The Cognitive and Economic Value of a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea
We studied the value of a nuclear power plant by considering Koreans' willingness to pay (WTP) for neutralizing the various problems caused by building and operating a new plant. For this, we used a conjoint analysis and ordered logistic regression. We then compared the WTP estimates between va...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2017-04-01
|
Series: | Nuclear Engineering and Technology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573316302376 |
id |
doaj-9906e376329f44daaa633e1b5cec39a6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9906e376329f44daaa633e1b5cec39a62020-11-24T22:42:40ZengElsevierNuclear Engineering and Technology1738-57332017-04-0149360962010.1016/j.net.2016.10.007The Cognitive and Economic Value of a Nuclear Power Plant in KoreaGil-Hwan Lim0Woo-Jin Jung1Tae-Hwan Kim2Sang-Yong Tom Lee3National Assembly Budget Office (NABO), 1 Uisadang-daero Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 07233, South KoreaInformation Technology Research Center, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul 120-749, South KoreaSchool of Business, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-Ro, Seongdong-Gu, Seoul 04763, South KoreaSchool of Business, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-Ro, Seongdong-Gu, Seoul 04763, South KoreaWe studied the value of a nuclear power plant by considering Koreans' willingness to pay (WTP) for neutralizing the various problems caused by building and operating a new plant. For this, we used a conjoint analysis and ordered logistic regression. We then compared the WTP estimates between various segment groups. The results revealed that each household was willing to pay an additional 99,677 Korean Won (KRW)/mo on average to resolve the negative impacts from a nuclear plant. Therefore, the yearly cognitive and economic value of a nuclear plant in Korea was about 19 trillion KRW. Through a segment analysis, we found that the more educated, younger, and poorer groups gave higher cognitive values than the less educated, older, and richer groups, respectively. Also, people who lived far from a plant gave higher values than people living near a plant, and people with more knowledge about or interest in nuclear energy gave higher values than people with less knowledge or interest. People who felt that nuclear energy is necessary gave higher values to nuclear energy than those who did not. Our results can be used as bases to set targets for promoting nuclear energy and pursuing a national project of building a nuclear power plant.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573316302376Conjoint AnalysisNuclear Power PlantOrdered Logistic RegressionSegment AnalysisWillingness to Pay (WTP) |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gil-Hwan Lim Woo-Jin Jung Tae-Hwan Kim Sang-Yong Tom Lee |
spellingShingle |
Gil-Hwan Lim Woo-Jin Jung Tae-Hwan Kim Sang-Yong Tom Lee The Cognitive and Economic Value of a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea Nuclear Engineering and Technology Conjoint Analysis Nuclear Power Plant Ordered Logistic Regression Segment Analysis Willingness to Pay (WTP) |
author_facet |
Gil-Hwan Lim Woo-Jin Jung Tae-Hwan Kim Sang-Yong Tom Lee |
author_sort |
Gil-Hwan Lim |
title |
The Cognitive and Economic Value of a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea |
title_short |
The Cognitive and Economic Value of a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea |
title_full |
The Cognitive and Economic Value of a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea |
title_fullStr |
The Cognitive and Economic Value of a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Cognitive and Economic Value of a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea |
title_sort |
cognitive and economic value of a nuclear power plant in korea |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Nuclear Engineering and Technology |
issn |
1738-5733 |
publishDate |
2017-04-01 |
description |
We studied the value of a nuclear power plant by considering Koreans' willingness to pay (WTP) for neutralizing the various problems caused by building and operating a new plant. For this, we used a conjoint analysis and ordered logistic regression. We then compared the WTP estimates between various segment groups. The results revealed that each household was willing to pay an additional 99,677 Korean Won (KRW)/mo on average to resolve the negative impacts from a nuclear plant. Therefore, the yearly cognitive and economic value of a nuclear plant in Korea was about 19 trillion KRW. Through a segment analysis, we found that the more educated, younger, and poorer groups gave higher cognitive values than the less educated, older, and richer groups, respectively. Also, people who lived far from a plant gave higher values than people living near a plant, and people with more knowledge about or interest in nuclear energy gave higher values than people with less knowledge or interest. People who felt that nuclear energy is necessary gave higher values to nuclear energy than those who did not. Our results can be used as bases to set targets for promoting nuclear energy and pursuing a national project of building a nuclear power plant. |
topic |
Conjoint Analysis Nuclear Power Plant Ordered Logistic Regression Segment Analysis Willingness to Pay (WTP) |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573316302376 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gilhwanlim thecognitiveandeconomicvalueofanuclearpowerplantinkorea AT woojinjung thecognitiveandeconomicvalueofanuclearpowerplantinkorea AT taehwankim thecognitiveandeconomicvalueofanuclearpowerplantinkorea AT sangyongtomlee thecognitiveandeconomicvalueofanuclearpowerplantinkorea AT gilhwanlim cognitiveandeconomicvalueofanuclearpowerplantinkorea AT woojinjung cognitiveandeconomicvalueofanuclearpowerplantinkorea AT taehwankim cognitiveandeconomicvalueofanuclearpowerplantinkorea AT sangyongtomlee cognitiveandeconomicvalueofanuclearpowerplantinkorea |
_version_ |
1725699084066488320 |