Comparative evaluation of photovoltaic MPP trackers: A simulated approach

This paper makes a comparative assessment of three popular maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithms used in photovoltaic power generation. A 120 Wp PV module is taken as reference for the study that is connected to a suitable resistive load by a boost converter. Two profiles of variation of so...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barnam Jyoti Saharia, Munish Manas, Bani Kanta Talukdar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016-12-01
Series:Cogent Engineering
Subjects:
pv
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2015.1137206
id doaj-99207a1995ca462e9a5096cdf99b7f78
record_format Article
spelling doaj-99207a1995ca462e9a5096cdf99b7f782021-01-15T14:43:41ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Engineering2331-19162016-12-013110.1080/23311916.2015.11372061137206Comparative evaluation of photovoltaic MPP trackers: A simulated approachBarnam Jyoti Saharia0Munish Manas1Bani Kanta Talukdar2Tezpur UniversityTezpur UniversityAssam Engineering CollegeThis paper makes a comparative assessment of three popular maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithms used in photovoltaic power generation. A 120 Wp PV module is taken as reference for the study that is connected to a suitable resistive load by a boost converter. Two profiles of variation of solar insolation at fixed temperature and varying temperature at fixed solar insolation are taken to test the tracking efficiency of three MPPT algorithms based on the perturb and observe (P&O), Fuzzy logic, and Neural Network techniques. MATLAB/SIMULINK simulation software is used for assessment, and the results indicate that the fuzzy logic-based tracker presents better tracking effectiveness to variations in both solar insolation and temperature profiles when compared to P&O technique and Neural Network-based technique.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2015.1137206pvboost converterperturb and observefuzzy logicneural networkstracking factor
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Barnam Jyoti Saharia
Munish Manas
Bani Kanta Talukdar
spellingShingle Barnam Jyoti Saharia
Munish Manas
Bani Kanta Talukdar
Comparative evaluation of photovoltaic MPP trackers: A simulated approach
Cogent Engineering
pv
boost converter
perturb and observe
fuzzy logic
neural networks
tracking factor
author_facet Barnam Jyoti Saharia
Munish Manas
Bani Kanta Talukdar
author_sort Barnam Jyoti Saharia
title Comparative evaluation of photovoltaic MPP trackers: A simulated approach
title_short Comparative evaluation of photovoltaic MPP trackers: A simulated approach
title_full Comparative evaluation of photovoltaic MPP trackers: A simulated approach
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of photovoltaic MPP trackers: A simulated approach
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of photovoltaic MPP trackers: A simulated approach
title_sort comparative evaluation of photovoltaic mpp trackers: a simulated approach
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Cogent Engineering
issn 2331-1916
publishDate 2016-12-01
description This paper makes a comparative assessment of three popular maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithms used in photovoltaic power generation. A 120 Wp PV module is taken as reference for the study that is connected to a suitable resistive load by a boost converter. Two profiles of variation of solar insolation at fixed temperature and varying temperature at fixed solar insolation are taken to test the tracking efficiency of three MPPT algorithms based on the perturb and observe (P&O), Fuzzy logic, and Neural Network techniques. MATLAB/SIMULINK simulation software is used for assessment, and the results indicate that the fuzzy logic-based tracker presents better tracking effectiveness to variations in both solar insolation and temperature profiles when compared to P&O technique and Neural Network-based technique.
topic pv
boost converter
perturb and observe
fuzzy logic
neural networks
tracking factor
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2015.1137206
work_keys_str_mv AT barnamjyotisaharia comparativeevaluationofphotovoltaicmpptrackersasimulatedapproach
AT munishmanas comparativeevaluationofphotovoltaicmpptrackersasimulatedapproach
AT banikantatalukdar comparativeevaluationofphotovoltaicmpptrackersasimulatedapproach
_version_ 1724336857037144064