The Blind Spot of Balkanism
The treatment of Macedonia in Todorova’s theoretical “bestseller” confirms the incorporated effect of both a historically and culturally grounded neglect as well as a hidden orientalization of the Macedonian Other. In other words, the presence of a blind spot at the very core of balkanism, oversh...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University American College Skopje
2018-12-01
|
Series: | AICEI Proceedings |
Online Access: | http://www.aicei.uacs.edu.mk/document/df421b41-5dcc-f584-9bf4-d5b587a77dfb |
id |
doaj-99802c9766354dfda13a9be86a868371 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-99802c9766354dfda13a9be86a8683712021-04-06T17:21:10ZengUniversity American College SkopjeAICEI Proceedings2671-37132671-37132018-12-01131https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4553913The Blind Spot of BalkanismElizabeta ShelevaThe treatment of Macedonia in Todorova’s theoretical “bestseller” confirms the incorporated effect of both a historically and culturally grounded neglect as well as a hidden orientalization of the Macedonian Other. In other words, the presence of a blind spot at the very core of balkanism, overshading its declarative emancipatory approach, otherwise implemented in the book. The process of the perpetual “othering” of Macedonia can be recognized this time through the tendency of Todorova’s book to (re)present and describe Macedonia, using simply the perspective of a landscape, whilst unconsciously or, rather, intentionally omitting its historical, and also its contemporary achievements. More precisely, Macedonia’s prominent authors and their work, referring to the topic of Balkan, in the domain of art and culture, which today are also well known abroad. This process of “landscapization” or exoticizing is already recognized as one of the fundamentally colonizing discursive strategies, thereby justifying its paternalist attitude of dominance over the exotic Other. Therefore, we hope that the author, for the sake of true post-colonial objectivity and open-mindedness, could take into consideration our academic objection and compensate for it, by simply adding the names, as well as the creative contribution of Macedonian authors, artists and intellectuals, in future editions of her book.http://www.aicei.uacs.edu.mk/document/df421b41-5dcc-f584-9bf4-d5b587a77dfb |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Elizabeta Sheleva |
spellingShingle |
Elizabeta Sheleva The Blind Spot of Balkanism AICEI Proceedings |
author_facet |
Elizabeta Sheleva |
author_sort |
Elizabeta Sheleva |
title |
The Blind Spot of Balkanism |
title_short |
The Blind Spot of Balkanism |
title_full |
The Blind Spot of Balkanism |
title_fullStr |
The Blind Spot of Balkanism |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Blind Spot of Balkanism |
title_sort |
blind spot of balkanism |
publisher |
University American College Skopje |
series |
AICEI Proceedings |
issn |
2671-3713 2671-3713 |
publishDate |
2018-12-01 |
description |
The treatment of Macedonia in Todorova’s theoretical “bestseller”
confirms the incorporated effect of both a historically and culturally grounded neglect as
well as a hidden orientalization of the Macedonian Other. In other words, the presence of a
blind spot at the very core of balkanism, overshading its declarative emancipatory approach,
otherwise implemented in the book. The process of the perpetual “othering” of Macedonia
can be recognized this time through the tendency of Todorova’s book to (re)present and
describe Macedonia, using simply the perspective of a landscape, whilst unconsciously or,
rather, intentionally omitting its historical, and also its contemporary achievements. More
precisely, Macedonia’s prominent authors and their work, referring to the topic of Balkan,
in the domain of art and culture, which today are also well known abroad. This process of
“landscapization” or exoticizing is already recognized as one of the fundamentally colonizing
discursive strategies, thereby justifying its paternalist attitude of dominance over the exotic
Other. Therefore, we hope that the author, for the sake of true post-colonial objectivity and
open-mindedness, could take into consideration our academic objection and compensate for
it, by simply adding the names, as well as the creative contribution of Macedonian authors,
artists and intellectuals, in future editions of her book. |
url |
http://www.aicei.uacs.edu.mk/document/df421b41-5dcc-f584-9bf4-d5b587a77dfb |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT elizabetasheleva theblindspotofbalkanism AT elizabetasheleva blindspotofbalkanism |
_version_ |
1721537585108484096 |