Accessibility in the provinces of Finland

Relative, mean and integral accessibility in the existing provinces of Finland and in the proposed new provinces was studied applying graph theory, through evaluating the shapes of the provinces by reference to polygonal graphs, and, in a more detailed analysis, through using flow graphs to represen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Markku Tykkyläinen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Geographical Society of Finland 1981-02-01
Series:Fennia: International Journal of Geography
Online Access:https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/9158
id doaj-9972fb17d44749d6b93fa18a56d38615
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9972fb17d44749d6b93fa18a56d386152020-11-25T02:11:19ZengGeographical Society of FinlandFennia: International Journal of Geography1798-56171981-02-01159210.11143/fennia.9158Accessibility in the provinces of FinlandMarkku Tykkyläinen0Department of Geography, University of JoensuuRelative, mean and integral accessibility in the existing provinces of Finland and in the proposed new provinces was studied applying graph theory, through evaluating the shapes of the provinces by reference to polygonal graphs, and, in a more detailed analysis, through using flow graphs to represent the accessibility between locations. The sensitivity of the ac­cessibility structure was tested by means of two simulation experiments. The poorest accessibility levels existed in the more northerly provinces, although some provinces weak in this respect could also be found in Southern and Central Finland, especially when accessibility was studied in relation to the size of the province. This correlates with a certain backwardness in the development of the administrative regions in relation to population development. The proposed province revisions have not corrected this situation entirely. The locations of the provincial capitals are close to the (pareto‑)optimum in general, the non‑optimal cases being ones in which the most significant centres of population growth have been located elsewhere than in the provincial capital or its immediate sur­roundings. Integral accessibility as a measure of optimal location is not sensitive to changes in spatial structure, and extremely large movements of population would be required to cause any substantial alteration in the location of the optimal centre. https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/9158
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Markku Tykkyläinen
spellingShingle Markku Tykkyläinen
Accessibility in the provinces of Finland
Fennia: International Journal of Geography
author_facet Markku Tykkyläinen
author_sort Markku Tykkyläinen
title Accessibility in the provinces of Finland
title_short Accessibility in the provinces of Finland
title_full Accessibility in the provinces of Finland
title_fullStr Accessibility in the provinces of Finland
title_full_unstemmed Accessibility in the provinces of Finland
title_sort accessibility in the provinces of finland
publisher Geographical Society of Finland
series Fennia: International Journal of Geography
issn 1798-5617
publishDate 1981-02-01
description Relative, mean and integral accessibility in the existing provinces of Finland and in the proposed new provinces was studied applying graph theory, through evaluating the shapes of the provinces by reference to polygonal graphs, and, in a more detailed analysis, through using flow graphs to represent the accessibility between locations. The sensitivity of the ac­cessibility structure was tested by means of two simulation experiments. The poorest accessibility levels existed in the more northerly provinces, although some provinces weak in this respect could also be found in Southern and Central Finland, especially when accessibility was studied in relation to the size of the province. This correlates with a certain backwardness in the development of the administrative regions in relation to population development. The proposed province revisions have not corrected this situation entirely. The locations of the provincial capitals are close to the (pareto‑)optimum in general, the non‑optimal cases being ones in which the most significant centres of population growth have been located elsewhere than in the provincial capital or its immediate sur­roundings. Integral accessibility as a measure of optimal location is not sensitive to changes in spatial structure, and extremely large movements of population would be required to cause any substantial alteration in the location of the optimal centre.
url https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/9158
work_keys_str_mv AT markkutykkylainen accessibilityintheprovincesoffinland
_version_ 1724915035940061184