Risk of COVID-19 infection after cardiac electrophysiology procedures

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, attempts to conserve resources and limit virus spread have resulted in delay of nonemergent procedures across all medical specialties, including cardiac electrophysiology (EP). Many patients have delayed care and continue to express concerns about potential...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Virginia Workman, MD, James V. Freeman, MD, Edinrin R. Obasare, MBBS, Shashank Jain, MD, Raj Ganeshan, MD, Alicia Burr, APRN, MSN, Mark Blitzer, MD, Joseph Akar, MD, Rachel Lampert, MD, FHRS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-10-01
Series:Heart Rhythm O2
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266650182030115X
id doaj-995ac667a4084043984b3377221d1dc5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-995ac667a4084043984b3377221d1dc52021-09-03T04:47:23ZengElsevierHeart Rhythm O22666-50182020-10-0114239242Risk of COVID-19 infection after cardiac electrophysiology proceduresVirginia Workman, MD0James V. Freeman, MD1Edinrin R. Obasare, MBBS2Shashank Jain, MD3Raj Ganeshan, MD4Alicia Burr, APRN, MSN5Mark Blitzer, MD6Joseph Akar, MD7Rachel Lampert, MD, FHRS8Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, ConnecticutYale School of Medicine, New Haven, ConnecticutYale School of Medicine, New Haven, ConnecticutYale School of Medicine, New Haven, ConnecticutYale School of Medicine, New Haven, ConnecticutYale School of Medicine, New Haven, ConnecticutArrhythmia Center of CT, New Haven, ConnecticutYale School of Medicine, New Haven, ConnecticutYale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Address reprint requests and correspondence: Dr Rachel Lampert, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, Dana 319, 789 Howard Ave, New Haven, CT 06510.Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, attempts to conserve resources and limit virus spread have resulted in delay of nonemergent procedures across all medical specialties, including cardiac electrophysiology (EP). Many patients have delayed care and continue to express concerns about potential nosocomial spread of coronavirus. Objective: To quantify risk of development of COVID-19 owing to in-hospital transmission related to an EP procedure, in the setting of preventive measures instituted in our laboratory areas. Methods: We contacted patients by telephone who underwent emergent procedures in the electrophysiology lab during the COVID-19 surge at our hospital (March 16, 2020, to May 15, 2020, reaching daily census 450 COVID-19 patients,) ≥2 weeks after the procedure, to assess for symptoms of and/or testing for COVID-19, and assessed outcomes from medical record review. Results: Of the 124 patients undergoing EP procedures in this period, none had developed documented or suspected coronavirus infection. Seven patients described symptoms of chest pain, dyspnea, or fever; 3 were tested for coronavirus and found to be negative. Of the remaining 4, 2 had a more plausible alternative explanation for the symptoms, and 2 had transient symptoms not meeting published criteria for probable COVID-19 infection. Conclusion: Despite a high hospital census of COVID-19 patients during the period of hospital stay for an EP procedure, there were no likely COVID-19 infections occurring in follow-up of at least 2 weeks. With proper use of preventive measures as recommended by published guidelines, the risk of nosocomial spread of COVID-19 to patients in the EP lab is low.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266650182030115XAblationCoronavirusElectrophysiologyImplantationNosocomial transmission
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Virginia Workman, MD
James V. Freeman, MD
Edinrin R. Obasare, MBBS
Shashank Jain, MD
Raj Ganeshan, MD
Alicia Burr, APRN, MSN
Mark Blitzer, MD
Joseph Akar, MD
Rachel Lampert, MD, FHRS
spellingShingle Virginia Workman, MD
James V. Freeman, MD
Edinrin R. Obasare, MBBS
Shashank Jain, MD
Raj Ganeshan, MD
Alicia Burr, APRN, MSN
Mark Blitzer, MD
Joseph Akar, MD
Rachel Lampert, MD, FHRS
Risk of COVID-19 infection after cardiac electrophysiology procedures
Heart Rhythm O2
Ablation
Coronavirus
Electrophysiology
Implantation
Nosocomial transmission
author_facet Virginia Workman, MD
James V. Freeman, MD
Edinrin R. Obasare, MBBS
Shashank Jain, MD
Raj Ganeshan, MD
Alicia Burr, APRN, MSN
Mark Blitzer, MD
Joseph Akar, MD
Rachel Lampert, MD, FHRS
author_sort Virginia Workman, MD
title Risk of COVID-19 infection after cardiac electrophysiology procedures
title_short Risk of COVID-19 infection after cardiac electrophysiology procedures
title_full Risk of COVID-19 infection after cardiac electrophysiology procedures
title_fullStr Risk of COVID-19 infection after cardiac electrophysiology procedures
title_full_unstemmed Risk of COVID-19 infection after cardiac electrophysiology procedures
title_sort risk of covid-19 infection after cardiac electrophysiology procedures
publisher Elsevier
series Heart Rhythm O2
issn 2666-5018
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, attempts to conserve resources and limit virus spread have resulted in delay of nonemergent procedures across all medical specialties, including cardiac electrophysiology (EP). Many patients have delayed care and continue to express concerns about potential nosocomial spread of coronavirus. Objective: To quantify risk of development of COVID-19 owing to in-hospital transmission related to an EP procedure, in the setting of preventive measures instituted in our laboratory areas. Methods: We contacted patients by telephone who underwent emergent procedures in the electrophysiology lab during the COVID-19 surge at our hospital (March 16, 2020, to May 15, 2020, reaching daily census 450 COVID-19 patients,) ≥2 weeks after the procedure, to assess for symptoms of and/or testing for COVID-19, and assessed outcomes from medical record review. Results: Of the 124 patients undergoing EP procedures in this period, none had developed documented or suspected coronavirus infection. Seven patients described symptoms of chest pain, dyspnea, or fever; 3 were tested for coronavirus and found to be negative. Of the remaining 4, 2 had a more plausible alternative explanation for the symptoms, and 2 had transient symptoms not meeting published criteria for probable COVID-19 infection. Conclusion: Despite a high hospital census of COVID-19 patients during the period of hospital stay for an EP procedure, there were no likely COVID-19 infections occurring in follow-up of at least 2 weeks. With proper use of preventive measures as recommended by published guidelines, the risk of nosocomial spread of COVID-19 to patients in the EP lab is low.
topic Ablation
Coronavirus
Electrophysiology
Implantation
Nosocomial transmission
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266650182030115X
work_keys_str_mv AT virginiaworkmanmd riskofcovid19infectionaftercardiacelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT jamesvfreemanmd riskofcovid19infectionaftercardiacelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT edinrinrobasarembbs riskofcovid19infectionaftercardiacelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT shashankjainmd riskofcovid19infectionaftercardiacelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT rajganeshanmd riskofcovid19infectionaftercardiacelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT aliciaburraprnmsn riskofcovid19infectionaftercardiacelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT markblitzermd riskofcovid19infectionaftercardiacelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT josephakarmd riskofcovid19infectionaftercardiacelectrophysiologyprocedures
AT rachellampertmdfhrs riskofcovid19infectionaftercardiacelectrophysiologyprocedures
_version_ 1717817864330674176