An Evaluation of Antifungal Agents for the Treatment of Fungal Contamination in Indoor Air Environments

Fungal contamination in indoor environments has been associated with adverse health effects for the inhabitants. Remediation of fungal contamination requires removal of the fungi present and modifying the indoor environment to become less favourable to growth.  This may include treatment of indoor e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Senthaamarai Rogawansamy, Sharyn Gaskin, Michael Taylor, Dino Pisaniello
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-06-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/6/6319
id doaj-9a4dd308752b4f5c92c292e0ee333dd6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9a4dd308752b4f5c92c292e0ee333dd62020-11-24T23:49:55ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1660-46012015-06-011266319633210.3390/ijerph120606319ijerph120606319An Evaluation of Antifungal Agents for the Treatment of Fungal Contamination in Indoor Air EnvironmentsSenthaamarai Rogawansamy0Sharyn Gaskin1Michael Taylor2Dino Pisaniello3Occupational and Environmental Hygiene Laboratory, Discipline of Public Health, School of Population Health, University of Adelaide, South Australia 5005, AustraliaOccupational and Environmental Hygiene Laboratory, Discipline of Public Health, School of Population Health, University of Adelaide, South Australia 5005, AustraliaOccupational and Environmental Hygiene Laboratory, Discipline of Public Health, School of Population Health, University of Adelaide, South Australia 5005, AustraliaOccupational and Environmental Hygiene Laboratory, Discipline of Public Health, School of Population Health, University of Adelaide, South Australia 5005, AustraliaFungal contamination in indoor environments has been associated with adverse health effects for the inhabitants. Remediation of fungal contamination requires removal of the fungi present and modifying the indoor environment to become less favourable to growth.  This may include treatment of indoor environments with an antifungal agent to prevent future growth. However there are limited published data or advice on chemical agents suitable for indoor fungal remediation. The aim of this study was to assess the relative efficacies of five commercially available cleaning agents with published or anecdotal use for indoor fungal remediation. The five agents included two common multi-purpose industrial disinfectants (Cavicide® and Virkon®), 70% ethanol, vinegar (4.0%-4.2% acetic acid), and a plant-derived compound (tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) oil) tested in both a liquid and vapour form. Tea tree oil has recently generated interest for its antimicrobial efficacy in clinical settings, but has not been widely employed for fungal remediation. Each antifungal agent was assessed for fungal growth inhibition using a disc diffusion method against a representative species from two common fungal genera, (Aspergillus fumigatus and Penicillium chrysogenum), which were isolated from air samples and are commonly found in indoor air. Tea tree oil demonstrated the greatest inhibitory effect on the growth of both fungi, applied in either a liquid or vapour form. Cavicide® and Virkon® demonstrated similar, although less, growth inhibition of both genera. Vinegar (4.0%–4.2% acetic acid) was found to only inhibit the growth of P. chrysogenum, while 70% ethanol was found to have no inhibitory effect on the growth of either fungi. There was a notable inhibition in sporulation, distinct from growth inhibition after exposure to tea tree oil, Virkon®, Cavicide® and vinegar. Results demonstrate that common cleaning and antifungal agents differ in their capacity to inhibit the growth of fungal genera found in the indoor air environment. The results indicate that tea tree oil was the most effective antifungal agent tested, and may have industrial application for the remediation of fungal contamination in residential and occupational buildings.http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/6/6319Airborne fungiindoor air quality (IAQ)vinegartea tree oilinhibition zone
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Senthaamarai Rogawansamy
Sharyn Gaskin
Michael Taylor
Dino Pisaniello
spellingShingle Senthaamarai Rogawansamy
Sharyn Gaskin
Michael Taylor
Dino Pisaniello
An Evaluation of Antifungal Agents for the Treatment of Fungal Contamination in Indoor Air Environments
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Airborne fungi
indoor air quality (IAQ)
vinegar
tea tree oil
inhibition zone
author_facet Senthaamarai Rogawansamy
Sharyn Gaskin
Michael Taylor
Dino Pisaniello
author_sort Senthaamarai Rogawansamy
title An Evaluation of Antifungal Agents for the Treatment of Fungal Contamination in Indoor Air Environments
title_short An Evaluation of Antifungal Agents for the Treatment of Fungal Contamination in Indoor Air Environments
title_full An Evaluation of Antifungal Agents for the Treatment of Fungal Contamination in Indoor Air Environments
title_fullStr An Evaluation of Antifungal Agents for the Treatment of Fungal Contamination in Indoor Air Environments
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation of Antifungal Agents for the Treatment of Fungal Contamination in Indoor Air Environments
title_sort evaluation of antifungal agents for the treatment of fungal contamination in indoor air environments
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1660-4601
publishDate 2015-06-01
description Fungal contamination in indoor environments has been associated with adverse health effects for the inhabitants. Remediation of fungal contamination requires removal of the fungi present and modifying the indoor environment to become less favourable to growth.  This may include treatment of indoor environments with an antifungal agent to prevent future growth. However there are limited published data or advice on chemical agents suitable for indoor fungal remediation. The aim of this study was to assess the relative efficacies of five commercially available cleaning agents with published or anecdotal use for indoor fungal remediation. The five agents included two common multi-purpose industrial disinfectants (Cavicide® and Virkon®), 70% ethanol, vinegar (4.0%-4.2% acetic acid), and a plant-derived compound (tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) oil) tested in both a liquid and vapour form. Tea tree oil has recently generated interest for its antimicrobial efficacy in clinical settings, but has not been widely employed for fungal remediation. Each antifungal agent was assessed for fungal growth inhibition using a disc diffusion method against a representative species from two common fungal genera, (Aspergillus fumigatus and Penicillium chrysogenum), which were isolated from air samples and are commonly found in indoor air. Tea tree oil demonstrated the greatest inhibitory effect on the growth of both fungi, applied in either a liquid or vapour form. Cavicide® and Virkon® demonstrated similar, although less, growth inhibition of both genera. Vinegar (4.0%–4.2% acetic acid) was found to only inhibit the growth of P. chrysogenum, while 70% ethanol was found to have no inhibitory effect on the growth of either fungi. There was a notable inhibition in sporulation, distinct from growth inhibition after exposure to tea tree oil, Virkon®, Cavicide® and vinegar. Results demonstrate that common cleaning and antifungal agents differ in their capacity to inhibit the growth of fungal genera found in the indoor air environment. The results indicate that tea tree oil was the most effective antifungal agent tested, and may have industrial application for the remediation of fungal contamination in residential and occupational buildings.
topic Airborne fungi
indoor air quality (IAQ)
vinegar
tea tree oil
inhibition zone
url http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/6/6319
work_keys_str_mv AT senthaamarairogawansamy anevaluationofantifungalagentsforthetreatmentoffungalcontaminationinindoorairenvironments
AT sharyngaskin anevaluationofantifungalagentsforthetreatmentoffungalcontaminationinindoorairenvironments
AT michaeltaylor anevaluationofantifungalagentsforthetreatmentoffungalcontaminationinindoorairenvironments
AT dinopisaniello anevaluationofantifungalagentsforthetreatmentoffungalcontaminationinindoorairenvironments
AT senthaamarairogawansamy evaluationofantifungalagentsforthetreatmentoffungalcontaminationinindoorairenvironments
AT sharyngaskin evaluationofantifungalagentsforthetreatmentoffungalcontaminationinindoorairenvironments
AT michaeltaylor evaluationofantifungalagentsforthetreatmentoffungalcontaminationinindoorairenvironments
AT dinopisaniello evaluationofantifungalagentsforthetreatmentoffungalcontaminationinindoorairenvironments
_version_ 1725480803838722048