Aspects of the application of issue Estoppel on directors’ fiduciary duties in South Africa: possible lessons from the United Kingdom and related jurisdictions Royal Sechaba case
The doctrine of estoppel precludes a person (asserter) from asserting something different or contrary to what is implied by a previous action, conduct or statement of that person or by a previous pertinent judicial determination. While there are various types of estoppel, this article is primarily f...
Main Author: | Howard Chitimira |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Bucharest University of Economic Studies
2017-10-01
|
Series: | Juridical Tribune |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An7v11/10.%20Chitimira.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Unmasking some challenges associated with the enforcement of issue estoppel in South African commercial-related disputes with reference to Prinsloo NO v Goldex 15 (243/11) [2012] ZASCA 28 (28 March 2012)
by: Howard Chitimira, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01) -
Application of the estoppel rule in procedural relations
by: Victor V. Terekhov
Published: (2019-11-01) -
PRINSIP FIDUCIARY DUTIES DALAM DUNIA KEAGENAN (AGENCY)
by: Budi Santoso
Published: (2014-04-01) -
Good faith in corporate law – an independent fiduciary duty or an element of the duty of loyalty?
by: Adina Ponta
Published: (2016-12-01) -
Corporate Managers and the Wide Discretion for their Fiduciary Duties: Problematic or not?
by: Bily, Karen
Published: (2009)