Walking in Each Other’s Footsteps: Do Animal Trail Makers Confer Resilience against Trampling Tourists?

Modern humans, and other hominins before them, have walked across the landscapes of most continents for many millennia. They shared these landscapes with other large animals, especially mammalian herbivores and their predators, whose footsteps defined trails through the vegetation. Most of the diver...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David B. Croft
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-07-01
Series:Environments
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3298/6/7/83
id doaj-99dbb37aeaf24651be307af2b4d743ac
record_format Article
spelling doaj-99dbb37aeaf24651be307af2b4d743ac2020-11-25T02:45:32ZengMDPI AGEnvironments2076-32982019-07-01678310.3390/environments6070083environments6070083Walking in Each Other’s Footsteps: Do Animal Trail Makers Confer Resilience against Trampling Tourists?David B. Croft0School of Biological Earth & Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, AustraliaModern humans, and other hominins before them, have walked across the landscapes of most continents for many millennia. They shared these landscapes with other large animals, especially mammalian herbivores and their predators, whose footsteps defined trails through the vegetation. Most of the diversity in the wild species is now concentrated in protected areas and visited by large numbers of tourists who may walk amongst them. This review examines the literature about medium-large animal and tourist trampling impacts to uncover any marriage between animal ecology and nature-based tourism research. Methodology is comparable. Animal ecology has focused on the propagation of grazing and trampling effects from a point source (usually water). Tourism research has focused on trail structure (formal/informal, hardened, wide/narrow) and the propagation of effects (especially weeds) into the hinterland and along the trail. There is little research to substantiate an evolutionary view of trampling impacts. At least tourists venturing off formed trails may reduce impacts by following animal trails with caveats, such as risk of encounters with dangerous animals and disruption of animal behavior. This is an under-studied topic but a fertile ground for research, aided by modern tools like trail cameras and geographically enabled devices borne by tourists.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3298/6/7/83tramplingnature-based tourismanimal ecologyanimal trailstourist trailswildlife tourism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David B. Croft
spellingShingle David B. Croft
Walking in Each Other’s Footsteps: Do Animal Trail Makers Confer Resilience against Trampling Tourists?
Environments
trampling
nature-based tourism
animal ecology
animal trails
tourist trails
wildlife tourism
author_facet David B. Croft
author_sort David B. Croft
title Walking in Each Other’s Footsteps: Do Animal Trail Makers Confer Resilience against Trampling Tourists?
title_short Walking in Each Other’s Footsteps: Do Animal Trail Makers Confer Resilience against Trampling Tourists?
title_full Walking in Each Other’s Footsteps: Do Animal Trail Makers Confer Resilience against Trampling Tourists?
title_fullStr Walking in Each Other’s Footsteps: Do Animal Trail Makers Confer Resilience against Trampling Tourists?
title_full_unstemmed Walking in Each Other’s Footsteps: Do Animal Trail Makers Confer Resilience against Trampling Tourists?
title_sort walking in each other’s footsteps: do animal trail makers confer resilience against trampling tourists?
publisher MDPI AG
series Environments
issn 2076-3298
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Modern humans, and other hominins before them, have walked across the landscapes of most continents for many millennia. They shared these landscapes with other large animals, especially mammalian herbivores and their predators, whose footsteps defined trails through the vegetation. Most of the diversity in the wild species is now concentrated in protected areas and visited by large numbers of tourists who may walk amongst them. This review examines the literature about medium-large animal and tourist trampling impacts to uncover any marriage between animal ecology and nature-based tourism research. Methodology is comparable. Animal ecology has focused on the propagation of grazing and trampling effects from a point source (usually water). Tourism research has focused on trail structure (formal/informal, hardened, wide/narrow) and the propagation of effects (especially weeds) into the hinterland and along the trail. There is little research to substantiate an evolutionary view of trampling impacts. At least tourists venturing off formed trails may reduce impacts by following animal trails with caveats, such as risk of encounters with dangerous animals and disruption of animal behavior. This is an under-studied topic but a fertile ground for research, aided by modern tools like trail cameras and geographically enabled devices borne by tourists.
topic trampling
nature-based tourism
animal ecology
animal trails
tourist trails
wildlife tourism
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3298/6/7/83
work_keys_str_mv AT davidbcroft walkingineachothersfootstepsdoanimaltrailmakersconferresilienceagainsttramplingtourists
_version_ 1724762196237352960