The Economic Development Strategy Preferences of Community Leaders in Texas

The suburb/central city dichotomy has been a conceptual tool used by scholars to differentiate communities in a number of ways, including politics, policy preference, and political ideology. Given the various changes undergone by suburbs and central cities during the past few decades, a renewed inve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James Vanderleeuw, Thomas Sowers, Terri Davis, Jason Sides, Michael Pennington
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2012-12-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012468283
id doaj-9a56aa4aa9604e22a16f42382480e5fe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9a56aa4aa9604e22a16f42382480e5fe2020-11-25T03:01:43ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402012-12-01210.1177/215824401246828310.1177_2158244012468283The Economic Development Strategy Preferences of Community Leaders in TexasJames Vanderleeuw0Thomas Sowers1Terri Davis2Jason Sides3Michael Pennington4 Lamar University, Beaumont, TX, USA Lamar University, Beaumont, TX, USA Lamar University, Beaumont, TX, USA Lamar University, Beaumont, TX, USA University of North Carolina–Pembroke, USAThe suburb/central city dichotomy has been a conceptual tool used by scholars to differentiate communities in a number of ways, including politics, policy preference, and political ideology. Given the various changes undergone by suburbs and central cities during the past few decades, a renewed investigation into how well this classification actually accounts for differences in the policy preferences of city leaders is beneficial to an overall understanding of urban politics and policy. Using census data and survey results of several types of city leaders in Texas, we examine the ways in which the suburb/central city dichotomy influences the policy preferences of city leaders. Our findings indicate the dichotomy remains a useful conceptual tool for understanding urban policy making particularly with respect to influencing and promoting particular attitudes among city leaders in the important area of economic development.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012468283
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James Vanderleeuw
Thomas Sowers
Terri Davis
Jason Sides
Michael Pennington
spellingShingle James Vanderleeuw
Thomas Sowers
Terri Davis
Jason Sides
Michael Pennington
The Economic Development Strategy Preferences of Community Leaders in Texas
SAGE Open
author_facet James Vanderleeuw
Thomas Sowers
Terri Davis
Jason Sides
Michael Pennington
author_sort James Vanderleeuw
title The Economic Development Strategy Preferences of Community Leaders in Texas
title_short The Economic Development Strategy Preferences of Community Leaders in Texas
title_full The Economic Development Strategy Preferences of Community Leaders in Texas
title_fullStr The Economic Development Strategy Preferences of Community Leaders in Texas
title_full_unstemmed The Economic Development Strategy Preferences of Community Leaders in Texas
title_sort economic development strategy preferences of community leaders in texas
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2012-12-01
description The suburb/central city dichotomy has been a conceptual tool used by scholars to differentiate communities in a number of ways, including politics, policy preference, and political ideology. Given the various changes undergone by suburbs and central cities during the past few decades, a renewed investigation into how well this classification actually accounts for differences in the policy preferences of city leaders is beneficial to an overall understanding of urban politics and policy. Using census data and survey results of several types of city leaders in Texas, we examine the ways in which the suburb/central city dichotomy influences the policy preferences of city leaders. Our findings indicate the dichotomy remains a useful conceptual tool for understanding urban policy making particularly with respect to influencing and promoting particular attitudes among city leaders in the important area of economic development.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012468283
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesvanderleeuw theeconomicdevelopmentstrategypreferencesofcommunityleadersintexas
AT thomassowers theeconomicdevelopmentstrategypreferencesofcommunityleadersintexas
AT terridavis theeconomicdevelopmentstrategypreferencesofcommunityleadersintexas
AT jasonsides theeconomicdevelopmentstrategypreferencesofcommunityleadersintexas
AT michaelpennington theeconomicdevelopmentstrategypreferencesofcommunityleadersintexas
AT jamesvanderleeuw economicdevelopmentstrategypreferencesofcommunityleadersintexas
AT thomassowers economicdevelopmentstrategypreferencesofcommunityleadersintexas
AT terridavis economicdevelopmentstrategypreferencesofcommunityleadersintexas
AT jasonsides economicdevelopmentstrategypreferencesofcommunityleadersintexas
AT michaelpennington economicdevelopmentstrategypreferencesofcommunityleadersintexas
_version_ 1724692383790006272