Comparison of Results of Cycles Treated with Modified Mild Protocol and Short Protocol for Ovarian Stimulation

Comparison of Results of Cycles Treated with Modified Mild Protocol and Short Protocol for Ovarian Stimulation

The ovarian stimulation has been applied in order to increase the number of oocytes to compensate for the poor results of in vitro fertilization, allowing the selection of one or more embryos to be transferred. Our aim is to compare the results obtained in IVF/ICSI cycles using the short protocol fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	F. Coelho, L. F. Aguiar, G. S. P. Cunha, N. Cardinot, E. Lucena
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Hindawi Limited 2014-01-01
Series:	International Journal of Reproductive Medicine
Online Access:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/367474

Similar Items

The impact of different ovarian stimulation protocols on embryological stage and efectiveness of ivf cycles
by: M G Andreeva, et al.
Published: (2016-02-01)

ICSI cycles in women over 40 years: analysis of 3 different ovarian stimulation protocols
by: H. Sibai, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)

Comparison of Dydrogesterone and Medroxyprogesterone in the Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol for Patients With Poor Ovarian Response
by: Junwei Zhang, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)

Comparison Pregnancy Outcomes Between Minimal Stimulation Protocol and Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocols in Poor Ovarian Responders
by: Shamim Pilehvari, et al.
Published: (2016-05-01)

Challenges and Considerations in Optimizing Ovarian Stimulation Protocols in Oncofertility Patients
by: Kathryn Dominica Coyne, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01)

Impact of GnRH ovarian stimulation protocols on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes
by: Silva Joaquina, et al.
Published: (2009-01-01)

Ovarian response of Suffolk ewes to estrous synchronization using short-term protocol
by: Luciana Takada, et al.
Published: (2012-02-01)

Anti-müllerian Hormone for the Prediction of Ovarian Response in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol for IVF
by: Jialyu Huang, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01)

Letrozole+ GnRH antagonist stimulation protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: An RCT
by: Mahbod Ebrahimi, et al.
Published: (2017-08-01)

Overriding follicle selection in controlled ovarian stimulation protocols: Quality vs quantity
by: Zelinski-Wooten Mary B, et al.
Published: (2004-06-01)

Outcomes of fertility preservation in women with endometriosis: comparison of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus antagonist protocols
by: Emmanuelle Mathieu d’Argent, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01)

Outcomes of anti-Müllerian hormone-tailored ovarian stimulation protocols in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles in women of advanced age
by: Chi-Chun Liao, et al.
Published: (2016-04-01)

Effects of human menopausal gonadotropin on zona pellucida and pregnancy outcomes of ovarian stimulation protocols
by: Bing He, et al.
Published: (2015-06-01)

"hCG priming" effect in controlled ovarian stimulation through a long protocol
by: Antsaklis Aris, et al.
Published: (2009-08-01)

Hormonal, functional and genetic biomarkers in controlled ovarian stimulation: tools for matching patients and protocols
by: Alviggi Carlo, et al.
Published: (2012-02-01)

LH supplementation of ovarian stimulation protocols influences follicular fluid steroid composition contributing to the improvement of ovarian response in poor responder women
by: S. Marchiani, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)

Intraindividual Embryo Morphokinetics Are Not Affected by a Switch of the Ovarian Stimulation Protocol Between GnRH Agonist vs. Antagonist Regimens in Consecutive Cycles
by: Jens E. Dietrich, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01)

Hormonal, follicular and endometrial dynamics in letrozole-treated versus natural cycles in patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation
by: Brunengraber Lisa N, et al.
Published: (2011-06-01)

A flexible short protocol in women with poor ovarian response over 40 years old
by: Xinyue Zhang, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

Relationship between ultrasound parameters and intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in polycystic ovarian syndrome treated by non agonist step up stimulation protocol
by: Yasser Ibrahim Orief, et al.
Published: (2015-06-01)

Effects of a Low-dose Leuprorelin Long Protocol on the Ovarian Response and Cycle Outcome in IVF
by: Yu-Chiao Yi, et al.
Published: (2004-06-01)

Comparison of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome who are participating in an IVF programme: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
by: Meng Ma, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)

Modified Eye Movement Desensitization Therapy Protocol Treating Substance Abuse Disorders
by: Von Tersch, Elise
Published: (2019)

Comparison of GnRH Agonist, GnRH Antagonist, and GnRH Antagonist Mild Protocol of Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation in Good Prognosis Patients
by: Martin Stimpfel, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Validating the Use of Corifollitropin Alfa in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol on Normal and High Responders by Comparing with Conventional Antagonist Protocol: A Retrospective Study
by: Chen-Yu Huang, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)

A specific controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol for fertility preservation in women with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy
by: Felipe Cavagna, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01)

Evaluation of a new standardized modified ramp protocol : the modified BSU ramp protocol
by: Horn, Stacey Lynn
Published: (2011)

Body Mass Index Showed No Impact on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol
by: Zhe Yang, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

Predictive factors of ovarian response to GnRH antagonist stimulation protocol: AMH and age are potential candidates
by: Mohammed M. Laqqan, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01)

GNRH antagonists in oocyte donor cycles: the key to safe, simple and efficient stimulation protocols
by: Bodri, Daniel
Published: (2011)

The IVF Outcome Counseling Based on the Model Combining DHEAS and Age in Patients with Low AMH Prior to the First Cycle of GnRH Antagonist Protocol of Ovarian Stimulation
by: Miro Šimun Alebić, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)

Studying the relationships of embryonic early cleavage in different ovarian stimulating protocols and the changes of matrix metalloproteinase activity in follicular fluid during human in vitro fertilization cycles
by: Yang, Wen-Jui, et al.
Published: (2016)

The Validation of a Short-cycle Formative Assessment Observation Protocol for Science and Mathematics Instruction
by: Heitz, Layne
Published: (2013)

Effect of Bushen Yutai Recipe on IVF Patients Subjected to Mild Ovarian Stimulation
by: Xiaomei Jiang, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)

Milder is better? advantages and disadvantages of "mild" ovarian stimulation for human in vitro fertilization
by: Delle Piane Luisa, et al.
Published: (2011-02-01)

Upright versus recumbent cycle ergometry using a modified Y-way protocol
by: Talbot, Shaun Marie
Published: (1994)

A novel GnRH-antagonist protocol by switching to medroxyprogesterone when patients being at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome during ovarian stimulation
by: Ting-Chi Huang, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)

Investigation of pregnancy outcome and ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome prevention in agonist and antagonist gonadotropin-releasing hormone protocol
by: Behnaz Khani Rabati, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01)

The presence of dominant follicles and corpora lutea does not perturb response to controlled ovarian stimulation in random start protocols
by: Francesca Filippi, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)

Comparison of the Cumulative Live Birth Rates of Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation and Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocols in Patients With Low Prognosis
by: Mingze Du, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_hd194qicdoch69vfjr28e1mc8u