Do combination HIV prevention programmes result in increased empowerment, inclusion and agency to demand equal rights for marginalised populations in low-income and middle-income countries? A systematic review

IntroductionThis systematic review aims to determine if combination HIV prevention programmes include outcome measures for empowerment, inclusion and agency to demand equal rights and measure the relationship between empowerment and HIV prevention outcomes.MethodsAn electronic literature search of P...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marija Pantelic, Siyan Yi, Carinne Brody, Say Sok, Sovannary Tuot, Enrique Restoy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-01
Series:BMJ Global Health
Online Access:https://gh.bmj.com/content/4/5/e001560.full
id doaj-9981e20e73b24affb9f1453c81a71a4d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9981e20e73b24affb9f1453c81a71a4d2021-04-18T12:00:33ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Global Health2059-79082019-09-014510.1136/bmjgh-2019-001560Do combination HIV prevention programmes result in increased empowerment, inclusion and agency to demand equal rights for marginalised populations in low-income and middle-income countries? A systematic reviewMarija Pantelic0Siyan Yi1Carinne Brody2Say Sok3Sovannary Tuot4Enrique Restoy5Department of Social Policy and Intervention, Oxford University, Oxford, UKKHANA Center for Population Health Research, KHANA Cambodia, Phnom Penh, CambodiaCenter for Global Health Research, Touro University California, Vallejo, California, USAKHANA Center for Population Health Research, Phnom Penh, CambodiaKHANA Center for Population Health Research, KHANA Cambodia, Phnom Penh, CambodiaFrontline AIDS, Brighton, UKIntroductionThis systematic review aims to determine if combination HIV prevention programmes include outcome measures for empowerment, inclusion and agency to demand equal rights and measure the relationship between empowerment and HIV prevention outcomes.MethodsAn electronic literature search of PubMed, POPLINE, Index Medicus and Google Scholar was conducted between August and October 2018. We included studies that evaluated combination prevention programmes that had all three types of intervention components and that specifically serve members of populations disproportionately affected by HIV published from 2008 to 2018. The selected studies were screened for inclusion, and relevant data abstracted, assessed for bias and synthesised.ResultsThis review included a total of 15 studies. Findings indicate that combination HIV prevention programmes for marginalised populations have delivered a variety of theory-based behavioural and structural interventions that support improvements in empowerment, inclusion and agency. However, empowerment, inclusion and least of all agency are not measured consistently or in a standardised way. In addition, analysis of their relationships with HIV prevention outcomes is rare. Out of our 15 included studies, only two measured a relationship between an empowerment, inclusion or agency outcome and an HIV prevention outcome.ConclusionThese findings suggest that policy-makers, programme planners and researchers might need to consider the intermediate steps on the pathway to increased condom use and HIV testing so as to explain the ‘how’ of their achievements and inform future investments in HIV prevention. This will support replication and expansion of programmes and ensure sustainability of the programmes.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018106909https://gh.bmj.com/content/4/5/e001560.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marija Pantelic
Siyan Yi
Carinne Brody
Say Sok
Sovannary Tuot
Enrique Restoy
spellingShingle Marija Pantelic
Siyan Yi
Carinne Brody
Say Sok
Sovannary Tuot
Enrique Restoy
Do combination HIV prevention programmes result in increased empowerment, inclusion and agency to demand equal rights for marginalised populations in low-income and middle-income countries? A systematic review
BMJ Global Health
author_facet Marija Pantelic
Siyan Yi
Carinne Brody
Say Sok
Sovannary Tuot
Enrique Restoy
author_sort Marija Pantelic
title Do combination HIV prevention programmes result in increased empowerment, inclusion and agency to demand equal rights for marginalised populations in low-income and middle-income countries? A systematic review
title_short Do combination HIV prevention programmes result in increased empowerment, inclusion and agency to demand equal rights for marginalised populations in low-income and middle-income countries? A systematic review
title_full Do combination HIV prevention programmes result in increased empowerment, inclusion and agency to demand equal rights for marginalised populations in low-income and middle-income countries? A systematic review
title_fullStr Do combination HIV prevention programmes result in increased empowerment, inclusion and agency to demand equal rights for marginalised populations in low-income and middle-income countries? A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Do combination HIV prevention programmes result in increased empowerment, inclusion and agency to demand equal rights for marginalised populations in low-income and middle-income countries? A systematic review
title_sort do combination hiv prevention programmes result in increased empowerment, inclusion and agency to demand equal rights for marginalised populations in low-income and middle-income countries? a systematic review
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Global Health
issn 2059-7908
publishDate 2019-09-01
description IntroductionThis systematic review aims to determine if combination HIV prevention programmes include outcome measures for empowerment, inclusion and agency to demand equal rights and measure the relationship between empowerment and HIV prevention outcomes.MethodsAn electronic literature search of PubMed, POPLINE, Index Medicus and Google Scholar was conducted between August and October 2018. We included studies that evaluated combination prevention programmes that had all three types of intervention components and that specifically serve members of populations disproportionately affected by HIV published from 2008 to 2018. The selected studies were screened for inclusion, and relevant data abstracted, assessed for bias and synthesised.ResultsThis review included a total of 15 studies. Findings indicate that combination HIV prevention programmes for marginalised populations have delivered a variety of theory-based behavioural and structural interventions that support improvements in empowerment, inclusion and agency. However, empowerment, inclusion and least of all agency are not measured consistently or in a standardised way. In addition, analysis of their relationships with HIV prevention outcomes is rare. Out of our 15 included studies, only two measured a relationship between an empowerment, inclusion or agency outcome and an HIV prevention outcome.ConclusionThese findings suggest that policy-makers, programme planners and researchers might need to consider the intermediate steps on the pathway to increased condom use and HIV testing so as to explain the ‘how’ of their achievements and inform future investments in HIV prevention. This will support replication and expansion of programmes and ensure sustainability of the programmes.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018106909
url https://gh.bmj.com/content/4/5/e001560.full
work_keys_str_mv AT marijapantelic docombinationhivpreventionprogrammesresultinincreasedempowermentinclusionandagencytodemandequalrightsformarginalisedpopulationsinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT siyanyi docombinationhivpreventionprogrammesresultinincreasedempowermentinclusionandagencytodemandequalrightsformarginalisedpopulationsinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT carinnebrody docombinationhivpreventionprogrammesresultinincreasedempowermentinclusionandagencytodemandequalrightsformarginalisedpopulationsinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT saysok docombinationhivpreventionprogrammesresultinincreasedempowermentinclusionandagencytodemandequalrightsformarginalisedpopulationsinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT sovannarytuot docombinationhivpreventionprogrammesresultinincreasedempowermentinclusionandagencytodemandequalrightsformarginalisedpopulationsinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT enriquerestoy docombinationhivpreventionprogrammesresultinincreasedempowermentinclusionandagencytodemandequalrightsformarginalisedpopulationsinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
_version_ 1721521845890449408