Old and new legal limits to wiretaps use in the Italian legal system

The relationship between the means for obtaining evidence and the use of their results represents one of the most problematic profiles of the criminal procedure code, on which are measured the basic values of the whole system. This dualism shows really delicate features in the wiretaps matter, where...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea Zampini, Wanda Nocerino
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal 2021-08-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/504
id doaj-9962ea95216340a8917f5f270a369fc6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9962ea95216340a8917f5f270a369fc62021-08-29T22:07:21ZspaInstituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual PenalRevista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal2525-510X2021-08-017210.22197/rbdpp.v7i2.504232Old and new legal limits to wiretaps use in the Italian legal systemAndrea Zampini0Wanda Nocerino1Sapienza Università di RomaUniversità di FoggiaThe relationship between the means for obtaining evidence and the use of their results represents one of the most problematic profiles of the criminal procedure code, on which are measured the basic values of the whole system. This dualism shows really delicate features in the wiretaps matter, where a serious offense to the communications secrecy and to privacy ensures extremely effective investigative results; the identification of an acceptable balance between fundamental rights protection and criminal investigation needs is therefore extremely difficult. In this framework are sketched both the regulation on the unusability of unlawful interceptions (art. 271 c.p.p.) and the one which determines the use prohibitions of wiretaps settled up in other proceedings (art. 270 c.p.p.). After an overview of the state of the art and of the latest jurisprudential approaches to the topic, the Authors – also in the light of the new technologies at the service of public authorities and of the reforms that have recently interested the matter – wonder about the effects that the non-usable proof may have on the evidence it helped to acquire.http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/504mezzi di ricerca della provaintercettazioni di conversazioni e comunicazionicaptatore informaticoinutilizzabilitàilliceità.
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrea Zampini
Wanda Nocerino
spellingShingle Andrea Zampini
Wanda Nocerino
Old and new legal limits to wiretaps use in the Italian legal system
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
mezzi di ricerca della prova
intercettazioni di conversazioni e comunicazioni
captatore informatico
inutilizzabilità
illiceità.
author_facet Andrea Zampini
Wanda Nocerino
author_sort Andrea Zampini
title Old and new legal limits to wiretaps use in the Italian legal system
title_short Old and new legal limits to wiretaps use in the Italian legal system
title_full Old and new legal limits to wiretaps use in the Italian legal system
title_fullStr Old and new legal limits to wiretaps use in the Italian legal system
title_full_unstemmed Old and new legal limits to wiretaps use in the Italian legal system
title_sort old and new legal limits to wiretaps use in the italian legal system
publisher Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal
series Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
issn 2525-510X
publishDate 2021-08-01
description The relationship between the means for obtaining evidence and the use of their results represents one of the most problematic profiles of the criminal procedure code, on which are measured the basic values of the whole system. This dualism shows really delicate features in the wiretaps matter, where a serious offense to the communications secrecy and to privacy ensures extremely effective investigative results; the identification of an acceptable balance between fundamental rights protection and criminal investigation needs is therefore extremely difficult. In this framework are sketched both the regulation on the unusability of unlawful interceptions (art. 271 c.p.p.) and the one which determines the use prohibitions of wiretaps settled up in other proceedings (art. 270 c.p.p.). After an overview of the state of the art and of the latest jurisprudential approaches to the topic, the Authors – also in the light of the new technologies at the service of public authorities and of the reforms that have recently interested the matter – wonder about the effects that the non-usable proof may have on the evidence it helped to acquire.
topic mezzi di ricerca della prova
intercettazioni di conversazioni e comunicazioni
captatore informatico
inutilizzabilità
illiceità.
url http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/504
work_keys_str_mv AT andreazampini oldandnewlegallimitstowiretapsuseintheitalianlegalsystem
AT wandanocerino oldandnewlegallimitstowiretapsuseintheitalianlegalsystem
_version_ 1721186235727216640