The Cognitive and Economic Value of a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea

We studied the value of a nuclear power plant by considering Koreans' willingness to pay (WTP) for neutralizing the various problems caused by building and operating a new plant. For this, we used a conjoint analysis and ordered logistic regression. We then compared the WTP estimates between va...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gil-Hwan Lim, Woo-Jin Jung, Tae-Hwan Kim, Sang-Yong Tom Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-04-01
Series:Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573316302376
id doaj-9906e376329f44daaa633e1b5cec39a6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9906e376329f44daaa633e1b5cec39a62020-11-24T22:42:40ZengElsevierNuclear Engineering and Technology1738-57332017-04-0149360962010.1016/j.net.2016.10.007The Cognitive and Economic Value of a Nuclear Power Plant in KoreaGil-Hwan Lim0Woo-Jin Jung1Tae-Hwan Kim2Sang-Yong Tom Lee3National Assembly Budget Office (NABO), 1 Uisadang-daero Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 07233, South KoreaInformation Technology Research Center, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul 120-749, South KoreaSchool of Business, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-Ro, Seongdong-Gu, Seoul 04763, South KoreaSchool of Business, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-Ro, Seongdong-Gu, Seoul 04763, South KoreaWe studied the value of a nuclear power plant by considering Koreans' willingness to pay (WTP) for neutralizing the various problems caused by building and operating a new plant. For this, we used a conjoint analysis and ordered logistic regression. We then compared the WTP estimates between various segment groups. The results revealed that each household was willing to pay an additional 99,677 Korean Won (KRW)/mo on average to resolve the negative impacts from a nuclear plant. Therefore, the yearly cognitive and economic value of a nuclear plant in Korea was about 19 trillion KRW. Through a segment analysis, we found that the more educated, younger, and poorer groups gave higher cognitive values than the less educated, older, and richer groups, respectively. Also, people who lived far from a plant gave higher values than people living near a plant, and people with more knowledge about or interest in nuclear energy gave higher values than people with less knowledge or interest. People who felt that nuclear energy is necessary gave higher values to nuclear energy than those who did not. Our results can be used as bases to set targets for promoting nuclear energy and pursuing a national project of building a nuclear power plant.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573316302376Conjoint AnalysisNuclear Power PlantOrdered Logistic RegressionSegment AnalysisWillingness to Pay (WTP)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gil-Hwan Lim
Woo-Jin Jung
Tae-Hwan Kim
Sang-Yong Tom Lee
spellingShingle Gil-Hwan Lim
Woo-Jin Jung
Tae-Hwan Kim
Sang-Yong Tom Lee
The Cognitive and Economic Value of a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Conjoint Analysis
Nuclear Power Plant
Ordered Logistic Regression
Segment Analysis
Willingness to Pay (WTP)
author_facet Gil-Hwan Lim
Woo-Jin Jung
Tae-Hwan Kim
Sang-Yong Tom Lee
author_sort Gil-Hwan Lim
title The Cognitive and Economic Value of a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea
title_short The Cognitive and Economic Value of a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea
title_full The Cognitive and Economic Value of a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea
title_fullStr The Cognitive and Economic Value of a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea
title_full_unstemmed The Cognitive and Economic Value of a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea
title_sort cognitive and economic value of a nuclear power plant in korea
publisher Elsevier
series Nuclear Engineering and Technology
issn 1738-5733
publishDate 2017-04-01
description We studied the value of a nuclear power plant by considering Koreans' willingness to pay (WTP) for neutralizing the various problems caused by building and operating a new plant. For this, we used a conjoint analysis and ordered logistic regression. We then compared the WTP estimates between various segment groups. The results revealed that each household was willing to pay an additional 99,677 Korean Won (KRW)/mo on average to resolve the negative impacts from a nuclear plant. Therefore, the yearly cognitive and economic value of a nuclear plant in Korea was about 19 trillion KRW. Through a segment analysis, we found that the more educated, younger, and poorer groups gave higher cognitive values than the less educated, older, and richer groups, respectively. Also, people who lived far from a plant gave higher values than people living near a plant, and people with more knowledge about or interest in nuclear energy gave higher values than people with less knowledge or interest. People who felt that nuclear energy is necessary gave higher values to nuclear energy than those who did not. Our results can be used as bases to set targets for promoting nuclear energy and pursuing a national project of building a nuclear power plant.
topic Conjoint Analysis
Nuclear Power Plant
Ordered Logistic Regression
Segment Analysis
Willingness to Pay (WTP)
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573316302376
work_keys_str_mv AT gilhwanlim thecognitiveandeconomicvalueofanuclearpowerplantinkorea
AT woojinjung thecognitiveandeconomicvalueofanuclearpowerplantinkorea
AT taehwankim thecognitiveandeconomicvalueofanuclearpowerplantinkorea
AT sangyongtomlee thecognitiveandeconomicvalueofanuclearpowerplantinkorea
AT gilhwanlim cognitiveandeconomicvalueofanuclearpowerplantinkorea
AT woojinjung cognitiveandeconomicvalueofanuclearpowerplantinkorea
AT taehwankim cognitiveandeconomicvalueofanuclearpowerplantinkorea
AT sangyongtomlee cognitiveandeconomicvalueofanuclearpowerplantinkorea
_version_ 1725699084066488320