Test-retest reliability and measurement errors of grip strength test in patients with traumatic injuries in the upper extremity: a cross-sectional study

Abstract Background Grip strength (GS) test is an essential aspect of clinical practice with patients with upper extremity injuries. The random error of GS test was hypothesized to be proportional to the level of GS. The purpose of the current study was to estimate a precise range for the measuremen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhongfei Bai, Tian Shu, Wenxin Niu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-05-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-019-2623-z
id doaj-9a023f1082004548b07cd2ec743f0acb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9a023f1082004548b07cd2ec743f0acb2020-11-25T03:13:22ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742019-05-012011910.1186/s12891-019-2623-zTest-retest reliability and measurement errors of grip strength test in patients with traumatic injuries in the upper extremity: a cross-sectional studyZhongfei Bai0Tian Shu1Wenxin Niu2Department of Occupational Therapy, Shanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center)Department of Occupational Therapy, Shanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center)Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Tongji University School of MedicineAbstract Background Grip strength (GS) test is an essential aspect of clinical practice with patients with upper extremity injuries. The random error of GS test was hypothesized to be proportional to the level of GS. The purpose of the current study was to estimate a precise range for the measurement error of GS in patients following traumatic injuries in the upper extremity. Methods Following traumatic injuries in the upper extremity, 109 participants completed GS tests twice one weekend apart. The Bland-Altman plot analysis was adopted to estimate the precise limits of agreement with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results The mean of three consecutive trials had a higher intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.974 (95% CI = 0.963, 0.982) than those of one trial and the mean of the first two trials in injured upper extremities. When GS was ≤20 kg, the upper limit of agreement with 95% CI was estimated as (0.41 × average GS + 1.24), while the lower limit was estimated as (− 0.41 × average GS − 0.39). A table of one-to-one matches between averaged GS ≤ 20 kg and transformed ranges of random errors with 95% certainty was created; the standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change with 95% certainty of GS test were 1.8 and 4.9 kg, respectively. When GS was > 20 kg, the width of agreement with 95% CI ranged from − 4.9 to 5.3 kg, and the standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change with 95% certainty were 1.8 and 5.1 kg, respectively. Conclusion The one-to-one match table can be considered as a practical tool to judge a change in GS score is real or due to random errors when it is ≤20 kg.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-019-2623-zGrip strengthTest-retest reliabilityMeasurement errorMinimal detectable changeBland-Altman plotUpper extremity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zhongfei Bai
Tian Shu
Wenxin Niu
spellingShingle Zhongfei Bai
Tian Shu
Wenxin Niu
Test-retest reliability and measurement errors of grip strength test in patients with traumatic injuries in the upper extremity: a cross-sectional study
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Grip strength
Test-retest reliability
Measurement error
Minimal detectable change
Bland-Altman plot
Upper extremity
author_facet Zhongfei Bai
Tian Shu
Wenxin Niu
author_sort Zhongfei Bai
title Test-retest reliability and measurement errors of grip strength test in patients with traumatic injuries in the upper extremity: a cross-sectional study
title_short Test-retest reliability and measurement errors of grip strength test in patients with traumatic injuries in the upper extremity: a cross-sectional study
title_full Test-retest reliability and measurement errors of grip strength test in patients with traumatic injuries in the upper extremity: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Test-retest reliability and measurement errors of grip strength test in patients with traumatic injuries in the upper extremity: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Test-retest reliability and measurement errors of grip strength test in patients with traumatic injuries in the upper extremity: a cross-sectional study
title_sort test-retest reliability and measurement errors of grip strength test in patients with traumatic injuries in the upper extremity: a cross-sectional study
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Abstract Background Grip strength (GS) test is an essential aspect of clinical practice with patients with upper extremity injuries. The random error of GS test was hypothesized to be proportional to the level of GS. The purpose of the current study was to estimate a precise range for the measurement error of GS in patients following traumatic injuries in the upper extremity. Methods Following traumatic injuries in the upper extremity, 109 participants completed GS tests twice one weekend apart. The Bland-Altman plot analysis was adopted to estimate the precise limits of agreement with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results The mean of three consecutive trials had a higher intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.974 (95% CI = 0.963, 0.982) than those of one trial and the mean of the first two trials in injured upper extremities. When GS was ≤20 kg, the upper limit of agreement with 95% CI was estimated as (0.41 × average GS + 1.24), while the lower limit was estimated as (− 0.41 × average GS − 0.39). A table of one-to-one matches between averaged GS ≤ 20 kg and transformed ranges of random errors with 95% certainty was created; the standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change with 95% certainty of GS test were 1.8 and 4.9 kg, respectively. When GS was > 20 kg, the width of agreement with 95% CI ranged from − 4.9 to 5.3 kg, and the standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change with 95% certainty were 1.8 and 5.1 kg, respectively. Conclusion The one-to-one match table can be considered as a practical tool to judge a change in GS score is real or due to random errors when it is ≤20 kg.
topic Grip strength
Test-retest reliability
Measurement error
Minimal detectable change
Bland-Altman plot
Upper extremity
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-019-2623-z
work_keys_str_mv AT zhongfeibai testretestreliabilityandmeasurementerrorsofgripstrengthtestinpatientswithtraumaticinjuriesintheupperextremityacrosssectionalstudy
AT tianshu testretestreliabilityandmeasurementerrorsofgripstrengthtestinpatientswithtraumaticinjuriesintheupperextremityacrosssectionalstudy
AT wenxinniu testretestreliabilityandmeasurementerrorsofgripstrengthtestinpatientswithtraumaticinjuriesintheupperextremityacrosssectionalstudy
_version_ 1724647274344087552