Factors that Influence the Reported Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Testing for SARS-CoV-2

Tests that detect the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen in clinical specimens from the upper respiratory tract can provide a rapid means of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis and help identify individuals who may be infectious and should isol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valentin Parvu, Devin S. Gary, Joseph Mann, Yu-Chih Lin, Dorsey Mills, Lauren Cooper, Jeffrey C. Andrews, Yukari C. Manabe, Andrew Pekosz, Charles K. Cooper
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.714242/full
id doaj-993df17e03ab442680bb755fff60c149
record_format Article
spelling doaj-993df17e03ab442680bb755fff60c1492021-10-05T06:28:41ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2021-10-011210.3389/fmicb.2021.714242714242Factors that Influence the Reported Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Testing for SARS-CoV-2Valentin Parvu0Devin S. Gary1Joseph Mann2Yu-Chih Lin3Dorsey Mills4Lauren Cooper5Jeffrey C. Andrews6Yukari C. Manabe7Yukari C. Manabe8Andrew Pekosz9Andrew Pekosz10Charles K. Cooper11Becton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences–Integrated Diagnostic Solutions, Sparks, MD, United StatesBecton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences–Integrated Diagnostic Solutions, Sparks, MD, United StatesBecton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences–Integrated Diagnostic Solutions, Sparks, MD, United StatesBecton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences–Integrated Diagnostic Solutions, Sparks, MD, United StatesBecton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences–Integrated Diagnostic Solutions, Sparks, MD, United StatesBecton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences–Integrated Diagnostic Solutions, Sparks, MD, United StatesBecton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences–Integrated Diagnostic Solutions, Sparks, MD, United StatesW. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United StatesDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United StatesW. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United StatesDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United StatesBecton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences–Integrated Diagnostic Solutions, Sparks, MD, United StatesTests that detect the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen in clinical specimens from the upper respiratory tract can provide a rapid means of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis and help identify individuals who may be infectious and should isolate to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission. This systematic review assesses the diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection in COVID-19 symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals compared to quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and summarizes antigen test sensitivity using meta-regression. In total, 83 studies were included that compared SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen-based lateral flow testing (RALFT) to RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2. Generally, the quality of the evaluated studies was inconsistent; nevertheless, the overall sensitivity for RALFT was determined to be 75.0% (95% confidence interval: 71.0–78.0). Additionally, RALFT sensitivity was found to be higher for symptomatic vs. asymptomatic individuals and was higher for a symptomatic population within 7 days from symptom onset compared to a population with extended days of symptoms. Viral load was found to be the most important factor for determining SARS-CoV-2 antigen test sensitivity. Other design factors, such as specimen storage and anatomical collection type, also affect the performance of RALFT. RALFT and RT-qPCR testing both achieve high sensitivity when compared to SARS-CoV-2 viral culture.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.714242/fulltest sensitivitySARS-CoV-2diagnostic accuracyrapid antigen testingRT-PCRmeta-regression analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Valentin Parvu
Devin S. Gary
Joseph Mann
Yu-Chih Lin
Dorsey Mills
Lauren Cooper
Jeffrey C. Andrews
Yukari C. Manabe
Yukari C. Manabe
Andrew Pekosz
Andrew Pekosz
Charles K. Cooper
spellingShingle Valentin Parvu
Devin S. Gary
Joseph Mann
Yu-Chih Lin
Dorsey Mills
Lauren Cooper
Jeffrey C. Andrews
Yukari C. Manabe
Yukari C. Manabe
Andrew Pekosz
Andrew Pekosz
Charles K. Cooper
Factors that Influence the Reported Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Testing for SARS-CoV-2
Frontiers in Microbiology
test sensitivity
SARS-CoV-2
diagnostic accuracy
rapid antigen testing
RT-PCR
meta-regression analysis
author_facet Valentin Parvu
Devin S. Gary
Joseph Mann
Yu-Chih Lin
Dorsey Mills
Lauren Cooper
Jeffrey C. Andrews
Yukari C. Manabe
Yukari C. Manabe
Andrew Pekosz
Andrew Pekosz
Charles K. Cooper
author_sort Valentin Parvu
title Factors that Influence the Reported Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Testing for SARS-CoV-2
title_short Factors that Influence the Reported Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Testing for SARS-CoV-2
title_full Factors that Influence the Reported Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Testing for SARS-CoV-2
title_fullStr Factors that Influence the Reported Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Testing for SARS-CoV-2
title_full_unstemmed Factors that Influence the Reported Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Testing for SARS-CoV-2
title_sort factors that influence the reported sensitivity of rapid antigen testing for sars-cov-2
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Microbiology
issn 1664-302X
publishDate 2021-10-01
description Tests that detect the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen in clinical specimens from the upper respiratory tract can provide a rapid means of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis and help identify individuals who may be infectious and should isolate to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission. This systematic review assesses the diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection in COVID-19 symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals compared to quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and summarizes antigen test sensitivity using meta-regression. In total, 83 studies were included that compared SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen-based lateral flow testing (RALFT) to RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2. Generally, the quality of the evaluated studies was inconsistent; nevertheless, the overall sensitivity for RALFT was determined to be 75.0% (95% confidence interval: 71.0–78.0). Additionally, RALFT sensitivity was found to be higher for symptomatic vs. asymptomatic individuals and was higher for a symptomatic population within 7 days from symptom onset compared to a population with extended days of symptoms. Viral load was found to be the most important factor for determining SARS-CoV-2 antigen test sensitivity. Other design factors, such as specimen storage and anatomical collection type, also affect the performance of RALFT. RALFT and RT-qPCR testing both achieve high sensitivity when compared to SARS-CoV-2 viral culture.
topic test sensitivity
SARS-CoV-2
diagnostic accuracy
rapid antigen testing
RT-PCR
meta-regression analysis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.714242/full
work_keys_str_mv AT valentinparvu factorsthatinfluencethereportedsensitivityofrapidantigentestingforsarscov2
AT devinsgary factorsthatinfluencethereportedsensitivityofrapidantigentestingforsarscov2
AT josephmann factorsthatinfluencethereportedsensitivityofrapidantigentestingforsarscov2
AT yuchihlin factorsthatinfluencethereportedsensitivityofrapidantigentestingforsarscov2
AT dorseymills factorsthatinfluencethereportedsensitivityofrapidantigentestingforsarscov2
AT laurencooper factorsthatinfluencethereportedsensitivityofrapidantigentestingforsarscov2
AT jeffreycandrews factorsthatinfluencethereportedsensitivityofrapidantigentestingforsarscov2
AT yukaricmanabe factorsthatinfluencethereportedsensitivityofrapidantigentestingforsarscov2
AT yukaricmanabe factorsthatinfluencethereportedsensitivityofrapidantigentestingforsarscov2
AT andrewpekosz factorsthatinfluencethereportedsensitivityofrapidantigentestingforsarscov2
AT andrewpekosz factorsthatinfluencethereportedsensitivityofrapidantigentestingforsarscov2
AT charleskcooper factorsthatinfluencethereportedsensitivityofrapidantigentestingforsarscov2
_version_ 1716843455440748544