Phthalate exposure and neurodevelopment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human epidemiological evidence

Objective: We performed a systematic review of the epidemiology literature to identify the neurodevelopmental effects associated with phthalate exposure. Data sources and study eligibility criteria: Six phthalates were included in the review: di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), diisononyl phthalate (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elizabeth G. Radke, Joseph M. Braun, Rebecca M. Nachman, Glinda S. Cooper
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-04-01
Series:Environment International
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412019318021
id doaj-9999f40f08e54ac48c474f9f30d25f37
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9999f40f08e54ac48c474f9f30d25f372020-11-25T02:34:56ZengElsevierEnvironment International0160-41202020-04-01137Phthalate exposure and neurodevelopment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human epidemiological evidenceElizabeth G. Radke0Joseph M. Braun1Rebecca M. Nachman2Glinda S. Cooper3U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Assessment, United States; Corresponding author.Brown University, School of Public Health, United StatesU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Assessment, United StatesU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Assessment, United States; The Innocence Project, United StatesObjective: We performed a systematic review of the epidemiology literature to identify the neurodevelopmental effects associated with phthalate exposure. Data sources and study eligibility criteria: Six phthalates were included in the review: di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), diisononyl phthalate (DINP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), diisobutyl phthalate (DIBP), butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP), and diethyl phthalate (DEP). The initial literature search (of PubMed, Web of Science, and Toxline) included all studies of neurodevelopmental effects in humans, and outcomes were selected for full systematic review based on data availability. Study evaluation and synthesis methods: Studies of neurodevelopmental effects were evaluated using criteria defined a priori for risk of bias and sensitivity by two reviewers using a domain-based approach. Evidence was synthesized by outcome and phthalate and strength of evidence was summarized using a structured framework. For studies of cognition and motor effects in children ≤4 years old, a random effects meta-analysis was performed. Results: The primary outcomes reviewed here are (number of studies in parentheses): cognition (14), motor effects (9), behavior, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (20), infant behavior (3), and social behavior, including autism spectrum disorder (7). For each phthalate/outcome combination, there was slight or indeterminate evidence of an association, with the exception of motor effects for BBP, which had moderate evidence. Conclusions and implications of key findings: Overall, there is not a clear pattern of association between prenatal phthalate exposures and neurodevelopment. There are several possible reasons for the observed null associations related to exposure misclassification, periods of heightened susceptibility, sex-specific effects, and the effects of phthalate mixtures. Until these limitations are adequately addressed in the epidemiology literature, these findings should not be interpreted as evidence that there are no neurodevelopmental effects of phthalate exposure.The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the U.S. EPA.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412019318021
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elizabeth G. Radke
Joseph M. Braun
Rebecca M. Nachman
Glinda S. Cooper
spellingShingle Elizabeth G. Radke
Joseph M. Braun
Rebecca M. Nachman
Glinda S. Cooper
Phthalate exposure and neurodevelopment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human epidemiological evidence
Environment International
author_facet Elizabeth G. Radke
Joseph M. Braun
Rebecca M. Nachman
Glinda S. Cooper
author_sort Elizabeth G. Radke
title Phthalate exposure and neurodevelopment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human epidemiological evidence
title_short Phthalate exposure and neurodevelopment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human epidemiological evidence
title_full Phthalate exposure and neurodevelopment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human epidemiological evidence
title_fullStr Phthalate exposure and neurodevelopment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human epidemiological evidence
title_full_unstemmed Phthalate exposure and neurodevelopment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human epidemiological evidence
title_sort phthalate exposure and neurodevelopment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of human epidemiological evidence
publisher Elsevier
series Environment International
issn 0160-4120
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Objective: We performed a systematic review of the epidemiology literature to identify the neurodevelopmental effects associated with phthalate exposure. Data sources and study eligibility criteria: Six phthalates were included in the review: di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), diisononyl phthalate (DINP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), diisobutyl phthalate (DIBP), butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP), and diethyl phthalate (DEP). The initial literature search (of PubMed, Web of Science, and Toxline) included all studies of neurodevelopmental effects in humans, and outcomes were selected for full systematic review based on data availability. Study evaluation and synthesis methods: Studies of neurodevelopmental effects were evaluated using criteria defined a priori for risk of bias and sensitivity by two reviewers using a domain-based approach. Evidence was synthesized by outcome and phthalate and strength of evidence was summarized using a structured framework. For studies of cognition and motor effects in children ≤4 years old, a random effects meta-analysis was performed. Results: The primary outcomes reviewed here are (number of studies in parentheses): cognition (14), motor effects (9), behavior, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (20), infant behavior (3), and social behavior, including autism spectrum disorder (7). For each phthalate/outcome combination, there was slight or indeterminate evidence of an association, with the exception of motor effects for BBP, which had moderate evidence. Conclusions and implications of key findings: Overall, there is not a clear pattern of association between prenatal phthalate exposures and neurodevelopment. There are several possible reasons for the observed null associations related to exposure misclassification, periods of heightened susceptibility, sex-specific effects, and the effects of phthalate mixtures. Until these limitations are adequately addressed in the epidemiology literature, these findings should not be interpreted as evidence that there are no neurodevelopmental effects of phthalate exposure.The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the U.S. EPA.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412019318021
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethgradke phthalateexposureandneurodevelopmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanepidemiologicalevidence
AT josephmbraun phthalateexposureandneurodevelopmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanepidemiologicalevidence
AT rebeccamnachman phthalateexposureandneurodevelopmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanepidemiologicalevidence
AT glindascooper phthalateexposureandneurodevelopmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanepidemiologicalevidence
_version_ 1724806398366187520