Multistage Investment Actions with the Emission Cap

To achieve the emission reduction target in 2020, China plans to establish a nationwide carbon trading market during 2016–2019. It is therefore an important but difficult task for policymakers to set emission allowances and allocate them among entities. There are three alternative allocation rules,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mingrong Wang, Mingxi Wang, Yi Hu, Haibin Xie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2016-01-01
Series:Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9168765
id doaj-984ead2122144efba58051187209cdf2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-984ead2122144efba58051187209cdf22020-11-24T23:26:23ZengHindawi LimitedMathematical Problems in Engineering1024-123X1563-51472016-01-01201610.1155/2016/91687659168765Multistage Investment Actions with the Emission CapMingrong Wang0Mingxi Wang1Yi Hu2Haibin Xie3School of Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, ChinaSchool of International Trade and Economics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, ChinaSchool of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, ChinaSchool of Banking and Finance, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, ChinaTo achieve the emission reduction target in 2020, China plans to establish a nationwide carbon trading market during 2016–2019. It is therefore an important but difficult task for policymakers to set emission allowances and allocate them among entities. There are three alternative allocation rules, which vary from free of charge to full auctioning. For business managers, the question is whether one of these rules meets the emission cap at the minimum cost. Based on China’s emission-abatement target, this paper examines the optimal investment and analyzes its implementation in different allocation rules. A new model is developed to formulate enterprises’ emission reduction pathways and the cost-minimization problem with the emission cap. The results show that the magnitude of enterprises’ emission reduction is positively related to their innovation potential; neither auctioning nor being free of charge can make enterprise’s individual emission-abatement investment in accordance with the optimal level; enterprise’s individual emission-abatement investment is sensitive to efficiency, budget cap, and environmental benefit. This paper discusses simultaneously their policy implications for China.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9168765
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mingrong Wang
Mingxi Wang
Yi Hu
Haibin Xie
spellingShingle Mingrong Wang
Mingxi Wang
Yi Hu
Haibin Xie
Multistage Investment Actions with the Emission Cap
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
author_facet Mingrong Wang
Mingxi Wang
Yi Hu
Haibin Xie
author_sort Mingrong Wang
title Multistage Investment Actions with the Emission Cap
title_short Multistage Investment Actions with the Emission Cap
title_full Multistage Investment Actions with the Emission Cap
title_fullStr Multistage Investment Actions with the Emission Cap
title_full_unstemmed Multistage Investment Actions with the Emission Cap
title_sort multistage investment actions with the emission cap
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Mathematical Problems in Engineering
issn 1024-123X
1563-5147
publishDate 2016-01-01
description To achieve the emission reduction target in 2020, China plans to establish a nationwide carbon trading market during 2016–2019. It is therefore an important but difficult task for policymakers to set emission allowances and allocate them among entities. There are three alternative allocation rules, which vary from free of charge to full auctioning. For business managers, the question is whether one of these rules meets the emission cap at the minimum cost. Based on China’s emission-abatement target, this paper examines the optimal investment and analyzes its implementation in different allocation rules. A new model is developed to formulate enterprises’ emission reduction pathways and the cost-minimization problem with the emission cap. The results show that the magnitude of enterprises’ emission reduction is positively related to their innovation potential; neither auctioning nor being free of charge can make enterprise’s individual emission-abatement investment in accordance with the optimal level; enterprise’s individual emission-abatement investment is sensitive to efficiency, budget cap, and environmental benefit. This paper discusses simultaneously their policy implications for China.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9168765
work_keys_str_mv AT mingrongwang multistageinvestmentactionswiththeemissioncap
AT mingxiwang multistageinvestmentactionswiththeemissioncap
AT yihu multistageinvestmentactionswiththeemissioncap
AT haibinxie multistageinvestmentactionswiththeemissioncap
_version_ 1725555435944017920