Beyond Poiseuille: Preservation Fluid Flow in an Experimental Model

Poiseuille’s equation describes the relationship between fluid viscosity, pressure, tubing diameter, and flow, yet it is not known if cold organ perfusion systems follow this equation. We investigated these relationships in an ex vivo model and aimed to offer some rationale for equipment selection....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saurabh Singh, Lucy V. Randle, Paul T. Callaghan, Christopher J. E. Watson, Chris J. Callaghan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:Journal of Transplantation
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/605326
id doaj-99d7d1a588d249e8a4e2e6e63b0bc2d9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-99d7d1a588d249e8a4e2e6e63b0bc2d92020-11-24T23:41:26ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Transplantation2090-00072090-00152013-01-01201310.1155/2013/605326605326Beyond Poiseuille: Preservation Fluid Flow in an Experimental ModelSaurabh Singh0Lucy V. Randle1Paul T. Callaghan2Christopher J. E. Watson3Chris J. Callaghan4University Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UKUniversity Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UKSchool of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New ZealandUniversity Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UKDepartment of Renal Surgery, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UKPoiseuille’s equation describes the relationship between fluid viscosity, pressure, tubing diameter, and flow, yet it is not known if cold organ perfusion systems follow this equation. We investigated these relationships in an ex vivo model and aimed to offer some rationale for equipment selection. Increasing the cannula size from 14 to 20 Fr increased flow rate by a mean (SD) of 13 (12)%. Marshall’s hyperosmolar citrate was three times less viscous than UW solution, but flows were only 45% faster. Doubling the bag pressure led to a mean (SD) flow rate increase of only 19 (13)%, not twice the rate. When external pressure devices were used, 100 mmHg of continuous pressure increased flow by a mean (SD) of 43 (17)% when compared to the same pressure applied initially only. Poiseuille’s equation was not followed; this is most likely due to “slipping” of preservation fluid within the plastic tubing. Cannula size made little difference over the ranges examined; flows are primarily determined by bag pressure and fluid viscosity. External infusor devices require continuous pressurisation to deliver high flow. Future studies examining the impact of perfusion variables on graft outcomes should include detailed equipment descriptions.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/605326
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Saurabh Singh
Lucy V. Randle
Paul T. Callaghan
Christopher J. E. Watson
Chris J. Callaghan
spellingShingle Saurabh Singh
Lucy V. Randle
Paul T. Callaghan
Christopher J. E. Watson
Chris J. Callaghan
Beyond Poiseuille: Preservation Fluid Flow in an Experimental Model
Journal of Transplantation
author_facet Saurabh Singh
Lucy V. Randle
Paul T. Callaghan
Christopher J. E. Watson
Chris J. Callaghan
author_sort Saurabh Singh
title Beyond Poiseuille: Preservation Fluid Flow in an Experimental Model
title_short Beyond Poiseuille: Preservation Fluid Flow in an Experimental Model
title_full Beyond Poiseuille: Preservation Fluid Flow in an Experimental Model
title_fullStr Beyond Poiseuille: Preservation Fluid Flow in an Experimental Model
title_full_unstemmed Beyond Poiseuille: Preservation Fluid Flow in an Experimental Model
title_sort beyond poiseuille: preservation fluid flow in an experimental model
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Transplantation
issn 2090-0007
2090-0015
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Poiseuille’s equation describes the relationship between fluid viscosity, pressure, tubing diameter, and flow, yet it is not known if cold organ perfusion systems follow this equation. We investigated these relationships in an ex vivo model and aimed to offer some rationale for equipment selection. Increasing the cannula size from 14 to 20 Fr increased flow rate by a mean (SD) of 13 (12)%. Marshall’s hyperosmolar citrate was three times less viscous than UW solution, but flows were only 45% faster. Doubling the bag pressure led to a mean (SD) flow rate increase of only 19 (13)%, not twice the rate. When external pressure devices were used, 100 mmHg of continuous pressure increased flow by a mean (SD) of 43 (17)% when compared to the same pressure applied initially only. Poiseuille’s equation was not followed; this is most likely due to “slipping” of preservation fluid within the plastic tubing. Cannula size made little difference over the ranges examined; flows are primarily determined by bag pressure and fluid viscosity. External infusor devices require continuous pressurisation to deliver high flow. Future studies examining the impact of perfusion variables on graft outcomes should include detailed equipment descriptions.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/605326
work_keys_str_mv AT saurabhsingh beyondpoiseuillepreservationfluidflowinanexperimentalmodel
AT lucyvrandle beyondpoiseuillepreservationfluidflowinanexperimentalmodel
AT paultcallaghan beyondpoiseuillepreservationfluidflowinanexperimentalmodel
AT christopherjewatson beyondpoiseuillepreservationfluidflowinanexperimentalmodel
AT chrisjcallaghan beyondpoiseuillepreservationfluidflowinanexperimentalmodel
_version_ 1725507368260730880