Improved efficiency in eDNA metabarcoding of benthic metazoans by sieving sediments prior to DNA extraction

Abstract Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding can be used to rapidly characterize the taxon assemblage of benthic communities in sediments and thus has high potential to complement routine regulatory monitoring of benthic impacts. However, when using DNA extracted directly from subtidal sediments,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaoping He, Terri F. Sutherland, Cathryn L. Abbott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-07-01
Series:Environmental DNA
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.172
id doaj-9a023184c8314cbb86f05566ee584406
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9a023184c8314cbb86f05566ee5844062021-07-15T14:23:56ZengWileyEnvironmental DNA2637-49432021-07-013471672610.1002/edn3.172Improved efficiency in eDNA metabarcoding of benthic metazoans by sieving sediments prior to DNA extractionXiaoping He0Terri F. Sutherland1Cathryn L. Abbott2Pacific Biological Station Fisheries and Oceans Canada Nanaimo British Columbia CanadaPacific Science Enterprise Centre Fisheries and Oceans Canada West Vancouver British Columbia CanadaPacific Biological Station Fisheries and Oceans Canada Nanaimo British Columbia CanadaAbstract Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding can be used to rapidly characterize the taxon assemblage of benthic communities in sediments and thus has high potential to complement routine regulatory monitoring of benthic impacts. However, when using DNA extracted directly from subtidal sediments, only a small proportion of metazoan reads are obtained regardless of which available universal primers are used. Developing new metazoan‐specific primers for broad taxonomic amplification is very challenging and may not solve this problem; here, we investigate whether sieving sediments prior to DNA extraction provides a solution. The effect of sieving was tested on 84 sediment samples collected from two salmon farms. Average percentage of metazoan reads was 19.53% and 17.10% in nonsieved samples, and 81.03% and 89.92% in sieved samples at the two sites. Sieving effectively removed Ochrophyta taxa (e.g., seaweed and phytoplankton), but did not remove pelagic metazoans. Average percentage of benthic metazoan reads in sieved samples was 4.1 times of that in nonsieved samples (47.29% versus 11.46%) at one site and 5.7 times (20.03% versus 3.52%) at another. Sieving increased the number of benthic metazoan amplicon sequence variants by 27.67% and 51.30% at the two sites. Relative abundances of only a small fraction of benthic metazoan phyla showed significant differences between sieved and nonsieved samples. These differences can be taken into account when designing a benthic monitoring approach using eDNA metabarcoding. Since sediment sieving can be conducted either in the field or laboratory, and it allows many more samples to be multiplexed on one MiSeq run without compromising sequencing depth of benthic metazoan reads, we suggest this method can greatly increase the efficiency of eDNA metabarcoding for assessing benthic environments.https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.172benthic monitoringeDNA metabarcodingsalmon farmmeiofaunasediments
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiaoping He
Terri F. Sutherland
Cathryn L. Abbott
spellingShingle Xiaoping He
Terri F. Sutherland
Cathryn L. Abbott
Improved efficiency in eDNA metabarcoding of benthic metazoans by sieving sediments prior to DNA extraction
Environmental DNA
benthic monitoring
eDNA metabarcoding
salmon farm
meiofauna
sediments
author_facet Xiaoping He
Terri F. Sutherland
Cathryn L. Abbott
author_sort Xiaoping He
title Improved efficiency in eDNA metabarcoding of benthic metazoans by sieving sediments prior to DNA extraction
title_short Improved efficiency in eDNA metabarcoding of benthic metazoans by sieving sediments prior to DNA extraction
title_full Improved efficiency in eDNA metabarcoding of benthic metazoans by sieving sediments prior to DNA extraction
title_fullStr Improved efficiency in eDNA metabarcoding of benthic metazoans by sieving sediments prior to DNA extraction
title_full_unstemmed Improved efficiency in eDNA metabarcoding of benthic metazoans by sieving sediments prior to DNA extraction
title_sort improved efficiency in edna metabarcoding of benthic metazoans by sieving sediments prior to dna extraction
publisher Wiley
series Environmental DNA
issn 2637-4943
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Abstract Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding can be used to rapidly characterize the taxon assemblage of benthic communities in sediments and thus has high potential to complement routine regulatory monitoring of benthic impacts. However, when using DNA extracted directly from subtidal sediments, only a small proportion of metazoan reads are obtained regardless of which available universal primers are used. Developing new metazoan‐specific primers for broad taxonomic amplification is very challenging and may not solve this problem; here, we investigate whether sieving sediments prior to DNA extraction provides a solution. The effect of sieving was tested on 84 sediment samples collected from two salmon farms. Average percentage of metazoan reads was 19.53% and 17.10% in nonsieved samples, and 81.03% and 89.92% in sieved samples at the two sites. Sieving effectively removed Ochrophyta taxa (e.g., seaweed and phytoplankton), but did not remove pelagic metazoans. Average percentage of benthic metazoan reads in sieved samples was 4.1 times of that in nonsieved samples (47.29% versus 11.46%) at one site and 5.7 times (20.03% versus 3.52%) at another. Sieving increased the number of benthic metazoan amplicon sequence variants by 27.67% and 51.30% at the two sites. Relative abundances of only a small fraction of benthic metazoan phyla showed significant differences between sieved and nonsieved samples. These differences can be taken into account when designing a benthic monitoring approach using eDNA metabarcoding. Since sediment sieving can be conducted either in the field or laboratory, and it allows many more samples to be multiplexed on one MiSeq run without compromising sequencing depth of benthic metazoan reads, we suggest this method can greatly increase the efficiency of eDNA metabarcoding for assessing benthic environments.
topic benthic monitoring
eDNA metabarcoding
salmon farm
meiofauna
sediments
url https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.172
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaopinghe improvedefficiencyinednametabarcodingofbenthicmetazoansbysievingsedimentspriortodnaextraction
AT terrifsutherland improvedefficiencyinednametabarcodingofbenthicmetazoansbysievingsedimentspriortodnaextraction
AT cathrynlabbott improvedefficiencyinednametabarcodingofbenthicmetazoansbysievingsedimentspriortodnaextraction
_version_ 1721300158896930816