarodnimhabituasociologickekomparaci
_version_ 1724746235204599808