Decoding phonation with artificial intelligence (DeP AI): Proof of concept

• Main Authors: Maria E. Powell, Marcelino Rodriguez Cancio, David Young, William Nock, Beshoy Abdelmessih, Amy Zeller, Irvin Perez Morales, Peng Zhang, C. Gaelyn Garrett, Douglas Schmidt, Jules White, Alexander Gelbard
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2019-06-01
• Series: Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
• Subjects: Voice disorders; detection; acoustic analysis; convolutional neural network; classification
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.259

Objective Acoustic analysis of voice has the potential to expedite detection and diagnosis of voice disorders. Applying an image‐based, neural‐network approach to analyzing the acoustic signal may be an effective means for detecting and differentially diagnosing voice disorders. The purpose of this study is to provide a proof‐of‐concept that embedded data within human phonation can be accurately and efficiently decoded with deep learning neural network analysis to differentiate between normal and disordered voices. Methods Acoustic recordings from 10 vocally‐healthy speakers, as well as 70 patients with one of seven voice disorders (n = 10 per diagnosis), were acquired from a clinical database. Acoustic signals were converted into spectrograms and used to train a convolutional neural network developed with the Keras library. The network architecture was trained separately for each of the seven diagnostic categories. Binary classification tasks (ie, to classify normal vs. disordered) were performed for each of the seven diagnostic categories. All models were validated using the 10‐fold cross‐validation technique. Results Binary classification averaged accuracies ranged from 58% to 90%. Models were most accurate in their classification of adductor spasmodic dysphonia, unilateral vocal fold paralysis, vocal fold polyp, polypoid corditis, and recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Despite a small sample size, these findings are consistent with previously published data utilizing deep neural networks for classification of voice disorders. Conclusion Promising preliminary results support further study of deep neural networks for clinical detection and diagnosis of human voice disorders. Current models should be optimized with a larger sample size. Levels of Evidence Level III