Social media representation of female genital cutting: A YouTube analysis

Introduction: Female genital cutting is a practice that has incited controversy and conflicting discourses across the international community. There is a need to analyze social media data on the portrayal of the practice in order to gather insights and inform strategic planning and interventions des...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arone Wondwossen Fantaye, Anne TM Konkle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-09-01
Series:Women's Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1745506520949732
id doaj-9919d060009b4843984eb961f0733b65
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9919d060009b4843984eb961f0733b652020-11-25T02:02:16ZengSAGE PublishingWomen's Health1745-50652020-09-011610.1177/1745506520949732Social media representation of female genital cutting: A YouTube analysisArone Wondwossen Fantaye0Anne TM Konkle1Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaUniversity of Ottawa Brain and Mind Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaIntroduction: Female genital cutting is a practice that has incited controversy and conflicting discourses across the international community. There is a need to analyze social media data on the portrayal of the practice in order to gather insights and inform strategic planning and interventions design. This study aims to explore and describe the portrayal of female genital cutting in the comments section of YouTube comment posts. Methods: This mixed-method study employs a content analysis approach with a sequential exploratory design. A total of 150 YouTube comment posts were analyzed through qualitative content analysis and quantitative descriptive content analysis on NVivo 11 and Microsoft Excel, respectively. Results: Salient subthemes from the qualitative component included likening female genital cutting with male genital cutting, differentiating female genital cutting from male genital cutting, branding female genital cutting as a harmful and unethical practice, branding female genital cutting as a normal tradition, contribution of religion and culture to female genital cutting, gender inequality issues, and the need for education or cultural relativism to change or cope with the practice. The quantitative component identified neutral, positive, mixed, and neutral tones; and formal, colloquial, and mixed language types; as well as targets of stigma with patterns in the themes. Conclusion: The portrayal of female genital cutting in the YouTube comment posts revealed the range of perceptions, beliefs, and opinions of users with various stances on the practice. Study findings are useful for strategic planning and the development of interventions with informative goals. Study findings can also help to gage and evaluate the effectiveness of existing programs that aim to reduce misinformation about female genital cutting or aim to reduce stigmas surrounding the practice.https://doi.org/10.1177/1745506520949732
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Arone Wondwossen Fantaye
Anne TM Konkle
spellingShingle Arone Wondwossen Fantaye
Anne TM Konkle
Social media representation of female genital cutting: A YouTube analysis
Women's Health
author_facet Arone Wondwossen Fantaye
Anne TM Konkle
author_sort Arone Wondwossen Fantaye
title Social media representation of female genital cutting: A YouTube analysis
title_short Social media representation of female genital cutting: A YouTube analysis
title_full Social media representation of female genital cutting: A YouTube analysis
title_fullStr Social media representation of female genital cutting: A YouTube analysis
title_full_unstemmed Social media representation of female genital cutting: A YouTube analysis
title_sort social media representation of female genital cutting: a youtube analysis
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Women's Health
issn 1745-5065
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Introduction: Female genital cutting is a practice that has incited controversy and conflicting discourses across the international community. There is a need to analyze social media data on the portrayal of the practice in order to gather insights and inform strategic planning and interventions design. This study aims to explore and describe the portrayal of female genital cutting in the comments section of YouTube comment posts. Methods: This mixed-method study employs a content analysis approach with a sequential exploratory design. A total of 150 YouTube comment posts were analyzed through qualitative content analysis and quantitative descriptive content analysis on NVivo 11 and Microsoft Excel, respectively. Results: Salient subthemes from the qualitative component included likening female genital cutting with male genital cutting, differentiating female genital cutting from male genital cutting, branding female genital cutting as a harmful and unethical practice, branding female genital cutting as a normal tradition, contribution of religion and culture to female genital cutting, gender inequality issues, and the need for education or cultural relativism to change or cope with the practice. The quantitative component identified neutral, positive, mixed, and neutral tones; and formal, colloquial, and mixed language types; as well as targets of stigma with patterns in the themes. Conclusion: The portrayal of female genital cutting in the YouTube comment posts revealed the range of perceptions, beliefs, and opinions of users with various stances on the practice. Study findings are useful for strategic planning and the development of interventions with informative goals. Study findings can also help to gage and evaluate the effectiveness of existing programs that aim to reduce misinformation about female genital cutting or aim to reduce stigmas surrounding the practice.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1745506520949732
work_keys_str_mv AT aronewondwossenfantaye socialmediarepresentationoffemalegenitalcuttingayoutubeanalysis
AT annetmkonkle socialmediarepresentationoffemalegenitalcuttingayoutubeanalysis
_version_ 1724954090839998464