Clean Development Mechanism agricultural methodologies could help California to achieve AB 32 goals

California Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), passed in 2006, mandates reductions in California's greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. Charged with implementing the bill, the California Air Resources Board has identified emission reduction strategies, including nine for agriculture. The goal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ariel Dinar, Donald F. Larson, J. Aapris Frisbie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources 2012-10-01
Series:California Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:http://calag.ucanr.edu/archive/?article=ca.v066n04p137
id doaj-99d7215772c144be9d33540654ec8f38
record_format Article
spelling doaj-99d7215772c144be9d33540654ec8f382020-11-24T23:41:31ZengUniversity of California Agriculture and Natural ResourcesCalifornia Agriculture0008-08452160-80912012-10-0166413714310.3733/ca.v066n04p13710.3733/cav066n04_7Clean Development Mechanism agricultural methodologies could help California to achieve AB 32 goalsAriel Dinar0Donald F. Larson1J. Aapris Frisbie2A. Dinar is Professor of Environmental Economics and Policy, and Director, Water Science and Policy Center, Department of Environmental Sciences, UC RiversideD.F. Larson is Senior Economist, Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington, D.C.J.A. Frisbie is Graduate Student, Water Science and Policy Center, Department of Environmental Sciences, UC Riverside.California Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), passed in 2006, mandates reductions in California's greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. Charged with implementing the bill, the California Air Resources Board has identified emission reduction strategies, including nine for agriculture. The goals set for agriculture are voluntary, but because the agricultural sector represents a significant portion of both the state's economy and its greenhouse gas emissions, it offers considerable opportunities for mitigation activities. To reduce compliance costs, the Board's plan includes a cap-and-trade program that allows for offsets to be purchased from nonregulated firms that undertake mitigation in or outside the state. However, methodologies are needed to assess the impact of mitigating activities. Without them, emission reductions are expected to fall far short of potential. We review an existing international mechanism — the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) — that offers a framework for evaluating offset projects and advanced methodologies that could facilitate AB 32 implementation in California.http://calag.ucanr.edu/archive/?article=ca.v066n04p137agricultural landenvironmental programsNatural Resources
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ariel Dinar
Donald F. Larson
J. Aapris Frisbie
spellingShingle Ariel Dinar
Donald F. Larson
J. Aapris Frisbie
Clean Development Mechanism agricultural methodologies could help California to achieve AB 32 goals
California Agriculture
agricultural land
environmental programs
Natural Resources
author_facet Ariel Dinar
Donald F. Larson
J. Aapris Frisbie
author_sort Ariel Dinar
title Clean Development Mechanism agricultural methodologies could help California to achieve AB 32 goals
title_short Clean Development Mechanism agricultural methodologies could help California to achieve AB 32 goals
title_full Clean Development Mechanism agricultural methodologies could help California to achieve AB 32 goals
title_fullStr Clean Development Mechanism agricultural methodologies could help California to achieve AB 32 goals
title_full_unstemmed Clean Development Mechanism agricultural methodologies could help California to achieve AB 32 goals
title_sort clean development mechanism agricultural methodologies could help california to achieve ab 32 goals
publisher University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources
series California Agriculture
issn 0008-0845
2160-8091
publishDate 2012-10-01
description California Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), passed in 2006, mandates reductions in California's greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. Charged with implementing the bill, the California Air Resources Board has identified emission reduction strategies, including nine for agriculture. The goals set for agriculture are voluntary, but because the agricultural sector represents a significant portion of both the state's economy and its greenhouse gas emissions, it offers considerable opportunities for mitigation activities. To reduce compliance costs, the Board's plan includes a cap-and-trade program that allows for offsets to be purchased from nonregulated firms that undertake mitigation in or outside the state. However, methodologies are needed to assess the impact of mitigating activities. Without them, emission reductions are expected to fall far short of potential. We review an existing international mechanism — the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) — that offers a framework for evaluating offset projects and advanced methodologies that could facilitate AB 32 implementation in California.
topic agricultural land
environmental programs
Natural Resources
url http://calag.ucanr.edu/archive/?article=ca.v066n04p137
work_keys_str_mv AT arieldinar cleandevelopmentmechanismagriculturalmethodologiescouldhelpcaliforniatoachieveab32goals
AT donaldflarson cleandevelopmentmechanismagriculturalmethodologiescouldhelpcaliforniatoachieveab32goals
AT jaaprisfrisbie cleandevelopmentmechanismagriculturalmethodologiescouldhelpcaliforniatoachieveab32goals
_version_ 1725506907049820160