Multistage Investment Actions with the Emission Cap
To achieve the emission reduction target in 2020, China plans to establish a nationwide carbon trading market during 2016–2019. It is therefore an important but difficult task for policymakers to set emission allowances and allocate them among entities. There are three alternative allocation rules,...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Mathematical Problems in Engineering |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9168765 |
id |
doaj-984ead2122144efba58051187209cdf2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-984ead2122144efba58051187209cdf22020-11-24T23:26:23ZengHindawi LimitedMathematical Problems in Engineering1024-123X1563-51472016-01-01201610.1155/2016/91687659168765Multistage Investment Actions with the Emission CapMingrong Wang0Mingxi Wang1Yi Hu2Haibin Xie3School of Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, ChinaSchool of International Trade and Economics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, ChinaSchool of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, ChinaSchool of Banking and Finance, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, ChinaTo achieve the emission reduction target in 2020, China plans to establish a nationwide carbon trading market during 2016–2019. It is therefore an important but difficult task for policymakers to set emission allowances and allocate them among entities. There are three alternative allocation rules, which vary from free of charge to full auctioning. For business managers, the question is whether one of these rules meets the emission cap at the minimum cost. Based on China’s emission-abatement target, this paper examines the optimal investment and analyzes its implementation in different allocation rules. A new model is developed to formulate enterprises’ emission reduction pathways and the cost-minimization problem with the emission cap. The results show that the magnitude of enterprises’ emission reduction is positively related to their innovation potential; neither auctioning nor being free of charge can make enterprise’s individual emission-abatement investment in accordance with the optimal level; enterprise’s individual emission-abatement investment is sensitive to efficiency, budget cap, and environmental benefit. This paper discusses simultaneously their policy implications for China.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9168765 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mingrong Wang Mingxi Wang Yi Hu Haibin Xie |
spellingShingle |
Mingrong Wang Mingxi Wang Yi Hu Haibin Xie Multistage Investment Actions with the Emission Cap Mathematical Problems in Engineering |
author_facet |
Mingrong Wang Mingxi Wang Yi Hu Haibin Xie |
author_sort |
Mingrong Wang |
title |
Multistage Investment Actions with the Emission Cap |
title_short |
Multistage Investment Actions with the Emission Cap |
title_full |
Multistage Investment Actions with the Emission Cap |
title_fullStr |
Multistage Investment Actions with the Emission Cap |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multistage Investment Actions with the Emission Cap |
title_sort |
multistage investment actions with the emission cap |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Mathematical Problems in Engineering |
issn |
1024-123X 1563-5147 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
To achieve the emission reduction target in 2020, China plans to establish a nationwide carbon trading market during 2016–2019. It is therefore an important but difficult task for policymakers to set emission allowances and allocate them among entities. There are three alternative allocation rules, which vary from free of charge to full auctioning. For business managers, the question is whether one of these rules meets the emission cap at the minimum cost. Based on China’s emission-abatement target, this paper examines the optimal investment and analyzes its implementation in different allocation rules. A new model is developed to formulate enterprises’ emission reduction pathways and the cost-minimization problem with the emission cap. The results show that the magnitude of enterprises’ emission reduction is positively related to their innovation potential; neither auctioning nor being free of charge can make enterprise’s individual emission-abatement investment in accordance with the optimal level; enterprise’s individual emission-abatement investment is sensitive to efficiency, budget cap, and environmental benefit. This paper discusses simultaneously their policy implications for China. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9168765 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mingrongwang multistageinvestmentactionswiththeemissioncap AT mingxiwang multistageinvestmentactionswiththeemissioncap AT yihu multistageinvestmentactionswiththeemissioncap AT haibinxie multistageinvestmentactionswiththeemissioncap |
_version_ |
1725555435944017920 |