De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer

Abstract In the modern era, highly effective anti-HER2 therapy is associated with low local-regional recurrence (LRR) rates for early-stage HER2+ breast cancer raising the question of whether local therapy de-escalation by radiation omission is possible in patients with small-node negative tumors tr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jose G. Bazan, Sachin R. Jhawar, Daniel Stover, Ko Un Park, Sasha Beyer, Erin Healy, Julia R. White
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-03-01
Series:npj Breast Cancer
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00242-8
id doaj-9924a15756c443988ef0afef40bd20e6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9924a15756c443988ef0afef40bd20e62021-03-28T11:03:50ZengNature Publishing Groupnpj Breast Cancer2374-46772021-03-017111010.1038/s41523-021-00242-8De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancerJose G. Bazan0Sachin R. Jhawar1Daniel Stover2Ko Un Park3Sasha Beyer4Erin Healy5Julia R. White6Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center—Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast CenterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center—Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast CenterDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center—Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast CenterDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center—Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast CenterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center—Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast CenterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center—Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast CenterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center—Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast CenterAbstract In the modern era, highly effective anti-HER2 therapy is associated with low local-regional recurrence (LRR) rates for early-stage HER2+ breast cancer raising the question of whether local therapy de-escalation by radiation omission is possible in patients with small-node negative tumors treated with lumpectomy. To evaluate existing data on radiation omission, we used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to test the hypothesis that RT omission results in equivalent overall survival (OS) in stage 1 (T1N0) HER2+ breast cancer. We excluded patients that received neoadjuvant systemic therapy. We stratified the cohort by receipt of adjuvant radiation. We identified 6897 patients (6388 RT; 509 no RT). Patients that did not receive radiation tended to be ≥70 years-old (odds ratio [OR] = 3.69, 95% CI: 3.02–4.51, p < 0.0001), to have ≥1 comorbidity (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.06–1.68, p = 0.0154), to be Hispanic (OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.00–2.22, p = 0.049), and to live in lower income areas (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07–1.64, p = 0.0266). Radiation omission was associated with a 3.67-fold (95% CI: 2.23–6.02, p < 0.0001) increased risk of death. While other selection biases that influence radiation omission likely persist, these data should give caution to radiation omission in T1N0 HER2+ breast cancer.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00242-8
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jose G. Bazan
Sachin R. Jhawar
Daniel Stover
Ko Un Park
Sasha Beyer
Erin Healy
Julia R. White
spellingShingle Jose G. Bazan
Sachin R. Jhawar
Daniel Stover
Ko Un Park
Sasha Beyer
Erin Healy
Julia R. White
De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer
npj Breast Cancer
author_facet Jose G. Bazan
Sachin R. Jhawar
Daniel Stover
Ko Un Park
Sasha Beyer
Erin Healy
Julia R. White
author_sort Jose G. Bazan
title De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer
title_short De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer
title_full De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer
title_fullStr De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer
title_sort de-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage i, node-negative, her2-positive breast cancer
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series npj Breast Cancer
issn 2374-4677
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract In the modern era, highly effective anti-HER2 therapy is associated with low local-regional recurrence (LRR) rates for early-stage HER2+ breast cancer raising the question of whether local therapy de-escalation by radiation omission is possible in patients with small-node negative tumors treated with lumpectomy. To evaluate existing data on radiation omission, we used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to test the hypothesis that RT omission results in equivalent overall survival (OS) in stage 1 (T1N0) HER2+ breast cancer. We excluded patients that received neoadjuvant systemic therapy. We stratified the cohort by receipt of adjuvant radiation. We identified 6897 patients (6388 RT; 509 no RT). Patients that did not receive radiation tended to be ≥70 years-old (odds ratio [OR] = 3.69, 95% CI: 3.02–4.51, p < 0.0001), to have ≥1 comorbidity (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.06–1.68, p = 0.0154), to be Hispanic (OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.00–2.22, p = 0.049), and to live in lower income areas (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07–1.64, p = 0.0266). Radiation omission was associated with a 3.67-fold (95% CI: 2.23–6.02, p < 0.0001) increased risk of death. While other selection biases that influence radiation omission likely persist, these data should give caution to radiation omission in T1N0 HER2+ breast cancer.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00242-8
work_keys_str_mv AT josegbazan deescalationofradiationtherapyinpatientswithstageinodenegativeher2positivebreastcancer
AT sachinrjhawar deescalationofradiationtherapyinpatientswithstageinodenegativeher2positivebreastcancer
AT danielstover deescalationofradiationtherapyinpatientswithstageinodenegativeher2positivebreastcancer
AT kounpark deescalationofradiationtherapyinpatientswithstageinodenegativeher2positivebreastcancer
AT sashabeyer deescalationofradiationtherapyinpatientswithstageinodenegativeher2positivebreastcancer
AT erinhealy deescalationofradiationtherapyinpatientswithstageinodenegativeher2positivebreastcancer
AT juliarwhite deescalationofradiationtherapyinpatientswithstageinodenegativeher2positivebreastcancer
_version_ 1724200509366075392