Theoretical research without projects.

We propose a funding scheme for theoretical research that does not rely on project proposals, but on recent past scientific productivity. Given a quantitative figure of merit on the latter and the total research budget, we introduce a number of policies to decide the allocation of funds in each gran...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miguel Navascués, Costantino Budroni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214026
id doaj-98a4a996dace4b378cddd16d733e2837
record_format Article
spelling doaj-98a4a996dace4b378cddd16d733e28372021-03-03T20:46:47ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01143e021402610.1371/journal.pone.0214026Theoretical research without projects.Miguel NavascuésCostantino BudroniWe propose a funding scheme for theoretical research that does not rely on project proposals, but on recent past scientific productivity. Given a quantitative figure of merit on the latter and the total research budget, we introduce a number of policies to decide the allocation of funds in each grant call. Under some assumptions on scientific productivity, some of such policies are shown to converge, in the limit of many grant calls, to a funding configuration that is close to the maximum total productivity of the whole scientific community. We present numerical simulations showing evidence that these schemes would also perform well in the presence of statistical noise in the scientific productivity and/or its evaluation. Finally, we prove that one of our policies cannot be cheated by individual research units. Our work must be understood as a first step towards a mathematical theory of the research activity.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214026
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Miguel Navascués
Costantino Budroni
spellingShingle Miguel Navascués
Costantino Budroni
Theoretical research without projects.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Miguel Navascués
Costantino Budroni
author_sort Miguel Navascués
title Theoretical research without projects.
title_short Theoretical research without projects.
title_full Theoretical research without projects.
title_fullStr Theoretical research without projects.
title_full_unstemmed Theoretical research without projects.
title_sort theoretical research without projects.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description We propose a funding scheme for theoretical research that does not rely on project proposals, but on recent past scientific productivity. Given a quantitative figure of merit on the latter and the total research budget, we introduce a number of policies to decide the allocation of funds in each grant call. Under some assumptions on scientific productivity, some of such policies are shown to converge, in the limit of many grant calls, to a funding configuration that is close to the maximum total productivity of the whole scientific community. We present numerical simulations showing evidence that these schemes would also perform well in the presence of statistical noise in the scientific productivity and/or its evaluation. Finally, we prove that one of our policies cannot be cheated by individual research units. Our work must be understood as a first step towards a mathematical theory of the research activity.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214026
work_keys_str_mv AT miguelnavascues theoreticalresearchwithoutprojects
AT costantinobudroni theoreticalresearchwithoutprojects
_version_ 1714820662144532480