Simulations of flow separation control numerically using different plasma actuator models
This study investigates the active flow control on NACA0012 airfoil numerically by introducing dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma actuators. The flow over the airfoil simulations were performed using ANSYS program for free-stream velocity 14.6 m/s at wide range of angle of attacks (from 0 to...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Alexandria Engineering Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016820303021 |
id |
doaj-9865f39245314e08a135dd4b4ed0f1d1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9865f39245314e08a135dd4b4ed0f1d12021-06-02T09:04:45ZengElsevierAlexandria Engineering Journal1110-01682020-10-0159538813896Simulations of flow separation control numerically using different plasma actuator modelsHatem Abdelraouf0Ahmed M. Nagib Elmekawy1Sadek Z. Kassab2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria, EgyptCorresponding author.; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria, EgyptDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria, EgyptThis study investigates the active flow control on NACA0012 airfoil numerically by introducing dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma actuators. The flow over the airfoil simulations were performed using ANSYS program for free-stream velocity 14.6 m/s at wide range of angle of attacks (from 0 to 20 degrees) on NACA0012 airfoil with applied voltage 16 kV across the electrodes. There are several plasma actuator models, which simulate the effect of the plasma actuator. This paper focuses on two numerical methods: Shyy model and Suzen model. They depend on calculating the induced body force of the plasma and import it in Navier Stokes equation as an external body force. Mesh independence study is performed on the airfoil and validate the results without plasma activation with the experimental results. Two actuators were added at positions 0.1 and 0.3 of the chord length to the airfoil and an investigation is performed on the lift CL and drag Cd coefficients of the airfoil without and with the presence of the plasma. A comparison between the numerical results of the two different plasma simulation models is performed to check the accuracy of each model and the two simulation models give nearly the same results. Shyy model is recommended to simulate this type of flow due to its simplicity, faster convergence and accuracy.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016820303021Active flow controlShyy modelSuzen modelDielectric barrier discharge (DBD)Flow separationPlasma actuator |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hatem Abdelraouf Ahmed M. Nagib Elmekawy Sadek Z. Kassab |
spellingShingle |
Hatem Abdelraouf Ahmed M. Nagib Elmekawy Sadek Z. Kassab Simulations of flow separation control numerically using different plasma actuator models Alexandria Engineering Journal Active flow control Shyy model Suzen model Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) Flow separation Plasma actuator |
author_facet |
Hatem Abdelraouf Ahmed M. Nagib Elmekawy Sadek Z. Kassab |
author_sort |
Hatem Abdelraouf |
title |
Simulations of flow separation control numerically using different plasma actuator models |
title_short |
Simulations of flow separation control numerically using different plasma actuator models |
title_full |
Simulations of flow separation control numerically using different plasma actuator models |
title_fullStr |
Simulations of flow separation control numerically using different plasma actuator models |
title_full_unstemmed |
Simulations of flow separation control numerically using different plasma actuator models |
title_sort |
simulations of flow separation control numerically using different plasma actuator models |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Alexandria Engineering Journal |
issn |
1110-0168 |
publishDate |
2020-10-01 |
description |
This study investigates the active flow control on NACA0012 airfoil numerically by introducing dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma actuators. The flow over the airfoil simulations were performed using ANSYS program for free-stream velocity 14.6 m/s at wide range of angle of attacks (from 0 to 20 degrees) on NACA0012 airfoil with applied voltage 16 kV across the electrodes. There are several plasma actuator models, which simulate the effect of the plasma actuator. This paper focuses on two numerical methods: Shyy model and Suzen model. They depend on calculating the induced body force of the plasma and import it in Navier Stokes equation as an external body force. Mesh independence study is performed on the airfoil and validate the results without plasma activation with the experimental results. Two actuators were added at positions 0.1 and 0.3 of the chord length to the airfoil and an investigation is performed on the lift CL and drag Cd coefficients of the airfoil without and with the presence of the plasma. A comparison between the numerical results of the two different plasma simulation models is performed to check the accuracy of each model and the two simulation models give nearly the same results. Shyy model is recommended to simulate this type of flow due to its simplicity, faster convergence and accuracy. |
topic |
Active flow control Shyy model Suzen model Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) Flow separation Plasma actuator |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016820303021 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hatemabdelraouf simulationsofflowseparationcontrolnumericallyusingdifferentplasmaactuatormodels AT ahmedmnagibelmekawy simulationsofflowseparationcontrolnumericallyusingdifferentplasmaactuatormodels AT sadekzkassab simulationsofflowseparationcontrolnumericallyusingdifferentplasmaactuatormodels |
_version_ |
1721406155626905600 |