Comparison of harvester work in forest and simulator environments

Harvester simulators offer a safe and cost-saving method for studying the basics of harvester controls and working technique. Therefore, harvester simulators are increasingly being used in the education of harvester operators. In this study, the objective was to compare harvester work...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ovaskainen, Heikki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Finnish Society of Forest Science 2005-01-01
Series:Silva Fennica
Online Access:https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/398
id doaj-9840411aee674960a83866ef8d9d0a30
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9840411aee674960a83866ef8d9d0a302020-11-25T03:31:05ZengFinnish Society of Forest ScienceSilva Fennica2242-40752005-01-0139110.14214/sf.398Comparison of harvester work in forest and simulator environmentsOvaskainen, Heikki Harvester simulators offer a safe and cost-saving method for studying the basics of harvester controls and working technique. Therefore, harvester simulators are increasingly being used in the education of harvester operators. In this study, the objective was to compare harvester work in real and simulator environments, and to determine how a professional harvester operatorâs working technique may have changed in the simulator environment. Specific features of the simulator that encumbered operatorsâ normal work are also presented; and the correspondence of the simulator to reality is evaluated. The work of six professional harvester operators was studied in thinning and in clear cutting stands in both environments: first in the real forest and thereafter on the simulator. The results indicate that the operatorsâ working technique on the simulator was mainly the same as in the real forest. This means that the same restrictions are valid on the simulator as in the forest. The basic principles of harvesting must be known so that high productivity and good quality can be obtained. However, certain simulator-specific features encumbered the work of harvester operators. Limited visibility to the side increased the need to reverse and the 3D-visualization caused failed catches. Improvements in software would remove some of the defects, e.g. failed felling and cheating in the felling phase. These results also indicate that simulators can be used for research purposes.https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/398
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ovaskainen, Heikki
spellingShingle Ovaskainen, Heikki
Comparison of harvester work in forest and simulator environments
Silva Fennica
author_facet Ovaskainen, Heikki
author_sort Ovaskainen, Heikki
title Comparison of harvester work in forest and simulator environments
title_short Comparison of harvester work in forest and simulator environments
title_full Comparison of harvester work in forest and simulator environments
title_fullStr Comparison of harvester work in forest and simulator environments
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of harvester work in forest and simulator environments
title_sort comparison of harvester work in forest and simulator environments
publisher Finnish Society of Forest Science
series Silva Fennica
issn 2242-4075
publishDate 2005-01-01
description Harvester simulators offer a safe and cost-saving method for studying the basics of harvester controls and working technique. Therefore, harvester simulators are increasingly being used in the education of harvester operators. In this study, the objective was to compare harvester work in real and simulator environments, and to determine how a professional harvester operatorâs working technique may have changed in the simulator environment. Specific features of the simulator that encumbered operatorsâ normal work are also presented; and the correspondence of the simulator to reality is evaluated. The work of six professional harvester operators was studied in thinning and in clear cutting stands in both environments: first in the real forest and thereafter on the simulator. The results indicate that the operatorsâ working technique on the simulator was mainly the same as in the real forest. This means that the same restrictions are valid on the simulator as in the forest. The basic principles of harvesting must be known so that high productivity and good quality can be obtained. However, certain simulator-specific features encumbered the work of harvester operators. Limited visibility to the side increased the need to reverse and the 3D-visualization caused failed catches. Improvements in software would remove some of the defects, e.g. failed felling and cheating in the felling phase. These results also indicate that simulators can be used for research purposes.
url https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/398
work_keys_str_mv AT ovaskainenheikki comparisonofharvesterworkinforestandsimulatorenvironments
_version_ 1724573776095477760