De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer
Abstract In the modern era, highly effective anti-HER2 therapy is associated with low local-regional recurrence (LRR) rates for early-stage HER2+ breast cancer raising the question of whether local therapy de-escalation by radiation omission is possible in patients with small-node negative tumors tr...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2021-03-01
|
Series: | npj Breast Cancer |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00242-8 |
id |
doaj-9924a15756c443988ef0afef40bd20e6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9924a15756c443988ef0afef40bd20e62021-03-28T11:03:50ZengNature Publishing Groupnpj Breast Cancer2374-46772021-03-017111010.1038/s41523-021-00242-8De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancerJose G. Bazan0Sachin R. Jhawar1Daniel Stover2Ko Un Park3Sasha Beyer4Erin Healy5Julia R. White6Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center—Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast CenterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center—Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast CenterDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center—Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast CenterDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center—Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast CenterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center—Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast CenterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center—Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast CenterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center—Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast CenterAbstract In the modern era, highly effective anti-HER2 therapy is associated with low local-regional recurrence (LRR) rates for early-stage HER2+ breast cancer raising the question of whether local therapy de-escalation by radiation omission is possible in patients with small-node negative tumors treated with lumpectomy. To evaluate existing data on radiation omission, we used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to test the hypothesis that RT omission results in equivalent overall survival (OS) in stage 1 (T1N0) HER2+ breast cancer. We excluded patients that received neoadjuvant systemic therapy. We stratified the cohort by receipt of adjuvant radiation. We identified 6897 patients (6388 RT; 509 no RT). Patients that did not receive radiation tended to be ≥70 years-old (odds ratio [OR] = 3.69, 95% CI: 3.02–4.51, p < 0.0001), to have ≥1 comorbidity (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.06–1.68, p = 0.0154), to be Hispanic (OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.00–2.22, p = 0.049), and to live in lower income areas (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07–1.64, p = 0.0266). Radiation omission was associated with a 3.67-fold (95% CI: 2.23–6.02, p < 0.0001) increased risk of death. While other selection biases that influence radiation omission likely persist, these data should give caution to radiation omission in T1N0 HER2+ breast cancer.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00242-8 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jose G. Bazan Sachin R. Jhawar Daniel Stover Ko Un Park Sasha Beyer Erin Healy Julia R. White |
spellingShingle |
Jose G. Bazan Sachin R. Jhawar Daniel Stover Ko Un Park Sasha Beyer Erin Healy Julia R. White De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer npj Breast Cancer |
author_facet |
Jose G. Bazan Sachin R. Jhawar Daniel Stover Ko Un Park Sasha Beyer Erin Healy Julia R. White |
author_sort |
Jose G. Bazan |
title |
De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer |
title_short |
De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer |
title_full |
De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer |
title_fullStr |
De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer |
title_sort |
de-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage i, node-negative, her2-positive breast cancer |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
series |
npj Breast Cancer |
issn |
2374-4677 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Abstract In the modern era, highly effective anti-HER2 therapy is associated with low local-regional recurrence (LRR) rates for early-stage HER2+ breast cancer raising the question of whether local therapy de-escalation by radiation omission is possible in patients with small-node negative tumors treated with lumpectomy. To evaluate existing data on radiation omission, we used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to test the hypothesis that RT omission results in equivalent overall survival (OS) in stage 1 (T1N0) HER2+ breast cancer. We excluded patients that received neoadjuvant systemic therapy. We stratified the cohort by receipt of adjuvant radiation. We identified 6897 patients (6388 RT; 509 no RT). Patients that did not receive radiation tended to be ≥70 years-old (odds ratio [OR] = 3.69, 95% CI: 3.02–4.51, p < 0.0001), to have ≥1 comorbidity (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.06–1.68, p = 0.0154), to be Hispanic (OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.00–2.22, p = 0.049), and to live in lower income areas (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07–1.64, p = 0.0266). Radiation omission was associated with a 3.67-fold (95% CI: 2.23–6.02, p < 0.0001) increased risk of death. While other selection biases that influence radiation omission likely persist, these data should give caution to radiation omission in T1N0 HER2+ breast cancer. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00242-8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT josegbazan deescalationofradiationtherapyinpatientswithstageinodenegativeher2positivebreastcancer AT sachinrjhawar deescalationofradiationtherapyinpatientswithstageinodenegativeher2positivebreastcancer AT danielstover deescalationofradiationtherapyinpatientswithstageinodenegativeher2positivebreastcancer AT kounpark deescalationofradiationtherapyinpatientswithstageinodenegativeher2positivebreastcancer AT sashabeyer deescalationofradiationtherapyinpatientswithstageinodenegativeher2positivebreastcancer AT erinhealy deescalationofradiationtherapyinpatientswithstageinodenegativeher2positivebreastcancer AT juliarwhite deescalationofradiationtherapyinpatientswithstageinodenegativeher2positivebreastcancer |
_version_ |
1724200509366075392 |