Comparison of classical and transgenic genetic sexing strains of Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) for application of the sterile insect technique.

• Main Authors: José S Meza, Ihsan Ul Haq, Marc J B Vreysen, Kostas Bourtzis, Georgios A Kyritsis, Carlos Cáceres
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
• Series: PLoS ONE
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208880

The development of genetic sexing strains (GSSs) based on classical genetic approaches has revolutionized the application of the sterile insect technique (SIT) against the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). The global use of Mediterranean fruit fly GSS for SIT applications as part of area-wide integrated pest management (AW-IPM) programmes is testimony to their effectiveness. During recent years, transgenic sexing strains (TSSs) have been developed through genetic engineering techniques offering the possibility to produce male-only progeny by introducing female embryonic lethal genes and to increase the efficacy to identify released sterile males by means of the expression of fluorescent transgene markers. Here, we present a comparative analysis of two Mediterranean fruit fly strains: the classical GSS VIENNA 8D53-/Toliman and the transgenic FSEL#32. The strains were compared for production efficiency and quality control indices under semi mass-rearing conditions, response to sterilizing irradiation doses, male mating performance in walk-in field cages, and production cost of male-only pupae. The results showed that, the FSEL #32 TSS had a similar fecundity but a higher production of male-only pupae than the VIENNA 8D53-/Toliman GSS. For some of the quality control parameters tested, such as pupal weight and survival under starvation conditions, the FSEL #32 TSS was inferior to the VIENNA 8D53-/Toliman GSS. Both the transgenic and the classical genetic sexing strains have shown acceptable and similar mating competitiveness when compared with wild males for mating with wild females. The cost production for both strains is similar but the FSEL#32 TSS may potentially be more cost effective at higher production levels. The results are discussed in the context of incorporating the transgenic strain for SIT application.