Web-Based Smartphone Algorithm for Calculating Blood Pressure From Photoplethysmography Remotely in a General Adult Population: Validation Study
BackgroundOutside of a clinical setting, oscillometric devices make remote monitoring of blood pressure and virtual care more convenient and feasible. HeartBeat Technologies Ltd developed a novel approach to measuring blood pressure remotely after an initial blood pressure re...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JMIR Publications
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
Online Access: | https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e19187 |
id |
doaj-986045aea9ab4147970c5de59bc49bd0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-986045aea9ab4147970c5de59bc49bd02021-04-23T14:30:53ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712021-04-01234e1918710.2196/19187Web-Based Smartphone Algorithm for Calculating Blood Pressure From Photoplethysmography Remotely in a General Adult Population: Validation StudyHolyoke, PaulYogaratnam, KarthikaKalles, Elizabeth BackgroundOutside of a clinical setting, oscillometric devices make remote monitoring of blood pressure and virtual care more convenient and feasible. HeartBeat Technologies Ltd developed a novel approach to measuring blood pressure remotely after an initial blood pressure reading by a nurse using the conventional measurement method. Using a finger pulse oximeter, a photoplethysmogram wave is transmitted by Bluetooth to a smartphone or tablet. A smartphone app (MediBeat) transmits the photoplethysmogram to a server for analysis by a proprietary algorithm—the person’s current blood pressure is sent back to the smartphone and to the individual’s health care provider. ObjectiveThis study sought to determine whether the HeartBeat algorithm calculates blood pressure as accurately as required by the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 (ESH-IP2) for validation of blood pressure measuring devices. MethodsESH-IP2 requirements, modified to conform to a more recent international consensus statement, were followed. The ESH-IP2 establishes strict guidelines for the conduct and reporting of any validation of any device to measure blood pressure, including using the standard manual blood pressure instrument as a comparator and specific required accuracy levels for low, medium, and high ranges of blood pressure readings. The consensus statement requires a greater number of study participants for each of the blood pressure ranges. The validation of the accuracy of the algorithm was conducted with a Contec CMS50EW pulse oximeter and a Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 smartphone. ResultsThe differences between the HeartBeat-calculated and the manually measured blood pressures of 62 study participants did not meet the ESH-IP2 standards for accuracy for either systolic or diastolic blood pressure measurements. There was no discernible pattern in the inaccuracies of the HeartBeat-calculated measurements. ConclusionsThe October 4, 2019 version of the HeartBeat algorithm, implemented in combination with the MediBeat app, a pulse oximeter, and an Android smartphone, was not sufficiently accurate for use in a general adult population. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04082819; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04082819https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e19187 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Holyoke, Paul Yogaratnam, Karthika Kalles, Elizabeth |
spellingShingle |
Holyoke, Paul Yogaratnam, Karthika Kalles, Elizabeth Web-Based Smartphone Algorithm for Calculating Blood Pressure From Photoplethysmography Remotely in a General Adult Population: Validation Study Journal of Medical Internet Research |
author_facet |
Holyoke, Paul Yogaratnam, Karthika Kalles, Elizabeth |
author_sort |
Holyoke, Paul |
title |
Web-Based Smartphone Algorithm for Calculating Blood Pressure From Photoplethysmography Remotely in a General Adult Population: Validation Study |
title_short |
Web-Based Smartphone Algorithm for Calculating Blood Pressure From Photoplethysmography Remotely in a General Adult Population: Validation Study |
title_full |
Web-Based Smartphone Algorithm for Calculating Blood Pressure From Photoplethysmography Remotely in a General Adult Population: Validation Study |
title_fullStr |
Web-Based Smartphone Algorithm for Calculating Blood Pressure From Photoplethysmography Remotely in a General Adult Population: Validation Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Web-Based Smartphone Algorithm for Calculating Blood Pressure From Photoplethysmography Remotely in a General Adult Population: Validation Study |
title_sort |
web-based smartphone algorithm for calculating blood pressure from photoplethysmography remotely in a general adult population: validation study |
publisher |
JMIR Publications |
series |
Journal of Medical Internet Research |
issn |
1438-8871 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
BackgroundOutside of a clinical setting, oscillometric devices make remote monitoring of blood pressure and virtual care more convenient and feasible. HeartBeat Technologies Ltd developed a novel approach to measuring blood pressure remotely after an initial blood pressure reading by a nurse using the conventional measurement method. Using a finger pulse oximeter, a photoplethysmogram wave is transmitted by Bluetooth to a smartphone or tablet. A smartphone app (MediBeat) transmits the photoplethysmogram to a server for analysis by a proprietary algorithm—the person’s current blood pressure is sent back to the smartphone and to the individual’s health care provider.
ObjectiveThis study sought to determine whether the HeartBeat algorithm calculates blood pressure as accurately as required by the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 (ESH-IP2) for validation of blood pressure measuring devices.
MethodsESH-IP2 requirements, modified to conform to a more recent international consensus statement, were followed. The ESH-IP2 establishes strict guidelines for the conduct and reporting of any validation of any device to measure blood pressure, including using the standard manual blood pressure instrument as a comparator and specific required accuracy levels for low, medium, and high ranges of blood pressure readings. The consensus statement requires a greater number of study participants for each of the blood pressure ranges. The validation of the accuracy of the algorithm was conducted with a Contec CMS50EW pulse oximeter and a Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 smartphone.
ResultsThe differences between the HeartBeat-calculated and the manually measured blood pressures of 62 study participants did not meet the ESH-IP2 standards for accuracy for either systolic or diastolic blood pressure measurements. There was no discernible pattern in the inaccuracies of the HeartBeat-calculated measurements.
ConclusionsThe October 4, 2019 version of the HeartBeat algorithm, implemented in combination with the MediBeat app, a pulse oximeter, and an Android smartphone, was not sufficiently accurate for use in a general adult population.
Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04082819; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04082819 |
url |
https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e19187 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT holyokepaul webbasedsmartphonealgorithmforcalculatingbloodpressurefromphotoplethysmographyremotelyinageneraladultpopulationvalidationstudy AT yogaratnamkarthika webbasedsmartphonealgorithmforcalculatingbloodpressurefromphotoplethysmographyremotelyinageneraladultpopulationvalidationstudy AT kalleselizabeth webbasedsmartphonealgorithmforcalculatingbloodpressurefromphotoplethysmographyremotelyinageneraladultpopulationvalidationstudy |
_version_ |
1721512681367666688 |