Comparing strengths, difficulties, and loneliness between socioeconomically deprived and advantaged children

Aims and Objectives: The present study is an attempt to study strengths-difficulties, and experiences of loneliness in below poverty line (BPL) and above poverty line (APL) children and compared the same between two groups. Materials and Methods: The total sample consisted of 120 participants (age r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M Vijay Kumar, Raghuram Macharapu, Pramod Kumar Reddy Mallepalli, Ravulapati Sateesh Babu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Archives of Mental Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.amhonline.org/article.asp?issn=2589-9171;year=2018;volume=19;issue=2;spage=123;epage=128;aulast=Kumar
id doaj-98c15d59f0814d8995aa098548bc9d43
record_format Article
spelling doaj-98c15d59f0814d8995aa098548bc9d432020-11-25T04:08:08ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsArchives of Mental Health2589-91712589-918X2018-01-0119212312810.4103/AMH.AMH_28_18Comparing strengths, difficulties, and loneliness between socioeconomically deprived and advantaged childrenM Vijay KumarRaghuram MacharapuPramod Kumar Reddy MallepalliRavulapati Sateesh BabuAims and Objectives: The present study is an attempt to study strengths-difficulties, and experiences of loneliness in below poverty line (BPL) and above poverty line (APL) children and compared the same between two groups. Materials and Methods: The total sample consisted of 120 participants (age range 10–13 years), 60 BPL and 60 APL children. Each group further consisted of 25 females and 35 males. The samples were drawn using convenience sampling method. Strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) and loneliness and social dissatisfaction scale were the tools used. Results: In BPL children, peer problems were found to be the highest (i.e. 25% in abnormal and 55% in borderline range). Significant difference was found between BPL and APL children on emotional symptoms (P = 0.003), peer problems (P = 0.02), and prosocial behavior (P = 0.03), on SDQ, and experiences of loneliness (P = 0.04) on loneliness and social dissatisfaction questionnaire. The significant negative correlation was found between loneliness score and emotional symptoms score (P = 0.03), loneliness score and hyperactivity score (P = 0.002), and between loneliness score and peer problems score (P = 0.001). The significant positive correlation was found between experiences of loneliness score and prosocial behavior score (P = 0.03). Conclusions: In BPL children, peer problems were found to be the highest. BPL children have more emotional symptoms, peer problems, and feeling more lonely compared to APL children. APL children have low prosocial behavior. Children with more emotional symptoms, peer problems, and hyperactivity are feeling lonely. Children with low prosocial behavior are feeling lonely.http://www.amhonline.org/article.asp?issn=2589-9171;year=2018;volume=19;issue=2;spage=123;epage=128;aulast=Kumarbelow poverty line childrenlonelinessstrengths-difficulties
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M Vijay Kumar
Raghuram Macharapu
Pramod Kumar Reddy Mallepalli
Ravulapati Sateesh Babu
spellingShingle M Vijay Kumar
Raghuram Macharapu
Pramod Kumar Reddy Mallepalli
Ravulapati Sateesh Babu
Comparing strengths, difficulties, and loneliness between socioeconomically deprived and advantaged children
Archives of Mental Health
below poverty line children
loneliness
strengths-difficulties
author_facet M Vijay Kumar
Raghuram Macharapu
Pramod Kumar Reddy Mallepalli
Ravulapati Sateesh Babu
author_sort M Vijay Kumar
title Comparing strengths, difficulties, and loneliness between socioeconomically deprived and advantaged children
title_short Comparing strengths, difficulties, and loneliness between socioeconomically deprived and advantaged children
title_full Comparing strengths, difficulties, and loneliness between socioeconomically deprived and advantaged children
title_fullStr Comparing strengths, difficulties, and loneliness between socioeconomically deprived and advantaged children
title_full_unstemmed Comparing strengths, difficulties, and loneliness between socioeconomically deprived and advantaged children
title_sort comparing strengths, difficulties, and loneliness between socioeconomically deprived and advantaged children
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Archives of Mental Health
issn 2589-9171
2589-918X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Aims and Objectives: The present study is an attempt to study strengths-difficulties, and experiences of loneliness in below poverty line (BPL) and above poverty line (APL) children and compared the same between two groups. Materials and Methods: The total sample consisted of 120 participants (age range 10–13 years), 60 BPL and 60 APL children. Each group further consisted of 25 females and 35 males. The samples were drawn using convenience sampling method. Strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) and loneliness and social dissatisfaction scale were the tools used. Results: In BPL children, peer problems were found to be the highest (i.e. 25% in abnormal and 55% in borderline range). Significant difference was found between BPL and APL children on emotional symptoms (P = 0.003), peer problems (P = 0.02), and prosocial behavior (P = 0.03), on SDQ, and experiences of loneliness (P = 0.04) on loneliness and social dissatisfaction questionnaire. The significant negative correlation was found between loneliness score and emotional symptoms score (P = 0.03), loneliness score and hyperactivity score (P = 0.002), and between loneliness score and peer problems score (P = 0.001). The significant positive correlation was found between experiences of loneliness score and prosocial behavior score (P = 0.03). Conclusions: In BPL children, peer problems were found to be the highest. BPL children have more emotional symptoms, peer problems, and feeling more lonely compared to APL children. APL children have low prosocial behavior. Children with more emotional symptoms, peer problems, and hyperactivity are feeling lonely. Children with low prosocial behavior are feeling lonely.
topic below poverty line children
loneliness
strengths-difficulties
url http://www.amhonline.org/article.asp?issn=2589-9171;year=2018;volume=19;issue=2;spage=123;epage=128;aulast=Kumar
work_keys_str_mv AT mvijaykumar comparingstrengthsdifficultiesandlonelinessbetweensocioeconomicallydeprivedandadvantagedchildren
AT raghurammacharapu comparingstrengthsdifficultiesandlonelinessbetweensocioeconomicallydeprivedandadvantagedchildren
AT pramodkumarreddymallepalli comparingstrengthsdifficultiesandlonelinessbetweensocioeconomicallydeprivedandadvantagedchildren
AT ravulapatisateeshbabu comparingstrengthsdifficultiesandlonelinessbetweensocioeconomicallydeprivedandadvantagedchildren
_version_ 1724426688190742528