Documentary Film Rhetoric: Saving Face and the Public Sphere

This paper will discuss the 2012 Academy Award-winning short documentary Saving Face and the social action campaign surrounding the film. In the absence of true investigative journalism, documentary film has become a new discourse community that circumvents institutions and uses the Convergence Cult...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vincent Piturro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The International Academic Forum 2017-04-01
Series:IAFOR Journal of Media, Communication & Film
Subjects:
Online Access:https://iafor.org/journal/iafor-journal-of-media-communication-and-film/volume-2-issue-1/article-3/
id doaj-98c6afeb0bcb45a691c2ed22b60180b2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-98c6afeb0bcb45a691c2ed22b60180b22020-11-24T21:47:54ZengThe International Academic ForumIAFOR Journal of Media, Communication & Film2187-06672187-06672017-04-0121253710.22492/ijmcf.2.1.03Documentary Film Rhetoric: Saving Face and the Public SphereVincent Piturro0Metropolitan State University of Denver, United States of AmericaThis paper will discuss the 2012 Academy Award-winning short documentary Saving Face and the social action campaign surrounding the film. In the absence of true investigative journalism, documentary film has become a new discourse community that circumvents institutions and uses the Convergence Culture as a mechanism for education and social action. Documentaries such as Saving Face highlight Gerard Hauser’s definition of rhetoric – “the use of symbols to induce social action” – and Hauser’s re-formation of the public sphere as described by Jürgen Habermas. Hauser views the public sphere as one formulated by ideas – or discourse – rather than the identity of the population engaging in the discussion. In other words, the film, and many other documentaries, form new public spheres that break down social, economic, class, and geographic boundaries. These films encourage global discourse and lead to global action. As Christina Tangora Schlacter notes, the critical component of the public sphere “is the concept of a deliberative democracy: one in which there is critical analysis of democratic decisions and where social issues are based on the collective interest of the public…” (36). Where investigative journalism and democratic processes have failed, documentary film has filled in the gaps. Documentary film has the power to both inform and induce social action in a globalized society, using the very tools of globalization to formulate public spheres among disconnected publics. This paper will examine the current trend of documentary film as both investigative journalism and social action through a specific example.https://iafor.org/journal/iafor-journal-of-media-communication-and-film/volume-2-issue-1/article-3/social actionactivismdocumentaryacid attacksPakistani womenpublic sphereHabermas
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vincent Piturro
spellingShingle Vincent Piturro
Documentary Film Rhetoric: Saving Face and the Public Sphere
IAFOR Journal of Media, Communication & Film
social action
activism
documentary
acid attacks
Pakistani women
public sphere
Habermas
author_facet Vincent Piturro
author_sort Vincent Piturro
title Documentary Film Rhetoric: Saving Face and the Public Sphere
title_short Documentary Film Rhetoric: Saving Face and the Public Sphere
title_full Documentary Film Rhetoric: Saving Face and the Public Sphere
title_fullStr Documentary Film Rhetoric: Saving Face and the Public Sphere
title_full_unstemmed Documentary Film Rhetoric: Saving Face and the Public Sphere
title_sort documentary film rhetoric: saving face and the public sphere
publisher The International Academic Forum
series IAFOR Journal of Media, Communication & Film
issn 2187-0667
2187-0667
publishDate 2017-04-01
description This paper will discuss the 2012 Academy Award-winning short documentary Saving Face and the social action campaign surrounding the film. In the absence of true investigative journalism, documentary film has become a new discourse community that circumvents institutions and uses the Convergence Culture as a mechanism for education and social action. Documentaries such as Saving Face highlight Gerard Hauser’s definition of rhetoric – “the use of symbols to induce social action” – and Hauser’s re-formation of the public sphere as described by Jürgen Habermas. Hauser views the public sphere as one formulated by ideas – or discourse – rather than the identity of the population engaging in the discussion. In other words, the film, and many other documentaries, form new public spheres that break down social, economic, class, and geographic boundaries. These films encourage global discourse and lead to global action. As Christina Tangora Schlacter notes, the critical component of the public sphere “is the concept of a deliberative democracy: one in which there is critical analysis of democratic decisions and where social issues are based on the collective interest of the public…” (36). Where investigative journalism and democratic processes have failed, documentary film has filled in the gaps. Documentary film has the power to both inform and induce social action in a globalized society, using the very tools of globalization to formulate public spheres among disconnected publics. This paper will examine the current trend of documentary film as both investigative journalism and social action through a specific example.
topic social action
activism
documentary
acid attacks
Pakistani women
public sphere
Habermas
url https://iafor.org/journal/iafor-journal-of-media-communication-and-film/volume-2-issue-1/article-3/
work_keys_str_mv AT vincentpiturro documentaryfilmrhetoricsavingfaceandthepublicsphere
_version_ 1725894802388549632