A Comparative Study of Two Real Root Isolation Methods

Recent progress in polynomial elimination has rendered the computation of the real roots of ill-conditioned polynomials of high degree (over 1000) with huge coefficients (several thousand digits) a critical operation in computer algebra. To rise to the occasion, the only method-candidate that ha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. G. Akritas, A. W. Strzebonski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius University Press 2005-10-01
Series:Nonlinear Analysis
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/nonlinear-analysis/article/view/15110
id doaj-9a367d750502458b8a0a1afd8c7307cb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9a367d750502458b8a0a1afd8c7307cb2020-11-25T02:39:58ZengVilnius University PressNonlinear Analysis1392-51132335-89632005-10-0110410.15388/NA.2005.10.4.15110A Comparative Study of Two Real Root Isolation MethodsA. G. Akritas0 A. W. Strzebonski1University of Thessaly, GreeceWolfram Research Inc., USA Recent progress in polynomial elimination has rendered the computation of the real roots of ill-conditioned polynomials of high degree (over 1000) with huge coefficients (several thousand digits) a critical operation in computer algebra. To rise to the occasion, the only method-candidate that has been considered by various authors for modification and improvement has been the Collins-Akritas bisection method [1], which is a based on a variation of Vincent’s theorem [2]. The most recent example is the paper by Rouillier and Zimmermann [3], where the authors present “... a new algorithm, which is optimal in terms of memory usage and as fast as both Collins and Akritas’ algorithm and Krandick variant ...” [3] In this paper we compare our own continued fractions method CF [4] (which is directly based on Vincent’s theorem) with the best bisection method REL described in [3]. Experimentation with the data presented in [3] showed that, with respect to time, our continued fractions method CF is by far superior to REL, whereas the two are about equal with respect to space. http://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/nonlinear-analysis/article/view/15110root isolationVincent’s theoremcontinued fractions methodbisection (or Collins-Akritas) method
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. G. Akritas
A. W. Strzebonski
spellingShingle A. G. Akritas
A. W. Strzebonski
A Comparative Study of Two Real Root Isolation Methods
Nonlinear Analysis
root isolation
Vincent’s theorem
continued fractions method
bisection (or Collins-Akritas) method
author_facet A. G. Akritas
A. W. Strzebonski
author_sort A. G. Akritas
title A Comparative Study of Two Real Root Isolation Methods
title_short A Comparative Study of Two Real Root Isolation Methods
title_full A Comparative Study of Two Real Root Isolation Methods
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Two Real Root Isolation Methods
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Two Real Root Isolation Methods
title_sort comparative study of two real root isolation methods
publisher Vilnius University Press
series Nonlinear Analysis
issn 1392-5113
2335-8963
publishDate 2005-10-01
description Recent progress in polynomial elimination has rendered the computation of the real roots of ill-conditioned polynomials of high degree (over 1000) with huge coefficients (several thousand digits) a critical operation in computer algebra. To rise to the occasion, the only method-candidate that has been considered by various authors for modification and improvement has been the Collins-Akritas bisection method [1], which is a based on a variation of Vincent’s theorem [2]. The most recent example is the paper by Rouillier and Zimmermann [3], where the authors present “... a new algorithm, which is optimal in terms of memory usage and as fast as both Collins and Akritas’ algorithm and Krandick variant ...” [3] In this paper we compare our own continued fractions method CF [4] (which is directly based on Vincent’s theorem) with the best bisection method REL described in [3]. Experimentation with the data presented in [3] showed that, with respect to time, our continued fractions method CF is by far superior to REL, whereas the two are about equal with respect to space.
topic root isolation
Vincent’s theorem
continued fractions method
bisection (or Collins-Akritas) method
url http://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/nonlinear-analysis/article/view/15110
work_keys_str_mv AT agakritas acomparativestudyoftworealrootisolationmethods
AT awstrzebonski acomparativestudyoftworealrootisolationmethods
AT agakritas comparativestudyoftworealrootisolationmethods
AT awstrzebonski comparativestudyoftworealrootisolationmethods
_version_ 1724783826456018944